Diamondeye wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Marcro-level regulation of society does indeed interfere with my life personally, as I've pointed out.
Except you haven't pointed out any interference, and obviously don't know what interference is.
First, get your story straight. You said "touches" not interfere. Your statement below:
Quote:
The government barely touches the everyday lives of citizens,
This statement is beyond bullshit.
Quote:
No you're not. You're showing that you can nitpick semantics. All of the things you described fall into the category of "barely touching". I didn't say "doesn't touch at all". You even have to go down to "influencing" in order to make your argument work, and pretend it means the same thing as "interfering". That's pathetic.
No, first, they interfere. Dramatically. The problem with your argument is that the "everyday lives" of ordinary citizens are already shaped by what they can and cannot do. How many more would smoke if anti-smoking campaigns did not exist? How many more would do drugs? How many more would build in areas they currently aren't allowed to? How many people would drive faster? How many more would drink and drive? How many parents wouldn't educate their kids, or do it differently, if education laws didn't exist? How many people would continue paying taxes at the rates they are now if they weren't required to?
Ordinary people don't break the law. They instead adjust their behavior to comply with the law.
Now, the things I listed, which were my morning, I labeled as "influence", because, well, that's how I viewed it. It's still a serious factor in my day. Suggesting this is "barely touching" my activities is ludicrous.
Quote:
As for your folks, don't make personal examples. The anecdotal situation of your parents, and whatever "substantial and expensive" are supposed to mean don't mean ****.
Don't be willfully ignorant. You're familiar with permitting requirements enough to know, at least in a limited fashion, what's frequently involved.