Can: Serving Size: 8.3 fl oz (245mL), Servings 1, Calories 120,
Total Fat 0g, Sodium 5mg, Total Carb 30g, Sugar 29g, Protein 0g, Vitamin C 100%

Bottle: Serving Size 8 fl oz (240mL), Servings 1.5, Calories 126,
Total Fat 0g, Sodium 14mg, Total Carb 34g, Sugar 31g, Protein 0g, Vitamin C 100%

HFCS = the devil. I can't believe there are commercials on TV actually advocating it.

Assuming it's real fruit juice, I would think the body would have an easier time breaking down the sugars that are present..

How is it any worse than cane sugar?

In the study “High –fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: Increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levels,”(1) the authors failed to put into perspective the excessive amount consumed by the rats in their experimental design. Translating the study’s reported rat intakes to human proportions, the calories gained from high fructose corn syrup would be equivalent to about 3000 kcal/day all from that single source. In comparison, adult humans consume about 2,000 calories per day from all dietary sources. Such intake levels for the study animals would be the equivalent of humans drinking a total of 20 cans of 12 ounce sodas per day - a highly unrealistic amount. Moreover, the researchers concluded that the rats gained more weight from high fructose corn syrup than they would have from sugar, yet the researchers had no proper basis for drawing this conclusion since they failed to provide sucrose controls for part of the study’s short-term experiments and no sucrose controls whatsoever were present in any of the long-term experiments.

High fructose corn syrup has become one of the boogeymen of processed foods. The Corn Refiners Association is probably right in noting that it has no known special risk compared to table sugar. While it has been implicated in a rise of Type 2 diabetes, obesity, and other health problems, high-fructose corn syrup and white sugar are almost identical chemically; each is about half fructose and half glucose.

The association between high-fructose corn syrup and obesity may reflect that we consume so much of it. Nearly all sugars add empty calories to our diets. And because high fructose corn syrup is the main sweetener in most soft drinks and a common one in other foods (including breakfast cereals, salad dressings, cheese spreads, yogurts, jams, and peanut butter, among others), many people may just consume more of it then other sugars. But that doesn’t mean that there’s definitely no added risk from fructose in general. A new study of rats by researchers from the University of Florida suggests that a diet high in fructose may lead the body to develop a resistance to a protein called leptin, which helps control appetite. More research is needed to fully understand the relationship.

I thought this article seemed fair:http://blogs.consumerreports.org/health/2008/10/high-fructose-c.html

Basically says that HFCS should be fine in moderation but its in so many things that its difficult to limit consumption and that even though it seems to have the same make-up as sugar, there are a few signs that indicate more research is needed before coming to any conclusions to its safety.

Your link comes from a group with a financial interest in discrediting the study, and still doesn't disprove the portion I linked, which states that even with identical caloric intakes rats gain more when consuming HFCS than when consuming sucrose. And while they didn't control with sucrose for the long term studies they DID in the short-term.

"The first study showed that male rats given water sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup in addition to a standard diet of rat chow gained much more weight than male rats that received water sweetened with table sugar, or sucrose, in conjunction with the standard diet. The concentration of sugar in the sucrose solution was the same as is found in some commercial soft drinks, while the high-fructose corn syrup solution was half as concentrated as most sodas."

Your link comes from a group with a financial interest in discrediting the study...

And while they didn't control with sucrose for the long term studies they DID in the short-term.

...even with identical caloric intakes rats gain more when consuming HFCS than when consuming sucrose.