The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

Ripping CDs?
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8595
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Wed May 16, 2012 8:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Ripping CDs?

Okay, so I've got a new phone coming in, and will probably be taking the opportunity of it not having a microSD slot to freshen up my CD rips which, I think I've mentioned before, are sprinkled with maddening glitches on a few tracks.

I also haven't bothered installing iTunes on my new (well, since the last time I did my own rips) computer, so it's not just "handy" as a default option.

I prefer to rip at a 160-192 (uh.. I can never remember for sure... kilo-?)bitrate

Does anybody have any recommendations for a good freeware program that'll rip CDs to mp3 quickly and cleanly? Bonus points for auto-populating track & album metadata.

Author:  Shelgeyr [ Wed May 16, 2012 9:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

I use Windows Media Player.

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Wed May 16, 2012 11:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

Okay, wow. Problem solved beyond my wildest expectations. It's not speedy (it's ripping at ~5x right now), but it's good at catching and correcting errors. And that means it's faster than proofing each track by ear.

Author:  Stathol [ Wed May 16, 2012 11:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ripping CDs?

This is on Windows, I assume?

Probably nothing will ever beat EAC + LAME.

EAC is both very sophisticated and easy to use. It is especially good for trying to rip from problem discs/tracks. It can query online databases to fetch all of the album information. And I do mean all. This can (optionally) include cover art and lyrics. It stuffs the lryics into an Lyrics3v2 tag, which I had no idea even existed until now. I'm not sure if there's even any players that use this information (VLC doesn't seem to, FWIW), but its neat nonetheless.

A note on EAC's default encoding options for LAME:

Since EAC defaults to using "--vbr-new", the "Bit rate" dropdown actually has no effect. If you have "High Quality" selected, it will encode with the "-V 2" quality setting (~190 kbps VBR). If you have "Low Quality" selected, it will encode with "-V 5" (~150 kbps VBR). It's pretty well accepted that anything beyond -V 2 is like buying $300 gold plated audio cables. And it's pretty debatable whether -V 2 really offers any statistically significant benefit over -V 3. Even at -V 5, most people will have a hard time distinguishing between MP3 and uncompressed original. At the same time, I don't doubt that you can get a slight "castanets" effect (pre-echo on strong impulses like high-hat hits) at -V 5 that won't be audible at -V 3 or better.

Personally, the only thing I might change is bumping the high quality setting down to -V 3. It would be somewhat closer to your target bitrate range, since -V 2 would lay on the upper edge thereof. In other words, change the "Additional command-line options" to:
Code:
%islow%-V 5%islow%%ishigh%-V 3%ishigh% --vbr-new %source% %dest%

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Thu May 17, 2012 7:35 am ]
Post subject: 

Yeah, EAC is what was recommended to me. It's already fixed one of the songs I knew I had a glitch on from ripping with iTunes.

Thanks for the heads-up on the command line options overriding the bitrate dropdown. I only got ripped the one test CD last night, so not much backtrack work to keep consistency.

Author:  Darkroland [ Thu May 17, 2012 8:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ripping CDs?

I also vote for EAC and LAME, I have ripped hundreds (if not thousands) of CD's (converted my entire collection to lossless a few years ago) and it's always caught any disc read errors.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/