The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 7:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-immigration5-2010mar05,0,1123497.story

Quote:
Obama looking to give new life to immigration reform
By Peter Nicholas

March 4, 2010 | 6:18 p.m.


Reporting from Washington - Despite steep odds, the White House has discussed prospects for reviving a major overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, a commitment that President Obama has postponed once already.

Obama took up the issue privately with his staff Monday in a bid to advance a bill through Congress before lawmakers become too distracted by approaching midterm elections.

In the session, Obama and members of his Domestic Policy Council outlined ways to resuscitate the effort in a White House meeting with two senators -- Democrat Charles E. Schumer of New York and Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina -- who have spent months trying to craft a bill.

According to a person familiar with the meeting, the White House may ask Schumer and Graham to at least produce a blueprint that could be turned into legislative language.

The basis of a bill would include a path toward citizenship for the 10.8 million people living in the U.S. illegally. Citizenship would not be granted lightly, the White House said. Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation.

Nick Shapiro, a White House spokesman, said the president's support for an immigration bill, which would also include improved border security, was "unwavering."

Participants in the White House gathering also pointed to an immigration rally set for March 21 in Washington as a way to spotlight the issue and build needed momentum.

Though proponents of an immigration overhaul were pleased that the White House wasn't abandoning the effort, they also wanted Obama to take on a more assertive role, rather than leave it to Congress to work out a compromise.

Immigration is a delicate issue for the White House. After promising to revamp in his first year of office what many see as a fractured system, Obama risks angering a growing, politically potent Latino constituency if he defers the goal until 2011.

But with the healthcare debate still unresolved, Democrats are wary of plunging into another polarizing issue.

"Right now we have a little problem with the 'Chicken Little' mentality: The sky is falling and consequently we can't do anything," Rep. Raul M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) said in an interview.

Republicans are unlikely to cooperate. On Capitol Hill, Republicans said that partisan tensions had only gotten worse since Obama signaled this week that he would push forward with a healthcare bill, whether he could get GOP votes or not.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said in an interview, "The things you hear from the administration won't be well received."

Schumer, speaking as he walked quickly through the Capitol, said he was having trouble rounding up Republican supporters apart from Graham. "It's tough finding someone, but we're trying," Schumer said.

On Thursday, Schumer met with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who oversees the government's immigration efforts, to strategize over potential Republican co-sponsors.

"We're very hopeful we can get a bill done. We have all the pieces in place. We just need a second Republican," Schumer said in a statement.

Among proponents, there is a consensus that a proposal must move by April or early May to have a realistic chance of passing this year. If that deadline slips, Congress' focus is likely to shift to the November elections, making it impossible to take up major legislation.

"There's no question that this is a heavy lift and the window is narrowing," said Janet Murguia, president and chief executive of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino advocacy group.

When it comes to immigration, Obama's strategy echoes that of healthcare. He has deferred heavily to Congress, leaving it up to Schumer and Graham to reach a breakthrough with the idea that he would put his weight behind the resulting compromise.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:24 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
If you don't secure the border first, legalizing those already here solves no real problems.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Rorinthas wrote:
If you don't secure the border first, legalizing those already here solves no real problems.


In fact, its likely to make things worse, as legitimizing those already here can create a flow of new illegals to cross and claim that they were already here.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Müs wrote:
In fact, its likely to make things worse, as legitimizing those already here can create a flow of new illegals to cross and claim that they were already here.


This seems like a plausible claim, but I've never seen any actual evidence one way or the other. Anyone know if the rate of illegal immigration increased following previous grants of amnesty?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:35 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
I'm going to have to chew on this a bit, but this seems to be something you're looking for RD (note the INS report embedded):
http://www.cis.org/articles/2000/ins1986amnesty.html

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:24 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Well considering there are once again so many of them that we once again have to consider amnesty should point to that we didn't get it right last time.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:48 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Rorinthas wrote:
Well considering there are once again so many of them that we once again have to consider amnesty should point to that we didn't get it right last time.


Of course not, when you grant amnesty as a matter of policy you create incentivisation for more illegal immigration in the hopes that it might be granted again.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Rorinthas wrote:
If you don't secure the border first, legalizing those already here solves no real problems.


Man its almost like we tried that before, oh yeah because we have and it didn't solve anything.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Quote:
Obama risks angering a growing, politically potent Latino constituency if he defers the goal until 2011.

Well, duh!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Elmarnieh wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If you don't secure the border first, legalizing those already here solves no real problems.


Man its almost like we tried that before, oh yeah because we have and it didn't solve anything.

When exactly did we secure the border?

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
Quote:
Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation.


Do what we say, or you'll have the same penalty if you didnt do as we say! :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 476
Location: The 10th circle
Screeling wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If you don't secure the border first, legalizing those already here solves no real problems.


Man its almost like we tried that before, oh yeah because we have and it didn't solve anything.

When exactly did we secure the border?


Not sure but I think Elmo's referring to trying amnesty before and it not working.

Also, I hate statements like this -

Quote:
Obama risks angering a growing, politically potent Latino constituency if he defers the goal until 2011


While it contains a sad political and social commentary, isn't it kind of like saying

Quote:
The President risks angering a growing, politically potent Muslim constituency if he decides to prosecute terrorists.
(And that's merely an analogy to highlight illegality and association, not the proportionality of crimes)

If a group is angered over not allowing people to break the just laws of this country and enter unchecked and en masse, only because they look or think the same as them, then that group should hold no sway. Not to mention, that quote from the article is a generalization at best, as there are legal citizens who are Latino who don't support illegal immigration, we just don't really know what percentage they are.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:48 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Quote:
The President risks angering a growing, politically potent Serial Killer constituency if he decides to prosecute Serial Killers.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:15 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Müs wrote:
Quote:
The President risks angering a growing, politically potent Serial Killer constituency if he decides to prosecute Serial Killers.


While the point is well taken, it should be pointed out that serial killers would be an absurdly small group, don't have communities or organizations that would push them to vote a certain way, and aren't prosecuted by the Federal government anyhow.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:25 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Diamondeye wrote:
Müs wrote:
Quote:
The President risks angering a growing, politically potent Serial Killer constituency if he decides to prosecute Serial Killers.


While the point is well taken, it should be pointed out that serial killers would be an absurdly small group, don't have communities or organizations that would push them to vote a certain way, and aren't prosecuted by the Federal government anyhow.


Yeah yeah. ;)

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Not to mention most of them are non-voting felons

the killers i mean, not the illegals

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group