| The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
| Clash of the Titans https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2506 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Loki [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Clash of the Titans |
...was, like the original version, quite terrible. Having realized it would be bad before hand, my friends and I laughed our way through the whole thing. If you expect cheese, it's got loads of it. If you're expecting a good movie, stay away. |
|
| Author: | Raell [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yea, after reading nothing but bad reviews I figured I would wait. One bad movie a year is enough for me. |
|
| Author: | Elessar [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Raell wrote: Yea, after reading nothing but bad reviews I figured I would wait. One bad movie a year is enough for me. What was the bad movie so far? |
|
| Author: | Raell [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cop Out... |
|
| Author: | Rynar [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
What if you loved the origional? |
|
| Author: | Loki [ Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Rynar wrote: What if you loved the origional? If you thought the first one was actually a good movie, you probably won't like this one. If you thought the first movie was hilarious, you'll laugh at this one too, for some of the same reasons. Basically it's terrible. Spoiler: |
|
| Author: | Nitefox [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What was so horrible about this movie? My son and I just got back and both enjoyed it. It's a special effects action flick with a Greek mythology theme. Were folks expecting something else? |
|
| Author: | Caleria [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Nitefox wrote: What was so horrible about this movie? My son and I just got back and both enjoyed it. It's a special effects action flick with a Greek mythology theme. Were folks expecting something else? QFT I didn't see what was wrong with it. I enjoyed it myself. It wasn't an accurate portrayal of Greek Mythology, but neither was the first. It was a good action flick, with decent characters, and IMHO, very good special effects. As much as I loved the first one, it is pretty painful to try and watch these days. It hasn't aged well at all. I would not have a problem watching this one again. I could definitely see myself buying this one when it comes out on DVD. |
|
| Author: | Kirra [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I want to see this too, thought the trailers looked good. Why didn't you like it, Loki? Ps I do like cheese though soo.. 
|
|
| Author: | Raltar [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 8:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I just got back from seeing it. Good movie. Exactly what I was expecting. |
|
| Author: | Gilraen [ Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
I remember the original version of this movie, made in the early 80s (I think). The fight between Perseus and Medusa was the best part, thanks to Harryhausen. The only other thing that sticks in my mind about that movie was that Perseus had a mechanical owl named Buboe as a sidekick. Yeah, name your greek mythology pet machine after a swollen lymph node; that'll draw me right in. Haven't seen the new one yet. I've read that I should skip the 3-D, since they added it in afterwards and the effect isn't worth the extra moola for a 3-D ticket. |
|
| Author: | Ladas [ Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Gilraen wrote: Yeah, name your greek mythology pet machine after a swollen lymph node; that'll draw me right in. Or it could be that Bubo is a genus name for owls... |
|
| Author: | Gilraen [ Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Quote: Or it could be that Bubo is a genus name for owls... I know that now, because I looked it up. But how many people would know that off the top of their head? My main complaint was that is was a mechanical owl. In a greek mythology setting. But it was a Harryhausen movie so I mostly forgave all that. |
|
| Author: | Ladas [ Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Gilraen wrote: I know that now, because I looked it up. But how many people would know that off the top of their head? Probably about as many people as would know it could also refer to a swollen lymph node. I suspect 90% of the people that saw the movie assumed it was a term of endearment or just a name. For those that are familiar with greek mythology, specifically Hephaestus, a mechanical owl would not be out of place. Of course, automatons existed during the Hellenistic period anyway. |
|
| Author: | darksiege [ Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Gilraen wrote: My main complaint was that is was a mechanical owl. In a greek mythology setting. I would take it you are unfamiliar with Hephaestus; expecially in the Movie Baron Munchausen then? |
|
| Author: | Gilraen [ Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Quote: I would take it you are unfamiliar with Hephaestus Quote: For those that are familiar with greek mythology, specifically Hephaestus, a mechanical owl would not be out of place. Of course, automatons existed during the Hellenistic period anyway. I actually am fairly familir with greek mythology; I just didn't remember that Hephaestus was in the movie as well. I must've missed that part. It's been a long time since I've seen it. I really just don't remember the mechanical owl from the mythological story of Perseus. I think I saw the owl as an attempt to R2D2 the movie. |
|
| Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't know that Hephaestus was in the movie (I don't remember the original very well, and haven't seen the new one), but he's relatively closely tied to Perseus, regardless. |
|
| Author: | Ladas [ Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Athena ordered Hephaestus to make the mechanical duplicate of her pet owl, rather than give the pet to Perseus as she was ordered by Zeus. But even if he wasn't in the movie, the concept, and actual implementation, of automatons existed in Hellenistic Greece, and that ability was often linked with Hephaestus. I don't recall that particular mechanical owl from more traditional myth either, but the concept existed and was a "realistic" story line (realistic in it was derived from the time period and abilities of the myth). |
|
| Author: | Serienya [ Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
We had to see it in 3D, as the theatre we picked only had it that way. (We were short on time and it's almost impossible to find free nights.) 3D effects were almost negligible - more were in the credits than the rest of the movie, or so it seemed. I was disappointed that the goddesses didn't get even a single line in the movie. Some Athena action would have been nice. |
|
| Author: | Hopwin [ Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Worst movie ever. |
|
| Author: | TheRiov [ Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Caleria wrote: It wasn't an accurate portrayal of Greek Mythology, but neither was the first. I had this objection for the longest time about stuff like Disney's Hercules too. But it was pointed out, quite accuratly, that these myths themselves dont form a coherent mythos. There is no single source for anything, no canon, and it was traditional to retell the stories in many different ways and the events/characters were changed. These 'modern retellings' are as much in the spirit of the original mythology as anything. |
|
| Author: | Lydiaa [ Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I liked it... lots of special effects and blood and gore... Totally mindless, just how I like my movies ^-^ |
|
| Author: | Rodahn [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
LTTP, but finally Netflixed it. Enjoyable, but . . . safe. Very nice visual effects, but the movie felt short, like they were trying to rush it. And what happened to: Spoiler: So yeah, enjoyable, if not chopped down to be more palatable. |
|
| Author: | Numbuk [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Visually very fun. Story-wise, was a little weak BTW: Blink and you'll miss Dr. Julian Bashir. |
|
| Author: | darksiege [ Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Clash of the Titans |
Numbuk wrote: BTW: Blink and you'll miss Dr. Julian Bashir. Oh yeah... he was that guy who did that thing... I have apparently missed him every time I see the movie. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
