The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Windows 8.1 Update https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10865 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Lenas [ Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Windows 8.1 Update |
Microsoft finally seems to get it. Start bar is now persistent, modern apps can be minimized to taskbar / closed at the top, Start screen has a power button. Lots of small "duh" things that should have made it in a long time ago. Here are the update notes. Rejoice all ye who use a mouse and keyboard, for alongside these changes, the Start menu is also returning in Windows 9. |
Author: | Darkroland [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Lenas wrote: Microsoft finally seems to get it. Start bar is now persistent, modern apps can be minimized to taskbar / closed at the top, Start screen has a power button. Lots of small "duh" things that should have made it in a long time ago. Here are the update notes. Rejoice all ye who use a mouse and keyboard, for alongside these changes, the Start menu is also returning in Windows 9. I'm curious if they'll actually brand it as Windows 9, or if they'll keep trying to revive the tainted Windows 8 brand. It will be interesting in the end how much they'll regress back to Win7. Personally, as a server/network admin, Windows 8 is an administrative nightmare. It also adds several levels of additional user training and more complex steps to both troubleshooting and performing standard tasks users already perform. I honestly think if they're going to continue with the "metro UI" in the future, they need to release an entirely different business version without it available, or allow me to customize the OS and disable it completely. |
Author: | Shelgeyr [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:08 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Couple of things to note:
|
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Shelgeyr wrote: [*]Closing store apps by means of the "x" in the upper right corner does the same thing accomplished by swiping down and off. It closes the UI, but doesn't actually kill the process. Likewise with right-clicking and selecting "close window" from the taskbar.[/list] This leaves me flabbergasted. Why would anybody think this was a good idea? |
Author: | Numbuk [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Author: | Lenas [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Quote: Windows now tombstones applications that you close instead of actually closing them. This way, if you decide that you need to reopen the app, you are dropped in right where you left off. Some of you may be concerned that this new change will be negative on your resources – it won’t be. The operating system will tombstone your apps until the resources are needed again; at which point, the application will fully close.
A perfect analogy is if you know how a hard drive deletes files. When you delete a file on a computer it really isn’t gone – it just appears gone, but remains on the drive until the space is needed. |
Author: | Darkroland [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Lenas wrote: Quote: Windows now tombstones applications that you close instead of actually closing them. This way, if you decide that you need to reopen the app, you are dropped in right where you left off. Some of you may be concerned that this new change will be negative on your resources – it won’t be. The operating system will tombstone your apps until the resources are needed again; at which point, the application will fully close. A perfect analogy is if you know how a hard drive deletes files. When you delete a file on a computer it really isn’t gone – it just appears gone, but remains on the drive until the space is needed. While that does seem like a more modern implementation, there's definitely a resource somewhere notating the "current state" of the application. It may be minimal though. However, yet again, another administrative nightmare. "Yes, I closed the app and re-opened, and the issue is still happening!" "Um, you closed it, but now I need you to bring up your existing apps list, and then drag it to the bottom, so it's really really super closed." "What?" "Exactly." |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Darkroland wrote: While that does seem like a more modern implementation, there's definitely a resource somewhere notating the "current state" of the application. It may be minimal though. However, yet again, another administrative nightmare. "Yes, I closed the app and re-opened, and the issue is still happening!" "Um, you closed it, but now I need you to bring up your existing apps list, and then drag it to the bottom, so it's really really super closed." "What?" "Exactly." This. I mean, this is essentially a regression to the "multitasking" that Win 3.1 did, where it would save the state of a program and stop it from changing while it was in the background. Which.. okay, I guess. But making this the behavior when you "close" the program? That's a terrible idea. Think of how many programs have slow memory leaks. Now, you can't tell your user to close it at the end of the day and reopen it the next day, because that leaked memory is still claimed. |
Author: | Lenas [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Hopefully it'll result in developers doing their due diligence and not creating memory leaks in the first place. Right? Guys? |
Author: | Taskiss [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Closing the window != exiting the application is the way things are in the Mac world, so I'm used to that and it actually makes more sense to me, since closing the window isn't explicitly exiting the app... quit = quit, close = close, and close != quit and all that. If there's a problem with an app, I've never asked the folks I'm trying to help to close the app and re-open it... it's better to ask them to reboot, since that settles any question of application state. And being Windows, that's the first thing I ask folks to do, anyway. |
Author: | Darkroland [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Taskiss wrote: Closing the window != exiting the application is the way things are in the Mac world, so I'm used to that and it actually makes more sense to me, since closing the window isn't explicitly exiting the app... quit = quit, close = close, and close != quit and all that. If there's a problem with an app, I've never asked the folks I'm trying to help to close the app and re-open it... it's better to ask them to reboot, since that settles any question of application state. And being Windows, that's the first thing I ask folks to do, anyway. Would be nice, but I have several teams that are high availability, rebooting isn't an option unless absolutely critical. So solving stuff on the fly is much more useful. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Start "bar" is persistent and still useless (derp the apps I pinned to the start bar now show on the page full of apps I pinned to the metro ui herp...). Start MENU remains conspicuously absent. The rest of the update is pretty meh. Nice not to have dig down to find power/restart I suppose. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Correction: The Start bar now launches apps in desktop mode which means I can launch a functioning version of IE quicker now so it has that going for it. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Post-update everything runs ridiculously slow. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Hopwin wrote: Start MENU remains conspicuously absent. It's been rebuilt and is coming back in the next update. On the topic of "things Microsoft is getting right lately" comes Windows Phone 8.1, which honestly should be called Windows Phone 9 but I can understand the branding decision. Cortana personal assistant, awesome. Swype keyboard, awesome. Notification center and quick toggles, very nice. UI customization with more tile options and backgrounds, finally. I was getting to the point of thinking about a switch, but this is going to keep me around for a while. |
