Talya wrote:
Timmit wrote:
My high school had in-school suspension. All your teachers would assign you a crapload of really boring coursework on whatever they were covering that day/week/however long you were suspended and you'd sit in a tiny grey room all by yourself and be have to do those awful assignments all day.
That's a good idea, because a lot of the types of kids who would get suspended, considered suspensions to be a reward...
I suppose if you hated school and your goal was to get a few days off and your parents didn't really care enough to stay at home with you make you do chores/make your suspension a punishment rather than a reward, then yeah, suspension would be fun.
But isn't that the bottom line anyway? Its the parents and not the schools.
If the parents are actively involved in their children's lives, talk to them on a regular basis, care about how they are doing in school, etc then they would know when their kids were getting in trouble and whether it was warranted or not.
Suspension in and of itself should not be the punishment. It should, rather, be considered as the school providing the opportunity for the parents to provide discipline. Therefore, if suspension does not work, it falls on the parents. It is not the school's responsibility to raise your kids, people.