Aizle wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
You just know it should be more than it currently is for the "rich" or "wealthy"? Who's "rich" or "wealthy"?
Reread what I said. This was not it.
That's the thing, I read what you wrote multiple times and am still confused. Hence the question marks.
If you were being snarky because you thought I was, I wasn't, I'm just confused by what you mean. If you were being snarky because you didn't want to answer my questions, I'm about to waste a bunch of time...
You start off here:
Aizle wrote:
... the revenue side must also be addressed, because it is currently not equitable and fair.
Clarify with this:
Aizle wrote:
I believe there are far more challenges with the rich not paying their fair share than the Wage Class.
Then you say it's the loopholes that need to be closed because the "wealthy" and the "Wage Class" are "similarly reprehensible" in using them.
Then these two quotes seem to make it your intent that the wealthy should pay more because they get more:
Aizle wrote:
I believe in a progressive tax, as the wealthy reap a significantly larger reward for societies blessings.
Aizle wrote:
In the end, the taxes that we take in have to pay for the services that we expect out of the government.
That's why I asked if those who expect (use) the services should pay for them. Are you saying the revenue side isn't "equitable and fair" because:
The "wealthy" aren't paying their fair share?
Because of the loopholes (which you state everyone uses)?
Because the "wealthy" use more of "society's blessings" (What are "society's blessings"?) and should pay for them?
Or, that the "rich" should pay for the entitlement programs used by the "poor"?
Who's rich/wealthy, who's wage class, and who's using the Governmental services "we" expect?
Finally, who is the "we"? Those who use the services, those who create the services, or those who pay for the services?
_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko