Almost exactly the words I used when I shared the article with my wife
| The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
| Thank me later men https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=9413 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | TheRiov [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Thank me later men |
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... ssion.html Nsfw for subject mater only. |
|
| Author: | Müs [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Mind = Blown |
|
| Author: | FarSky [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Looks like that's not all that's getting blown! #heyooo |
|
| Author: | Talya [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Huh. |
|
| Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh, now I see why this is in Heckfire. It also suggests we cruicified a Congressional candidate for commenting on a politically uncomfortable but apparently legitimately plausible scientific theory... Original Post's article wrote: Other recent findings from Gallup’s laboratory suggest that semen-exposed women perform better on concentration and cognitive tasks and that women’s bodies can detect 'foreign' semen that differs from their long-term or recurrent sexual partner’s signature semen.
They suggest the ability to detect foreign sources is an evolved system that often leads to unsuccessful pregnancies - via greater risk of preeclampsia - because it signals a disinvested male partner who is not as likely to provide for the offspring. |
|
| Author: | Lenas [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Thank me later men |
Well he still had a key misunderstanding of the theory, which is that a woman's body can only defend against rape pregnancy if she's already got a long-term partner. Which says nothing about the possibility of being raped by said partner. |
|
| Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Look, I'm not defending the guy. I'm just revelling in the delicious irony inherent in the situation of the Democrats attacking a Republican for trying (even unsuccessfully) to base his policy on science. |
|
| Author: | TheRiov [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It was the phrase "legitimate rape" that got people's tempers boiling not his misunderstanding of the science. The phrase contains the implication that most rapes are false or that women should be blamed if they got pregnant from rape |
|
| Author: | NephyrS [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
TheRiov wrote: It was the phrase "legitimate rape" that got people's tempers boiling not his misunderstanding of the science. The phrase contains the implication that most rapes are false or that women should be blamed if they got pregnant from rape This. It wasn't the idea that a woman had a greater chance of not getting pregnant from rape (or with an non-involved partner, or a number of other things) but rather the implication that if she did get pregnant, it was because she wanted to. A biological bias towards something not happening does not equate to a "choice". |
|
| Author: | Talya [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
None of the previous five posts are really continuing in the spirit of the original post. I am not sure if I should show this article to my husband. "You know, Jackie, you seem a little down today. Here. I'll take care of you..." |
|
| Author: | NephyrS [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Almost exactly the words I used when I shared the article with my wife
|
|
| Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
TheRiov wrote: It was the phrase "legitimate rape" that got people's tempers boiling not his misunderstanding of the science. The phrase contains the implication that most rapes are false or that women should be blamed if they got pregnant from rape It doesn't contain the implication that most rapes are false. It contains the implication that there is a nontrivial instance of false rape accusation, which is true. Just like any other "violence against women" issue, however, the left can't allow any discussion of that because it would destroy the ability to use it to paint the right the way they want to. Cases like Tawana Brawley and the Duke Rape Case represent things that happen every day in this country. I've had soldiers in my unit accused of mass rape of a female whose story came apart in less than a quarter of an hour of just trying to take a basic police report. The right really needs to stop apologizing for incidents like the "legitimate rape" one aside from acknowledging the man's poor phrasing. When these comments are met with outrage, the right needs to start telling the outraged to shut the **** up, and that these sorts of attempts to say "you can only talk about rape the way we say is acceptable because we are [allegedly] rape victims" will no longer be treated as serious. Rape is a crime like any other crime and it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. |
|
| Author: | Talya [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Look, stop taking a perfectly good thread about the mental health benefits of cum-swallowing and making it about idiotic partisan political posturing. |
|
| Author: | FarSky [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Talya wrote: partisan political posturing. Now there's a mouthful that won't make you feel nearly as good! #heyooo My posts in this thread are meant to be read in a '30s vaudevillian voice. Someone stop me. |
|
| Author: | TheRiov [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Apparently both parties get a happy ending. |
|
| Author: | Müs [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Re: |
FarSky wrote: Talya wrote: partisan political posturing. Now there's a mouthful that won't make you feel nearly as good! #heyooo My posts in this thread are meant to be read in a '30s vaudevillian voice. Someone stop me. I've been reading them as Ed McMahon. |
|
| Author: | darksiege [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have been reading them with a Groucho Marx sound to them |
|
| Author: | Müs [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Or Fozzie Bear. WAKA WAKA WAKA! |
|
| Author: | Hopwin [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Does this also work on gay dudes? |
|
| Author: | TheRiov [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Hopwin wrote: Does this also work on gay dudes? Fozzie bear voice? Yes |
|
| Author: | Raell [ Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Hopwin wrote: Does this also work on gay dudes? Ask Elmo... |
|
| Author: | Hopwin [ Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Raell wrote: Hopwin wrote: Does this also work on gay dudes? Ask Elmo... He scares me. Wait which Elmo? On second thought, doesn't matter, they both scare me. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|