Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
I went to two high schools, the staff at the first was totally incompetent at it, the staff at the second was very good at it. I should probably point out that the administration of the first was totally incompetent at basically everything else, the student body had absolutely no respect for them whatsoever. I'm honestly still baffled at how a school administration can be as incompetent as my first high school one's was, especially since it wasn't a poor area. They had plenty of money. It was worse than some movie-portrayed exaggerations of incompetent administrations.
Lack of accountability. It doesn't matter how rich your district is if there's no motivation to excel or means to give you the boot for not performing adequately.
Ironically, some of the stupidity started as a response to the fact that they were losing students by the truckload to the local Catholic school. The first thing was the new grading system, they axed the standard 90/80/70/60 A/B/C/D 4.0 GPA scale and replaced it. The new system was that 94-100 was an A, 87-94 was a B, 79-87 was a C, and 70-79 was a D. In "exchange" for this they put everyone on a five point scale. (an A was worth 5.0) This let them advertise the fact that an A at their school was "harder" to get and therefore the school must be better, even though they didn't change anything but the scale. Of course, this change also had the effect of torpedoing the college chances of the entire student body, as colleges would generally not bother to research this system and would just look at the letters. Many people got Bs and Cs but thought they were doing great because their "GPA" was 3.5, and a 3.5 is really good, right? Nope, now you can't get into a good college, sucks to be you.
I'm not sure whose idea the collective punishment thing was or why they did it, but the administration decided it would be a great idea to use it for EVERYTHING. It got to the point where individuals were not even penalized for tardiness, instead each class had an allowed amount of tardies for everyone and if the class went over everyone got punished. As a side effect of doing collective punishment for everything, they stopped caring about finding out who was actually guilty when rules were violated. They just blamed the closest person whenever they got there and then justified it to them by saying they'd get the same punishment anyways regardless of who they found to be guilty. This led to a massive amount of contempt by the students for the administration, and there was absolutely massive amounts of vandalism. One week, the fire alarm was pulled 20 times. The library got set on fire in another incident, and once some students broke in at night and put crazy glue in the locks of every door in the building, forcing the school to replace all of them. They tried to respond to this with their collective punishment tactics, but since it was a public school in a fairly wealthy area there wasn't a whole lot they could actually DO to the students. First they tried closing all the bathrooms. As in, students were not allowed to use the bathroom on campus while school was in session. Next in response to the fire alarm thing, they made the entire student body stay after normal dismissal. This might have worked except one official thought it was an incredible idea to not allow students to leave even if their parents showed up to fetch them. I swear I am not making this up, they had teachers take him from his regular class and moved him to another room so his parents could not find him. They had to drop the "detention for the entire student body" thing after the fallout from that.
I never actually got to see how this ended, we moved away when the stupid was still in full force. I've heard that the school and administration are much better now, but I have no idea how it actually started improving.