Talya wrote:
Not at all. People make their own purpose. Since nothing metaphysical can be shown to exist, any purpose based on metaphysical human constructs (Be it "god" or "inherent rights") might as well be based on nothing at all, for all its usefulness. I have no beliefs, I just have what matters to me. These aren't beliefs, anymore than my predisposition to preferring rum or vodka-based cocktails over a shot of neat whiskey is a belief. There's nothing existential about them. It's just what I like. If you get off on dying for some nebulous concept of Freedom, then whatever floats your boat. There is no such thing as altruism anyway, we ultimately do everything for selfish reasons. I just don't see how such a life or sacrifice ends up benefiting the person who does it, unless they truly believe that in so doing they are making the world a better place for those they care about afterward. Even then, thats a lot of faith to place in something so unproven--who knows, the things they fight for may make life miserable for those they care about. I suppose they'll never know, and faith is a blind thing, if they've deluded themselves with belief, they can die happy. Whatever works for them.
For the record:
Fighting for love is practical, falls under the enjoying life thing.
Fighting for peace is an oxymoron.
Fighting for Freedom, well I guess I covered that. To the extent the lack of freedom would infringe upon my ability to enjoy my life, I suppose I get it.
Nothing you've just posted demonstrates that your own happiness and preferences are any more substantial than constructed abstractions humans have come up with, nor that what that the hedonist's approach is any less steeped in arbitrary belief than any other idealism.
Don't try to pass it off as "it's just what I like." "I have no beliefs, I just have what matters to me." That is completely delusional.
Additionally, if no one is truly alturistic and is indeed selfish, that means when they choose to live their life for such abstract constructs as Freedom, they are doing it because they "prefer" it, to use the word in your context. That means they're not doing anything different than you. Any noble action they take is for the same reason you act in a way you "prefer".
Ultimately, the entirety of what you are saying boils to down living for "happiness", and the reason you choose not to phrase it so, is because that makes this so-called utilitarian approach predicated on something just as nebulous as "freedom, love, peace" etc.