The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:34 am 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
The short version is:

Half a century after many Virginia public schools shut their doors rather than accept black students, the state is offering college scholarships to compensate those whose education suffered in the era of "massive resistance" to desegregation. Among the recipients: white students.

Spoiler:
Half a century after many Virginia public schools shut their doors rather than accept black students, the state is offering college scholarships to compensate those whose education suffered in the era of "massive resistance" to desegregation. Among the recipients: white students.

Since 2004, about 70 people have won the scholarships, including a handful of white Virginians whose schooling was disrupted in the late 1950s and early 1960s. A precise count of white scholarship recipients was unavailable, but the total is thought to be fewer than 10. Officials who oversee the state program say they want to spread the word to more white students who might be eligible.

"Both black and white students lost an opportunity because of the state's decision, and both deserve this aid," said Brenda Edwards, who administers the Brown v. Board of Education Scholarships for the Virginia Division of Legislative Services. "White people hear Brown v. Board, and they think they're not eligible. We're trying to change that perception. . . . We want more people to get the education they missed out on years ago."

Phyllis Archer, 57, a scholarship recipient who is black, said the push to include white students in the program is misguided. "This was the state's chance to apologize for wrongdoing, not to award people who have never known racism," Archer said.
June Jeffrey, 69, is also a scholarship recipient. She is a real estate agent who is studying English at Lord Fairfax Community College in Warrenton and is white.
In 1958, four years after the landmark Supreme Court ruling that found school segregation unconstitutional, Jeffrey's high school in Warren County closed its doors.
While black students left the county or attended loosely organized classes in living rooms and church basements, Jeffrey's school reestablished itself as the Warren County Education Foundation School, which enrolled only white students. It held classes in buildings across town, keeping the same teachers and paying them partly with public funds.

When a federal court ruled in February 1959 that Warren County schools must integrate, Jeffrey and most of her classmates remained at the all-white foundation school. But she said they lost access to facilities, counseling and the trappings of a traditional high school experience.

"We missed having a real senior year," Jeffrey recalled. "We just wanted to finish up with our friends."

Jeffrey detailed those experiences when she applied for the scholarship years later.
"I was just hoping that they wouldn't ask me for a photo," she said. She was never sure whether white students qualified.

Not only do they qualify, she later learned, but officials are traveling the state to inform residents - including white residents - of their eligibility. Former students whose public schools in Arlington County, Charlottesville, Norfolk, Prince Edward County or Warren County closed in the late '50s and early '60s are eligible.

The effort to recruit white applicants has reopened wounds from Virginia's painful racial history.

Archer, who is working toward a degree in nonprofit management from the University of Richmond, said she wonders whether some scholarship recipients are from families that defended segregation. "That's really unacceptable," she said.

From kindergarten to second grade, Archer bounced between "black schools" in Prince Edward County churches, run by volunteer instructors. She remembers, at 6 years old, asking through tears about the reason for the disruption.
"Some people just don't like us," her mother said.

To Archer and others, the scholarship program represents more than compensation for schooling disruptions: It also is an acknowledgment that segregation was immoral. Offering the award to white students, Archer said, dilutes that message.

For years, Virginia has wrestled over how to recognize its troubled racial history.
Tensions surfaced last year when Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) omitted any mention of slavery when he proclaimed April "Confederate History Month." He later apologized.
From 1984 to 2001, the state declined to set aside a holiday dedicated only to the memory of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Instead, Virginia had a Lee-Jackson-King Day, commemorating the slain civil rights leader alongside two Confederate generals, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. The state now has a separate holiday in January for Lee and Jackson.

In 2003, the General Assembly debated whether to "express regret" or "apologize" for the massive resistance policy in a public resolution.

"The feeling was, 'We didn't do this, so why should we apologize?' " said Viola Baskerville, then a delegate from Richmond. The subsequent declaration of regret stated that both black and white Virginians "were affected as well by the deep, contentious division created by the denial of public education to the African-American community."

When the scholarship was created, state officials faced thorny questions over who deserved compensation and what form it should take.
Similar questions have arisen elsewhere.

In 2001, a task force in Harrison, Ark., considered providing scholarships to black students a century after African American residents had been driven out of town by a white mob. In 2004, a federal court weighed whether Oklahomans should receive compensation for a 1921 Tulsa race riot. In 2006, the Brown University community in Rhode Island debated whether the school should make financial amends for its use of slave labor.

