Hooray -- more criminalization of reverse engineering. Just what this world needs.
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
In other news: don't provide links to tools or participate in piracy on your domain, and you're safe from this law, barring vendettas from the bench (which can be appealed, in theory).
1)
http://www.ollydbg.de/. Oh ****, looks like the Glade now links to "hacking tools".
Whoops, I
did it
again.
My bad.
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Does it impinge free speech? Yes. But in a society where we have no qualms about outlawing and criminalizing hate speech [...]
This really is the worst possible lesson we could learn from this arrangement.
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
I see no reason to suddenly get up in arms over outlawing and criminalizing speech that is endorsing, encouraging, and facilitating (one could say "conspiring to sponsor") criminal activity. An example of which, last time I checked, copyright infringement is.
If you've read through the full text of the DMCA (and all other related acts), and fully understand what it
actually criminalizes as opposed to what people
suppose it criminalizes, I don't think you'd be so swift to make a blanket condemnation of every "infringing" act.
Incidents like the Sony rootkit and the StarForce **** are prime examples of why reverse engineering is essential to protecting consumer rights, EULAs, DMCA, copyright, and patent laws be damned. And that's really just scratching the surface. This is act is going to be used to intimidate and take down sites like
OpenRCE, which aren't even "cracking" sites, but deal with topics and tools that
could be (and are) used in the practice of piracy if one has a mind to do so.
The best part of all is that the whole premise of COICA is hillariously flawed. DNS wankery? Really? This is the best you guys could come up with?
Taskiss wrote:
Blocking DNS is equivalent to refusing to publish a number in the phone book.
Sort of, but it's not that simple. The jurisdictional issues with respect to ICANN and the U.S. federal government are murky at best, and this is further complicated by the fact that many of the root server cluster nodes and owned and operated outside of the U.S. by entirely foreign entities. Even if the U.S. can still exercise this level of authority over ICANN (maybe), they still don't have an authority to **** with other country's property. And any way you turn it, ICANN is a sensitive political issue on the global scale. At the very least, announcing that they're going to start blacklisting domains at the root servers or GTLD servers is igniting a global shitstorm.
Xequecal wrote:
What percentage of Internet-using people do you think actually know you can reach a site by typing in the IP address?
Among the target audience? Better than 99.99%. And in any case, one can beat this system in much better ways that using raw IPs. This whole thing is a complete waste of taxpayer money. Pro tip: the blackhats are smarter than Congress.