The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:38 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
I will say Apple's hardware is pretty resistant to abuse. I've been using my old 3GS sans SIM card for a while now and despite getting exposed to sub-freezing temperatures, running in down pours and getting destroyed in my pocket completely tacoing a handrail at Keystone, it still works.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:23 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Rafael wrote:
I will say Apple's hardware is pretty resistant to abuse. I've been using my old 3GS sans SIM card for a while now and despite getting exposed to sub-freezing temperatures, running in down pours and getting destroyed in my pocket completely tacoing a handrail at Keystone, it still works.

Image
Rafael wrote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:25 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Sans SIM card. That means he's using it as an mp3 player.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Oh yeah, these too.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:56 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
http://www.macworld.com/article/1168394 ... laint.html

I'm seriously starting to hate Apple. Whereas before I merely disliked them, they're starting to make me feel active antipathy.

Image

Cause yeah... they're exactly the same.

Quote:
Galaxy Phones
The Samsung smartphones named in the complaint are: Galaxy S III - Verizon, Galaxy Note, Galaxy S II Skyrocket, Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S II, Galaxy S II - T-Mobile, Galaxy S II - AT&T, Galaxy Nexus, Illusion, Captivate Glide, Exhibit II 4G, Stratosphere, Transform Ultra, Admire, Conquer 4G, and Dart. Other devices covered by the filing are the Galaxy Player 4.0 and Galaxy Player 5.0 media players, and the Galaxy Note 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and Galaxy Tab 8.9 tablets.


Seriously Apple. **** you.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
They don't care if you hate them. Once they've put everyone else out of business, you'll still be buying their products...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Heh, the only Apple product I have is an ancient 8g iPod Touch.

Thinking about getting rid of it and just using my phone.

Which I'll be upgrading to a GS3 as soon as I can.

Edit:

Because I didn't feel like making a new post.



This dude? Toolbox.

Got the interview from this article:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 2510525390

Also: Transcript of the interview
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19425051

Dude has a fundamental misunderstanding of "prior art" and fobbed his definition off on the jury at large. Because of this dude, Sammy has a huge case on appeal. I hope he keeps talking. I love this guy and I want to patent his babies.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:11 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
In the continuing war between Apple and Samsung, a UK judge found for Samsung and ordered Apple to post on their UK site a disclaimer saying Samsung did not copy Apple. Apple complied, sort of, with the following release, buried at the bottom of their webpage.

Spoiler:
Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Pat ... /1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.


Yesterday, the UK judge came back and told them to rewrite their notice and put it on the front page.

Good times, good times...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Still buried as a link on the footer of http://apple.co.uk is this gem (last paragraph)....

http://www.apple.com/uk/?cid=oas-emeia-domains-apple.co.uk wrote:
However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
This confirms what I've suspected all along. Apple fanbois = wikipedia editors,

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:26 pm 
Offline
Eatin yur toes.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:49 am
Posts: 836
SuiNeko wrote:
Khross wrote:
Just to be clear, I own Apple products; I supported the company; I just bought an rMBP I no longer way because of this ...

I have no problems with people protecting their intellectual property; I have problems with corporations using IP law to abuse competition and create a de facto trust.


Want to offload it second hand? I assume 16gb RAM? ;)


Too late ;-p You didnt get back to me, so I bought my own.

Very happy. Mountain Lion is a significant upgrade over snow leopard, the gestures are f**kin awesome, and for me, moving from a core duo to a quad i7 with 16gb RAM is fantastic... especially as I run virtual machines for win7 and ubuntu (sh, now.) too.

Syncing up my itunes library was the only real pain - I hate getting that library ID the same everywhere.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group