None of those debates resulted in concrete reparations. When Virginia lawmakers considered the Brown v. Board scholarship, they were on new ground. Experts say that no other state has such a scholarship.

"This wasn't easy," said Baskerville, who sponsored the scholarship legislation. "And it would have been much harder politically if it was only tailored to black students."
No one disputes that some white students faced educational challenges during the resistance era. Although the state created a voucher program to help white children attend private schools, tuition was not always wholly subsidized, leaving poor whites with few options. But historians note that massive resistance hurt black students most.
"To say that white students are as entitled to compensation, that speaks to the politics of the state, not the call for justice," said Clarence E. Walker, a professor at the University of California-Davis who has studied reparations.

Virginia's scholarship winners, mostly in their mid-60s, get anywhere from $300 to $10,000 a year for courses of their choosing, ranging from vocational training to doctorate-level classes. The program began with a $1 million donation from the billionaire media investor John Kluge and a matching amount from the state.

Ken Woodley, editor of the Farmville Herald in Prince Edward, helped come up with the idea for the scholarship. It was meant to be a modest step to right a racial wrong, he said "When I came up with the idea, I was thinking of African Americans," he said. "I've had a hard time thinking of white students being hurt."

http://www.washingtonpost.com
WP20110620brownvboard20
Document WP00000020110620e76k0002a


Unless I'm missing some part of the extended effect of history, I personally see no problem with white students receiving this scholarship. I also don't see the point of awarding scholarships to those over the retirement age...
So I thought I'd toss this to you guys...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:24 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
There's really not a whole lot of point in it as a practical matter, although not everyone over retirement age can retire, so this might be helpful in some cases.

As to the issue of whites getting access to it, the problem is right here:

Quote:
"This was the state's chance to apologize for wrongdoing, not to award people who have never known racism,"


"Racism" is not really the issue, and never has been. In the 1950s and 60s and into the 1970s, racism had real, tangible, measurable effects like segregation. As progress has been made over the intervening years since Brown v. Board of Education, those effects have passed, so that now it is very hard indeed to find any directly negative consequence anyone suffers as a direct effect of racism.

The problem is that social attitudes among blacks have, largely, not changed when it comes to perceiving racism. There are 2 main reasons for this:

1) Lingering economic disadvantage. Blacks, as a whole, are economically worse off than whites as a whole. This is frequently cited as evidence of continued "racism". The problem, however, is that the farther we get from the era when real, tangible barriers to black success existed the less we can really blame it on racism because more and more factors intervene. For example, a common complaint is that schools in poor black areas have little money, and that this is "racism". This argument, however, ignores that A) the school being underfunded is not an excuse not to attend it; one can still get pretty well educated if one applies onesself and B) fails to account for poor areas that are not predominantly black. Indeed, there is often a catch-22 where a black person who achieves is called a "sell-out" or are told they are "trying to be white", which points to an unrealistic view amongst many blacks that if only there were no "racism" their problems would magically go away without effort on their part.

2) The use of "racism" as an excuse not to confront real issues, or to adapt thinking about racial issues to changing times. This problem is one that is primarily driven by Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and their ilk. They are old men who are unable to adjust their thinking from the 1960s, and so every new issue that arises is met with new cries of "racism!"

Essentially, "racism" has morphed itself into a problem that cannot ever be solved because it constantly redefines itself. It is, in scientific terms, an undisprovable hypothesis, and we all know what the worth of an undisprovable hypothesis is. New social initiatives such as affirmative action are not measured in terms of their fairness, but in terms of whether they combat "racism", and that racism will never go away (and therefore neither will the program) because any suggestion it is not there or the program is not necessary is termed "racist". Monty used to like to talk about "dog whistle" politics and "Stealth racism" both of which are clever ways of saying "I can call something racist, and it is so unless it is disproven to my satisfaction", satisfaction which would never be attained no matter how overwhelming the evidence. Basically, those crying racism shift the burden of proof, laying the claim on whatever they please and then challenging the other side to dispute it and also laying the additional claim of racism on any counter argument.

Thus, the claim I quoted shows the false thinking: The problem isn't "racism" the problem is what harm people suffered. This black woman, however, doesn't get that. She thinks it is about giving her a reward for how other people thought, not remedying the damage to her education, and thus she does not understand that others who suffered damage should be entitled to the same treatment regardless of how others thought about them.

Of course, there's also the issue of whether such a program should exist at all, and frankly I find it a bit silly and misguided, but in terms of the racial issues, there it is.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 267 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group