The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Talya wrote:
the people are the ones that suffer for it. This inflation is just another form of taxation.

Depends. Inflation is generally a loss for savers and lenders but a gain for debtors (assuming their loans aren't pegged to inflation). Given how deeply in debt most American households are, I think slightly higher inflation would probably result in a net transfer of wealth from banks and credit card companies to regular people.

I don't know of any credit cards that aren't tied to inflation.

Hm, really? I've never seen one that was. Certainly most cards are variable rate, but interest rates and inflation tend to be inversely related, so there's no de facto peg there either.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
The problem being that the buying power of their income is being reduced right along with the buying power of their debt, and their incomes are not necessarily increasing at the same rate as inflation.

True, there are a number of variables involved, but I think the rule of thumb is still that higher inflation is generally a positive for debtors and a negative for creditors.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:55 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
RangerDave wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
The problem being that the buying power of their income is being reduced right along with the buying power of their debt, and their incomes are not necessarily increasing at the same rate as inflation.

True, there are a number of variables involved, but I think the rule of thumb is still that higher inflation is generally a positive for debtors and a negative for creditors.


In general this is true, and was an argument against the Gold Standard back when William Jennings Bryan was arguing for more inflation so that farmers could pay off their debts more easily. That doesn't really translate too well to it being a positive in the average household though, especially when that debt is on credit cards.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
Talya wrote:
the people are the ones that suffer for it. This inflation is just another form of taxation.

Depends. Inflation is generally a loss for savers and lenders but a gain for debtors (assuming their loans aren't pegged to inflation). Given how deeply in debt most American households are, I think slightly higher inflation would probably result in a net transfer of wealth from banks and credit card companies to regular people.

I don't know of any credit cards that aren't tied to inflation.

Hm, really? I've never seen one that was. Certainly most cards are variable rate, but interest rates and inflation tend to be inversely related, so there's no de facto peg there either.


Most are variable, tied to Prime, or whatever. This is typically raised when inflation rises. So, your scenario only results in wealth redistribution if the interest rates remain stagnant, while inflation rises. They don't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:03 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Most are variable, tied to Prime, or whatever. This is typically raised when inflation rises. So, your scenario only results in wealth redistribution if the interest rates remain stagnant, while inflation rises. They don't.


You have cause and effect backwards, I think. You certainly have the relationship between inflation and interest rates backwards, but that's understandable. What you are saying could have been perceived to be true in the past, because governments used to raise interest rates in an effort to curb inflation, because raising rates has an inverse effect on inflation, but governments have can no longer afford to raise interest rates without disastrous effects on their deficit/debt issues.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Talya wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Most are variable, tied to Prime, or whatever. This is typically raised when inflation rises. So, your scenario only results in wealth redistribution if the interest rates remain stagnant, while inflation rises. They don't.


You have cause and effect backwards, I think. You certainly have the relationship between inflation and interest rates backwards, but that's understandable. What you are saying could have been perceived to be true in the past, because governments used to raise interest rates in an effort to curb inflation, because raising rates has an inverse effect on inflation, but governments have can no longer afford to raise interest rates without disastrous effects on their deficit/debt issues.


Low interest rates drives inflation. Yes, governments raise interest rates to curb inflation. As inflation rises, generally, interest rates follow.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:32 pm 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Why? Inflation makes it harder for people to save. The people with a lot of money don't care, they get the benefit of the easing, but everyone else lose value on their savings. It's just one more thing that helps continue the growing difficulties for most Americans.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:28 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
@Wwen: When people have less money, they buy less (lower demand), which in turn puts downward pressure on prices. Higher interest rates mean people have less available money, so inflation is curbed.

Except interest rates have remained incredibly low now for almost 20 years. There have been no significant changes to interest rates in the last decade. The Bank of Canada prime lending rate has varied between 0.5% and 4.5% in that time, and is currently sitting at 1.25%. Between 1979 and 1991, it varied between 9% and 19%, but it rapidly dropped off after 1991 and never ever really rose again, despite real inflation right now being worse than it has been in 30 years.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:50 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Taly:

Everything you've said has been compartmentalized. None of this exists in a vacuum.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group