Author: | Midgen [ Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I notice you didn't mention application availability. My last windows phone (HTC WP8) left me wanting in terms of applications to replace the things I did on android. I ended up using it as a trade-up for an HTC One, which I dearly love. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Well, it is still behind Android and iOS in that regard and there's no way to spin it otherwise. However I am hoping more apps become available now that Windows, Windows Phone and Xbox will support universal applications. I think MS finally has a mobile OS with enough technical chops to attract consumers and developers alike. They are also trying to blur the lines between what you're using - I just noticed that my phone synced its accent color onto my desktop (can be disabled) It feels like the most significant update the operating system has ever had, and I've been using it since it launched in 2010. Here's an in-depth review: http://www.wpcentral.com/windows-phone-81-review |
Author: | Shelgeyr [ Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Midgen wrote: I notice you didn't mention application availability. The problem is self-perpetuating and attitude-based, and won't change until developers decide to change. You can't exactly blame the OS for that.Developers aren't writing apps for the platform because they perceive it to be an unpopular one because people aren't adopting the platform because developers aren't writing apps ... Of course, 'shortage of apps' is subjective. There's no shortage if they've got what you want, but it doesn't matter how many apps are available if the one you need is missing. So far, I've only really felt a sense of something missing when everyone was playing Words With Friends and I couldn't find it in the Store. |
Author: | Midgen [ Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Back to Windows 8(.1)... does anyone know of a quick/easy way to export a list of all of your installed applications/programs? |
Author: | Midgen [ Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:17 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I had to rebuild my gaming rig tonight because of a failing SSD, so I installed directly from a Win 8.1 Update 1 on USB. I have to say they've made a lot of dramatic improvements. The Windows button in place of the Start button is going to take some getting used, to, but with the right-click functionality I think I can manage. |
Author: | Darkroland [ Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Midgen wrote: I had to rebuild my gaming rig tonight because of a failing SSD, so I installed directly from a Win 8.1 Update 1 on USB. I have to say they've made a lot of dramatic improvements. The Windows button in place of the Start button is going to take some getting used, to, but with the right-click functionality I think I can manage. Don't get too used to it, the actual rebuilt start menu will be in an update soon. |
Author: | Numbuk [ Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
I'll wait until the next version of Windows before purchasing it for my home (I use it on my work laptop). That seems to be the trend with Windows OS and which one is the superior version. Windows 95? 98 was better. 2000? XP was better. Vista? 7 was better. 8? .... probably next will be better. It's not terrible, I just dislike having functionality hidden from me and buried deep. Although, it forcing itself into a reboot because I kept telling it "Not now, damn it!" when it wanted to restart to apply updates... and doing so in the middle of a video conference which I was sharing my screen... kinda pissed me off. No, it really pissed me off. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
95 was better than 98. Always buys odd numbered Windows versions. |
Author: | TheRiov [ Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Numbuk wrote: I'll wait until the next version of Windows before purchasing it for my home (I use it on my work laptop). That seems to be the trend with Windows OS and which one is the superior version. Windows 95? 98 was better. 2000? XP was better. Vista? 7 was better. 8? .... probably next will be better. It's not terrible, I just dislike having functionality hidden from me and buried deep. Although, it forcing itself into a reboot because I kept telling it "Not now, damn it!" when it wanted to restart to apply updates... and doing so in the middle of a video conference which I was sharing my screen... kinda pissed me off. No, it really pissed me off. Meh you missed a couple of generations in there. Off the top of my head: It really wasn't until XP that the architectures merged significantly. There was some cross-marketing between business/standard but until XP, they really were not even the same animal. Even now there are slight modifications between Pro & Home editions but mostly its differences in included features, not architecture. (support for domains, etc) Marketed to Business: NT -> NT 3->NT 3.5->NT4->2000->XP->Vista->7->9 Marketed to Home users: 3.0->3.1->95->98->98SE->ME->XP->Vista->7->8 |
Author: | Talya [ Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows 8.1 Update |
Lenas wrote: Well, it is still behind Android and iOS in that regard and there's no way to spin it otherwise. However I am hoping more apps become available now that Windows, Windows Phone and Xbox will support universal applications. I think MS finally has a mobile OS with enough technical chops to attract consumers and developers alike. They are also trying to blur the lines between what you're using - I just noticed that my phone synced its accent color onto my desktop (can be disabled) It feels like the most significant update the operating system has ever had, and I've been using it since it launched in 2010. Here's an in-depth review: http://www.wpcentral.com/windows-phone-81-review I have a $200 Dell Venue 8 tablet. I love this thing... and far more apps available than android or iOS. Thing is, win8.1 pro is more than capable of running on tablet hardware. Having all windows apps ever made instead of just RT crap means windows wins the app availability war. Honestly, there's no reason at this point that someone couldn't make a windows 8.1 pro phone. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |