OK, so I think we're talking past each other, and for once I'm going to attempt to not be the biggest ******* I can be. It's a lot easier when it's really only non-asshole posters remaining. edit: you guys posted 3 times while I was pontificating so I may be behind now.
- I think it is very important to differentiate between social distancing/masks, lockdowns, and quarantines/stay-at-home orders. These are accelerating levels of restrictiveness that require different justifications.
- social distancing/masks: I think no one is in disagreement that much of the upset over the masks can be laid at the feet of the Surgeon General/Fauci and their staffs flip-flopping and then admitting they had ulterior motives. That said, I also think that indoors, and probably at night outdoors, they are of some benefit, perhaps very large benefit. I also think most of us would agree that a private business owner has a right to require masks in their business.
As to whether the government can demand that of businesses, I do not think the Federal government can. The States, however, might be able to, and that would depend on the State Constitution and laws in question. The government certainly can demand it inside government facilities.
I do not see any Constitutional right impeded by masks. The question is not one of "do you have a right to not wear a mask?", it is "Does the echelon of government in question have the power to require it, and if so, when and where?"
I also find that the "You don't have a right to get people sick" argument is completely disingenuous. That is obviously true, but it applies only if someone is actively trying to get people sick. Lack of a right to get people sick is not a power to restrict people from exercise of their other rights, and disingenuous arguments like this actively harm efforts to get people to wear masks.
- lockdowns: By lockdowns, I mean mandating closing businesses
I agree that the lockdown was half-ass. New Zealand did a complete lockdown, but they are an island, making it very easy
I do not think that the Federal Government necessarily has the authority to order a lockdown. The Federal Government DOES have the authority to order businesses to stay OPEN, under the Defense Production Act, and could in theory open the entire economy by simply deeming everything essential, although that would be transparent because of its obvious absurdidty.
The fundamental problem with the lockdown was that it would have had to have been very complete, very short (5-6 weeks at most), and very painful. Disregarding the problems of getting a country of this size and this composition to do so in the first place, I am not entirely sure that the food supply chain could have stood up to it. It was starting to experience stress as it was. People just don't keep 5-6 weeks worth of supplies in their houses and the problem of keeping "essential businesses" open is that other businesses are essential to keepint he essential ones open. Even COVID tests ran across this; in order to make test kits, you need cotton swabs and other things, you need those businesses to stay open, you need trucks or planes available, they need fuel and maintenance... That said, other countries have solved this problem, but being physically much smaller than ours I am not entirely certain we could duplicate their success.
That said, there are certain activities that are very likely to spread COVID. Bars evidently are one. It seems likely movie theaters, concerts, and sporting events would be too. I find it likely that traditional churches are as well (though it pains me to say it), although some governments were way too eager to target them over other venues with similar likelyhood. I also think having a bunch of people cramming together to protest to be pretty likely to be a danger.
On the other hand, there was very little time to plan for this, or understand it, and when time is at a premium, a "panic" reaction may be the only reaction available because nothing can be devised that's any better. I think that such lockdowns as happened at the time were understandable and probably did slow the spread, but I also think that now that we have done it once, it is over, whether we got it right or not.
As to the effect on the rioting and protesting, I do think that the availability of a lot of people with nothing better to do escalated it, regardless of feelings on the issues at hand.
- Quarantine/Stay-at-home:
This is where I think that things have been of very questionable Constitutionality, and counterproductive to boot.
Exercise, Sunlight, Vitamin D, and being in bright, sunny, windy environments where it is hard for the virus to spread are all obviously positive. Closing of outdoor recreation areas was incredibly stupid; beaches, playgrounds, parks (especially national parks in the middle of nowhere) and the like are beyond idiotic. Obesity is a major risk factor with this disease; people do not need to be confined indoors scarfing down Pringles, and our public health authorities have 100% failed on this particular aspect of stay-at-home
Quarantine is an exercise of the police power, and has long been recognized as such - especially by states and localities. The state has great power to confine people positively known to be ill with contagious diseases.
However, this is a taking of liberty, and what do we require to take liberty?
Probable cause
In order to quarantine a person, probable cause to believe that individual is in fact able to spread contagious disease (such as a positive COVID test) must exist. The populace at large cannot be legally quarantined, and the "but we don't know who has it!" and similar arguments are just not good enough.
So what is the government to do instead?
Well, get people to wear masks.
And despite the numerous missteps there have been on masks, it remains a good idea. I agree with Coro on the righteous indignation, hypocrisy, and general desire to disregard mask advisories. I don't want to wear one. But, the fact remains, it's a good idea, and stores are private businesses withiin their rights to mandate them. People need to worry about wearing their own damn mask. They do not need to be the mask police, and they can exercsie their Constitutional rights just fine with one on. If that won't work, find a KOA in the middle of nowhere and stay there for a while. I just did it for 2 weeks; it was pretty fun. Bighorn Sheep are cool.
_________________ "Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."
|