The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:09 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:51 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/ ... 32fe6.html

Quote:
SAN ANTONIO, Texas -- Somerset Police arrested a 16-year-old girl on charges of online harassment. She was arrested under a new law that took effect September 1.

The new Texas law criminalizes online harassment on social networking sites and through e-mail or text messaging. H.B. 2003 states a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.

Somerset Chief Martin Chavez said the department had enough probable cause to issue a warrant for the young girl's arrest.

"Don't harass people online. The crime is severe, it's a third degree felony. So, even if you're joking sometimes it can really hurt people and now it's against the law," said Chief Chavez.

Details of the incident weren't made available, but police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy.

The 16-year-old girl has a detention hearing Wednesday at 2:30 p.m.

It seems the goal of the new law was to discourage using the name or persona of another person to create a Web page. Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new internet law.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Without detail on what she actually engaged in, it's impossible to really have much of a comment.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Sure it's possible to comment. It's a shitty law, no matter how nobly-intented it is.

Laws which criminalize intent are either terrifyingly subjective and based on the whim of the enforcer, or completely unenforceable. As such, they should not be made.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:26 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Wait, is that a state law in Texas, or a local San Antonio law?

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
It's a state bill.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/billlookup ... ill=HB2003

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:10 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
It's a bill that most states have put on their books after a 13 year-old girl in Missouri killed herself. It is a shitty law, because the argument that internet harassment drove her to suicide assumes that she wasn't likely to kill herself completely of her own accord - an assumption that, to be quite blunt, was rather shaky.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
I can see this going to the supreme court on first amendment basis.

And the SC will be all LOL WTF? Umad? l2troll. Ur case? TL;DR.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:57 am
Posts: 849
This law needs its jurisdiction expanded to, oh, NATO, so I can report people that harass me online via /emote spam when they kill my partner in WoW arena. :(


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:27 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Aizle wrote:
Without detail on what she actually engaged in, it's impossible to really have much of a comment.


Actually it's very easy to comment.

Did she break any laws in regards to falsifying her identity or anything of that nature? Probably not. Predicated on this assumption, it's a stupid law. Why should you try to legislate "niceness". I'm all for it though, as Texas can show what a great example of failure really is.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group