Heh, yeah, I was assuming sarcasm.
Heh, I dunno if it was premeditated. I've been listening to sports radio while in the car today (something I usually don't do), and spent a lot of time on sports boards this morning. Seems that Quentin thinks they have a history, while Greinke really just looks at him as another batter. He may have hit him on purpose once, four or five years ago. Hardly a "history," if you ask me.
I don't think it was premeditated so much as Quentin taking it personally after getting hit by a pitch by Belisario on Tuesday. He probably thinks that the Dodgers in general are doing it on purpose, and took it out on Greinke.
If you're interested, I could put up some links on comparing Matt Kemp (said by a SI writer to also be one who leans in) with Quentin. Someone analyzed their stances and noted why Kemp can get out of the way of those pitches, while Quentin can't. He does dive in toward the plate a bit.
Or, I can link you to the observation that much of Quentin's value - about a third of his performance, really - is due to getting hit by a pitch so much. Ah, found a quote, at least:
Some sports writer wrote:
Consider the following: if you remove the plate appearances in which he got hit by a pitch from Quentin’s career and pretend that they never happened, he would lose more than 3.0 WAR out of 8.6 WAR he has generated over more than seven years in the majors. About 35 percent of the value Quentin has created for his employers has come by way of a bruise.
WAR = Wins Above Replacement, another super-geeky baseball stat. Point still stands.
He's a douche.