The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

Mama
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9131
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Nitefox [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:48 am ]
Post subject:  Mama


Author:  Mookhow [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:49 am ]
Post subject: 

I saw this trailer before Resident Evil on Sunday. I was like "no thanks!"

Author:  FarSky [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:38 am ]
Post subject: 

WANT.

Author:  Gilraen [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

I don't know why I went into this thread thinking it was a remake of I Remember Mama. Too much caffeine for me today. Or perhaps not enough.

Author:  Aethien [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wow. I don't know that I could see that in a dark theater. I experienced repeated chills just watching this video, in a well-let room in broad daylight. Maybe an outdoor matinee. Maybe.

Author:  darksiege [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

looks different...

Author:  Numbuk [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

Looks like it's going down the same path of the type of scary movies I enjoy. But I am not sure if it will complete it's journey along that path, or if it will eventually veer off. My gut says the latter may happen.

I like psychological horror far more than any other type. Let my brain do the work and it's guaranteed it will do a far better job than anything you can throw at me visually. Monster movies are more like the "dumb, popcorn, turn-off-your-brain action movie" to me. They are fun and have their place in my library, but they aren't my special favorites. This movie looks like it could turn into a monster movie from a psychological horror beginning.

I remain very guardedly optimistic. That, and the word "mama" kind of detracts from a horror buildup for me. It just doesn't sound scary, even when whispered by a creepy little girl.

Author:  Nitefox [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

If Guillermo del Toro has anything to do with it, I'd bet the milk money it will be done well.

Author:  Numbuk [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Nitefox wrote:
If Guillermo del Toro has anything to do with it, I'd bet the milk money it will be done well.


If he directed it, then yes I would agree. But he's not directing it, he's involved with producing it. Which typically means, "My name is attached so I can make a return from my investment in it, but I won't have really anything at all to do with the movie."

Author:  FarSky [ Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

Del Toro is as hands-on with his producing as his protégés request. Having his name attached generally is a seal of quality, as all of the GdT-produced films I've seen have been at worst solid and interesting ('Julia's Eyes') and at best fantastic ('The Orphanage').

Author:  Raltar [ Sun Jul 07, 2013 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

This movie was **** terrible. Wasn't even remotely scary and had the stupidest ending I've ever seen in my entire life. What a waste of time.

Author:  Nitefox [ Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

Raltar wrote:
This movie was **** terrible. Wasn't even remotely scary and had the stupidest ending I've ever seen in my entire life. What a waste of time.



I liked it but thought the ending sucked.

Author:  Rodahn [ Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

The original:

(Skip to time stamp 0:50)


Author:  Numbuk [ Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mama

Sooo.... not as good as The Orphanage and I should skip this one?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/