The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

Time Saving with Parking
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=10405
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Numbuk [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Time Saving with Parking

I don't get it. I see this all the time.

Some person decides to park their car into a stall not by pulling forward into it, but by backing up into it. Now, I could completely understand this logic if 1. They can successfully back into the stall with minimal effort and time or 2. They are doing this at their home, to save (two extra seconds worth of) time in the morning on their way to work.

But no. I see it often at stores. Grocery shopping. Anywhere there are cars and parking stalls for them. And 9 times out of 10, it takes them easily a good 30 seconds to 1 minute to back up their vehicle (9 times out of 10 it is a truck or SUV, and 9 times out of 10 it is a male driver).

What is the point?! Are you deluding yourself into thinking you are saving time? Because I have news for you. While you may have shaved two whole, whopping seconds off of your departure, you are still 60 seconds closer to your eventual death that you could have saved just by parking like everyone else.

Maybe they are afraid that today will be the day that during the 10 minutes they are shopping at Best Buy, the zombie apocalypse will hit and it will just so happen it will also be the exact time their reverse gear stops working. That's the only thing I can come up with.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

In some cases its easier to get in and out of a space by backing in, because you can see where the corners of the vehicle are with the mirrors. When looking over your right front, it's hard to tell how far you are from things. that's a reason for a lot of cockeyed parking jobs; people being unsure how far they are from adjacent vehicles.

Author:  Müs [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

Because people are stupid and don't know how big their cars are.

Author:  Numbuk [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Diamondeye wrote:
In some cases its easier to get in and out of a space by backing in, because you can see where the corners of the vehicle are with the mirrors. When looking over your right front, it's hard to tell how far you are from things. that's a reason for a lot of cockeyed parking jobs; people being unsure how far they are from adjacent vehicles.


I'd accept that as a minimally acceptable excuse, but I've seen this scenario many times with sedans, or vehicles even smaller. Even ones without rear cameras.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

Even without rear cameras, it holds. Some people just have a hard time judging distance.

Author:  NephyrS [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

Also, tight spots.

Due to one set of turning and one set of stationary wheels, you're more maneuverable backing in than pulling in front first. I almost exclusively park by backing in for tight spaces.

It's the same reason you back into a parallel parking spot rather than pull into it.

Author:  Lenas [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Time Saving with Parking

Just saw this thread and on my way to lunch I witnessed someone not understanding their SUV turn radius, resulting in her driving half the car over our grass leaving the parking lot.

Moral of this thread: bad drivers gonna be bad.

Author:  Mookhow [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Time Saving with Parking

At my old job, we had a driving safety course we had to take. One of the things they suggested was backing into a parking spot or pulling through. This is because it's easy to get into an accident while backing out of a parking spot. Similarly, there's a company nearby (Schlumberger) where they mandate that all employees back into the parking spots at work, for the same reason. You can see mention of this policy here.

Author:  Midgen [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

I prefer backing in. I'm just usually too lazy to bother...

I usually regret this when it's time to leave.

Author:  Taskiss [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Time Saving with Parking

The front fascia is lower on most of my cars than the rear diffuser and it would crunch on impact with a concrete parking bumper.

Author:  Rorinthas [ Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Mookhow wrote:
At my old job, we had a driving safety course we had to take. One of the things they suggested was backing into a parking spot or pulling through. This is because it's easy to get into an accident while backing out of a parking spot. Similarly, there's a company nearby (Schlumberger) where they mandate that all employees back into the parking spots at work, for the same reason. You can see mention of this policy here.


This. That way you can see the direction you are going better on your way out, when you are most likely to encounter other moving objects be they vehicle or pedestrian. Valet's are trained to back into spaces for this reason, and also you save time on the retrieval, when the customer is waiting.
Midgen wrote:
I'm just usually too lazy to bother...


but also this since I've been out of the profession for a few years now.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:53 am ]
Post subject: 

In the Army, backing in is known as "combat parking" and when in the field, is always done when you pull into a parking area at a TOC or something, so you can pull out rapidly.

Law enforcement vehicles should do the same thing, but a lot don't.

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:21 am ]
Post subject: 

I can see the utility of backing in if everybody did it. But when 2/3s of the vehicles in the lot are SUVs and vans, any improved visibility is pretty well moot.

Author:  Stathol [ Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:15 am ]
Post subject: 

Look at it this way: if they back into their space, they're backing into an empty parking space next to (probably) uninhabited vehicles. If they back out of their space, they're backing into an active parking lot with moving vehicles, pedestrians, inattentive children, etc.

They're clearly shitty at backing vehicles, so which would you rather have them do?

Author:  Talya [ Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:20 am ]
Post subject: 

I will park somewhat further away from my destination if there is a "drive-through" spot available, where I can drive forward through two spots and be ready to drive out on the other side.

I never back into a parking spot. Because **** that effort.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

Kaffis Mark V wrote:
I can see the utility of backing in if everybody did it. But when 2/3s of the vehicles in the lot are SUVs and vans, any improved visibility is pretty well moot.


You're still going to be able to see around those sooner coming out headfirst.

Author:  Gilraen [ Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Time Saving with Parking

Quote:
One of the things they suggested was backing into a parking spot or pulling through. This is because it's easy to get into an accident while backing out of a parking spot.


This is why I back into a spot whenever possible. Because it's much easier to see what's coming at me as I'm pulling out to leave.

Author:  Lenas [ Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Stathol wrote:
They're clearly shitty at backing vehicles, so which would you rather have them do?


That's some nice train of thought. Good point.

Author:  Squirrel Girl [ Sat Sep 21, 2013 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Time Saving with Parking

Mookhow wrote:
Similarly, there's a company nearby (Schlumberger) where they mandate that all employees back into the parking spots at work, for the same reason. You can see mention of this policy here.


This made me laugh, because my ex works for Schlumberger and I remember him pushing this. To be honest, it is safer to exit going forward. You are going to have to back up either coming or going. Why not back up when there are fewer hazards?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/