The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
EQ Next https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=10033 |
Page 1 of 14 |
Author: | Lenas [ Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | EQ Next |
Is officially being shown August 2nd at SOE Live. Apparently it will be playable. John Smedley tweeted this pic earlier today, which is apparently the first confirmed look at EQN's art direction: Spoiler: |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nice. I've been quite interested to see where they go with it. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
MMORPG.com says that EQNext, what they saw behind closed doors, was the best thing they saw in all of E3. http://www.mmorpg.com/showFeature.cfm/l ... 501/page/1 Quote: Say what? You thought this one wasn’t at E3? Well, really... it wasn’t in any official capacity. But we were treated to an early look at what SOE has planned for the game’s unveiling in August and we were quite simply blown away by every little detail we saw. This is going to sound like a cop-out, but we can't say why we are choosing EQN as our Best of Show because we've been sworn to secrecy until the big debut in August. What we can say is that we saw grand plans for the world's largest sandbox and it was more than enough to stand head and shoulders above any game we saw at E3. When Sony pulls back the curtain later this summer, you will not be disappointed. EverQuest Next is this year's E3 Best of Show, and in just a couple months you'll all understand why. We promise.
|
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Sandbox, huh? If they pull off procedurally generated (and thus unspoilable/guideable) quest content that could be pretty awesome. The thing that annoys me about modern MMOs is the carefully tailored story they're meant to take you through -- that everybody else experiences identically. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
I think they mean sandbox in the sense of destructible environments, etc., things people can influence. Smed has gone on record talking about maybe a really powerful wizard player accidentally burning down a forest with a big spell. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
You'd still need the procedurally-generated stuff in that case, since the "grand storyline" for everyone else would be jacked right up by the wizard burning down the forest - or else the forest would respawn quickly, leaving the wizard's actions as inconsequential as always. The fact that they're even thinking "sandbox" fills me with optimism. The "progression raid" crowd is totally out of control across the MMO industry in general, and its high time MMO makers start making MMOs where players have to do something other than play the damage meter and the gearscore add-on. |
Author: | Lenas [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
The game is now officially named EverQuest Next Also, rumors: Spoiler: |
Author: | Müs [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
So (EQ + VG+ EVE)*(new graphics). Hmms... could be interesting. |
Author: | Lenas [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
The Little Big Planet style dungeon maker sounds pretty cool. 99% should be rejected, but I bet the player base will make some real gems. Could be infinite content. I just wonder what the players would be allowed to give you as rewards, if they can create their own loot tables, or if Sony is going to be the ones deciding for the sake of balance. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd probably play that. What was the source, though, for the quote? |
Author: | Lenas [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
I can't find an actual source unfortunately. Well, we can still use the ideas as talking points. |
Author: | Raltar [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
With the EVE like features that are rumored, this is going to be a pvp only MMO? That doesn't sound like a good idea at all. |
Author: | Lenas [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
I'm starting to think that's just someone's wish list and not a real rumor. I don't see SOE going PVP-centric. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
Lenas wrote: I'm starting to think that's just someone's wish list and not a real rumor. I don't see SOE going PVP-centric. That was my other thought, too, yeah. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
I don't think it would be EVE's level of pvp-centric, since other than massive supercapital battles, most pvp in EVE is really just ganking. That works in EVE (sort of, the difference between a pve and a pvp combat ship is a major encouragement to gank) mainly because your character and your ship are not the same thing. In a fantasy MMO, it wouldn't work except as a very niche game. There would need to be some effective way to make ganking and griefing hard. |
Author: | Lenas [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
Okay, here we are... Almost time to find out what's true and what's bull. SOE Live starts today and there will allegedly be some EQN news tonight during the 7pm PST keynote. The official announcement / reveal is tomorrow at noon PST. After the 90 minute announcement there are also 7 hours or so of panel discussions planned for the game, so tomorrow should be pretty exciting. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm looking forward to it. I'm hoping the MMO track at D*Con has an EQNext panel or two. Well, it'll probably be an SOE Panel, but here's hoping they've got fun stuff to show/talk about with EQ Next and it's not just all Planetside 2 stuff, since the community and direction they took the gameplay there didn't appeal to me. |
Author: | FarSky [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So, if you go to their website, you see this image, with the text "Fantasy artist Gabor Szikszai has reinterpreted Keith Parkinson's original EverQuest masterpiece in the style of EverQuest Next." Here's the original box art for reference. So, am I to assume they got rid of Erudites? If so, WTF? |
Author: | Midgen [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
RACIST!! |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nah. They're classist against Enchanters. Edit: They also ditched the Ogre for a Vah Shir. But that's a pretty cool art style. The Dark Elf is kind of eye-roll worthy, but Firiona looks like an okay modernization. The dragon and Vah Shir look pretty badass. |
Author: | Lenas [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
If you assume that they got rid of Erudites, you must also assume by the same logic that they're getting rid of Halflings and Wood Elves... which I don't see happening. Hard to tell if that little creature is a ratonga or a kobold... current rumor is on kobolds. Kaffis Mark V wrote: Edit: They also ditched the Ogre for a Vah Shir. Negative. Homeboy with the axe is an ogre. Also, that Vah Shir is a Kerran. |
Author: | FarSky [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
Lenas wrote: If you assume that they got rid of Erudites, you must also assume by the same logic that they're getting rid of Halflings and Wood Elves... which I don't see happening. Hard to tell if that little creature is a ratonga or a kobold... current rumor is on kobolds. My guess is that they got rid of Halflings and...I dunno, I think that other missing character was a Half-Elf. Looks like they're shuffling the Troll out in favor of a Vah Shir. Maybe this isn't indicative of the final game's character options, but given the text on the website, I would guess that it is (or, at least, representative of their replacements). I guess we'll know tomorrow? |
Author: | Lenas [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: EQ Next |
I see no reason to get rid of Halflings... Gnomes aren't in the picture either, but you can bet your *** they'll be in-game. |
Author: | FarSky [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Eff your Web Ninja edits! |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Okay, then they ditched Trolls, then, right? Potato, potato on the Kerran. I went for Vah Shir because they were built much more heroically, proportion-wise. Though, I suppose calling it a Kerran means no Luclin if they're hewing close to EQ Original's lore as a starting point. I like that there's still a definite sense of racial alliances in that picture. |
Page 1 of 14 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |