Vindicarre wrote:
You're still stuck on not giving the students the tools they need to interpret the facts for themselves. It's obvious that there's nothing I can do to change that; I'll stop trying. You'll continue believing that the only way to teach about history is to spoon-feed students a version of events that aligns with the agenda because that is the only thing you know.
I'm not stuck on anything, nor have I ever proposed "not giving students tools". In fact, pretty much nothing in what you say above is accurate. I'm guessing then you just ran out of arguments so you're making stuff up?
Specifically, I actually argued against spoon-feeding events that align with agenda, and opened my discussion with problems associated with bias in these classes and other works.
Your post above is so far out of whack I'm starting to wonder if you read some other post somewhere else and inadvertently replied to mine. I hope that's the case, because otherwise - well, I'll just leave it at that.