The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Frozen https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10611 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Talya [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Frozen |
Spoiler: Placeholder for when I go see this tomorrow night. (Happy, Khross?) |
Author: | FarSky [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
I've had company ever since Wednesday, so I've had no time to myself to write, but Phe and I saw it Saturday and bloody loved it. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good. I thought it looked interesting, and was hoping it'd turn out well. Still need to see Catching Fire, too. |
Author: | Khross [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
I feel that this may be the best Princess Movie ever. |
Author: | Talya [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I have my tickets purchased for tomorrow night! |
Author: | Serienya [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
We really enjoyed it. |
Author: | FarSky [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: Good. I thought it looked interesting, and was hoping it'd turn out well. Still need to see Catching Fire, too. Don't want to derail, but also very good. Fixed all of the problems if the first film. Frozen and Tangled are proof that Disney sucks at selling its princess animations nowadays (I think because they're girl-shy). Both looked utterly rancid from the promo materials (particularly Frozen, whose trailers and posters posited a comic relief character that appeared to give Jar Jar Binks a run for his money in the annoyance department), but both were excellent. |
Author: | Serienya [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
FarSky wrote: (particularly Frozen, whose trailers and posters posited a comic relief character that appeared to give Jar Jar Binks a run for his money in the annoyance department), but both were excellent. Yeah, Olaf is pretty annoying. I didn't find him endearing at all. The marketing definitely left a lot to be desired. |
Author: | FarSky [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
I didn't mind him in the context of the film, but the marketing materials were selling a totally different movie. |
Author: | Serienya [ Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
FarSky wrote: I didn't mind him in the context of the film, but the marketing materials were selling a totally different movie. He wasn't as annoying as in the promo spots, that is true. The movie was NOT what I'd expected going into it. It was rather refreshing to be a little surprised for once. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Olaf was far less irritating than I expected. Story and animation were spectacular. Music was mixed, and sadly forgettable... I don't have a single tune from the movie left in my head this morning, can't remember them at all. Robert and Kristen Lopez are, unfortunately, not Alan Menken. Speaking of the music, Kristen Bell wasn't completely out of her league singing alongside Idina Menzel, which surprised me. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
On a more detailed note, I love the way it blew away several common Disney Animated Feature tropes with extreme prejudice. For instance, Spoiler: |
Author: | Hopwin [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
FarSky wrote: Kaffis Mark V wrote: Good. I thought it looked interesting, and was hoping it'd turn out well. Still need to see Catching Fire, too. Don't want to derail, but also very good. Fixed all of the problems if the first film. Frozen and Tangled are proof that Disney sucks at selling its princess animations nowadays (I think because they're girl-shy). Both looked utterly rancid from the promo materials (particularly Frozen, whose trailers and posters posited a comic relief character that appeared to give Jar Jar Binks a run for his money in the annoyance department), but both were excellent. Based on the box office numbers I think they are doing fine. Disney has apparently reached the point where they don't even need to spend a second thinking about their promo materials and will still close the weekend #1 just on the brand name. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
Hopwin wrote: Based on the box office numbers I think they are doing fine. Disney has apparently reached the point where they don't even need to spend a second thinking about their promo materials and will still close the weekend #1 just on the brand name. Disney needs to fire their entire motion picture marketing department. Sure, Frozen and Tangled did well at the box office. But animated movies usually do well at christmas. Hell, this is a Disney animated movie called Frozen released at christmas. You could market it with an ice-sculpture of a giant turd and it would sell 300 million in tickets. That's not the point. The movies John Carter and The Lone Ranger are examples of why their marketing is brutally bad. I found them both to be immensely entertaining -- they hit their targets dead center, and yet nobody went to see them. |
Author: | Lenas [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
John Carter's box office numbers were super disappointing, I saw it in 3D and had a great time. Underrated movie, right there. |
Author: | Corolinth [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Unfortunately for Disney, brand name appeal only really works when you're doing brand name things. So their animated features will do well without marketing because they're Disney animated features. Anything else is going to take, because the kids watching the Disney channel and listening to Disney radio really don't want to see things that aren't animated. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Corolinth wrote: Unfortunately for Disney, brand name appeal only really works when you're doing brand name things. So their animated features will do well without marketing because they're Disney animated features. Anything else is going to take, because the kids watching the Disney channel and listening to Disney radio really don't want to see things that aren't animated. Maleficent appears to have some intelligent marketing behind it. |
Author: | Serienya [ Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
Lenas wrote: John Carter's box office numbers were super disappointing, I saw it in 3D and had a great time. Underrated movie, right there. I think it did pretty darn well overseas, though. If they'd marketed it as the granddaddy of modern sci-fi... |
Author: | Talya [ Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frozen |
Serienya wrote: Lenas wrote: John Carter's box office numbers were super disappointing, I saw it in 3D and had a great time. Underrated movie, right there. I think it did pretty darn well overseas, though. If they'd marketed it as the granddaddy of modern sci-fi... Not enough to save it from costing Disney 150 million dollars. Fortunately The Avengers more than made up for John Carter and The Lone Ranger's losses put together. |
Author: | Lonedar [ Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Saw it this past weekend, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Managed to have strong female characters without resorting to making all the male characters idiots (ala Brave). Managed to have strong male characters without resorting to making all the female characters helpless (ala traditional princess movies). I liked that. I found Olaf to be the anti Jar Jar. I liked that too. My daughter made it clear she wants to see it again. My sons gave it two thumbs enthusiastically sideways--which means they liked it despite being a princess movie. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Saw it with some friends tonight. Pretty solid. (Hmm. Or is a movie named Frozen better described as "pretty and solid"?) I won't comment on the memorability of the songs, as I'm mostly crap for remembering Disney songs in general. It was refreshing to not cater to all the aging and dated Disney princess tropes about love, yes. But what impressed me most was that it was a simply gorgeous bit of animation. While I don't remember much about the song, the set and choreography for the number where Elsa raises her crystal castle was amazing. I'm not usually one to go on about Disney magic and whatnot, but that was a scene that really evoked a powerful sense of, well, magic. |
Author: | Talya [ Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: While I don't remember much about the song, the set and choreography for the number where Elsa raises her crystal castle was amazing. I'm not usually one to go on about Disney magic and whatnot, but that was a scene that really evoked a powerful sense of, well, magic. Here, courtesy of Disney: song, set AND choreography for where Elsa raises her crystal castle... |
Author: | Müs [ Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I loved the movie, and the scene where Elsa goes ape-shit was awesome. I agree with everything here, with the additional note: I watched with two young children and one thing that the movie fails at, with regards to young children, is that there is no villain. Normally in Disney movies it's overly obvious and easy to follow, but neither of my children where able to really follow that aspect of it. |
Author: | Corolinth [ Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
There's a definite villain in Frozen. It's telegraphed fairly early on, but younger viewers are less likely to pick up on it until the Big Reveal. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |