Aizle wrote:
In general, if you need supliments to recover well from a work out or be prepared for a workout, then you have dietary issues that you need to address.
Some athletes have a training regimen that dieting simply will not allow them to compete at. Professional fighters, for example, mostly plan around training as hard as physically possible without depleting their health before the bout. This is why PED's are so prevalent despite regulations against; not because they allow one man to rip another limb from limb, that's complete fiction. It's because most PED's (anabolics, TRT, insulin to some extent, HGH to some extent) boost recovery cycles to where athletes can train in marathon like environments day in and day out without slowly depleting their health. Think of running 8 miles, doing 2 hours of live grappling, strength and condition, drills, pliometrics, calisthenics, and live sparring. Most guys train 2-4 of those things for a total of 6-8 hours a day 7 days a week. It would be impossible without supplementation of some kind, even if it's only simple as concentrated sources amino acids or vitamins that can be eaten. Try eating 200+g of protein per day through food alone.
Now, if no one used PED's, then yes, athletes would train less strenuously and the level of competition would simply diminish across the board. Some athletes do compete without PED's and simply rest the interval and use sheer given athleticism, talent and skill to compensate for gaps in conditioning and strength. Some athletes are able to just destroy themselves and keep going at that pace if only for a few months.
Who is to define what a "supplement" is and what a natural food is? Are prepared foods "natural?" Should everyone eat a paleo-diet? What is the substantial difference between naturally occurring foods, prepared foods, dietary nutritional supplements and performance supplements? This is why the TRT debate is so tricky. Some people argue it's a way to replenish naturally depleted testosterone levels due to age to a "normal" level. But shouldn't that be the penalty of age? And what level is "normal". Should people be allowed to be medicated to the level of the most anabolic laden rookie athletes?
There are workout circuits some choose to engage in that are beyond the capacity for what is considered a "natural" diet to support.