Through all his incarnations, Doctor Who has fought selflessly to ensure the survival of all manner of life forms across the Universe.

But now an international group of academics has branded the heroic Time Lord ‘thunderingly racist’.

The Doctor’s new foes claim that his dismissive attitude towards black companions, his contempt for ‘primitive’ people, and even his passion for cricket are all proof of a reactionary ‘whiteness’ pervading his adventures.

Their concerns are published in a new book, Doctor Who And Race, which says the BBC programme is based in attitudes ‘that continue to subjugate people of colour’.

But fans dismiss such criticisms as ‘groundless’ and ‘ridiculous’.

One of the more bizarre theories is offered by Amit Gupta, an American professor, who argues that Peter Davison’s cricket-loving incarnation of the character in the Eighties was thinly disguised nostalgia for the British Empire. He wrote: ‘[He] portrayed the amateur English cricketer of the late 19th Century when the game was characterised by both racial and class distinctions.

‘Cricket also had a role in maintaining the status of British imperialism through the exercise of soft power as it was successfully inculcated by the colonial elites. Davison’s cricketing Doctor once again saw the BBC using Who to promote a racial and class nostalgia that had already outlived its validity.'

Several of the 23 contributors to the book lament the failure to cast a black or Asian actor as the Doctor. And in earlier series, white actors were cast as other ethnicities. Singled out for criticism is a 1977 storyline, The Talons Of Weng- Chiang, set in Victorian times and featuring the white actor John Bennett as a Chinese villain.

There is also an attack on the ‘second-class’ treatment of black characters such as Martha Jones in more recent episodes. A feminist contributor with the pen name Fire Fly, says the Doctor’s relationship with Martha, who was played by Freema Agyeman, is proof of the ‘white perspective’ of the series.

She singles out a 2007 episode set in Elizabethan London when Martha voices her fears that she might be sold into slavery, only to be told by David Tennant’s Doctor that she should ‘walk about like you own the place. It works for me’.

Fire Fly wonders why the Doctor will depose tyrannical alien regimes but will not challenge human slavery. And she claims the exchange ‘betrays the ignorance of writers about historical racial violence and contemporary white privilege’.

There is further criticism of the introduction and Adolf Hitler as a character last year, which was condemned as ‘comic-book’ and ‘slapstick’, and did nothing to increase understanding of the Holocaust.

The Doctor also dismisses as primitive any civilisation that doesn’t share his belief in scientific progress – which the academic critics say is a very ‘West European’ attitude. In the show’s very first story, William Hartnell’s Doctor compares the disbelief of his new companions when they first enter the Tardis with the Red Indian ‘whose savage mind disbelieved steam trains’.

And the introduction of the ‘savage’ – and scantily-clad – companion Leela in the 1970s is offered as further proof of the Time Lord’s inherent racism since she was treated as being ‘more primitive than us’.

Australian academic Lindy Orthia, who compiled the anthology, concluded: ‘The biggest elephant in the room is the problem privately nursed by many fans of loving a TV show when it is thunderingly racist.’

But fans dismissed her criticisms. Sebastian Clark, editor of Doctor Who Online, said the show ‘embraced rather than divided’. He added: ‘I think the suggestion the show is racist is ridiculous.

Doctor treated Martha Jones no differently from the way he treated any other character.’

And the BBC said: ‘Doctor Who has a strong track record of diverse casting among both regular and guest cast. Freema Agyeman became the first black companion and Noel Clarke starred in a major role for five years [Mickey Smith].

‘Reflecting the diversity of the UK is a duty of the BBC, and casting on Doctor Who is colour-blind. It is always about the best actors for the roles.’

The Doctor’s new foes claim that his dismissive attitude towards black companions,

his contempt for ‘primitive’ people,

and even his passion for cricket are all proof of a reactionary ‘whiteness’ pervading his adventures.

There is further criticism of the introduction and Adolf Hitler as a character last year, which was condemned as ‘comic-book’ and ‘slapstick’, and did nothing to increase understanding of the Holocaust.

A feminist contributor with the pen name Fire Fly, says the Doctor’s relationship with Martha, who was played by Freema Agyeman, is proof of the ‘white perspective’ of the series.

I particularly love this line - So it doesn't increase understanding of the Holocaust, an event that is entirely over, and has been for almost 70 years now, and in a large part due to the total destruction of the regime responsible for it... partly due to the contributions of the same culture these idiots are describing as racist.

These are just folks trying to drum up book sales with good old-fashioned outrage. Nonsense.

Fire Fly wonders why the Doctor will depose tyrannical alien regimes but will not challenge human slavery.

Well, remember, there's been no progress at all since the 1960's in terms of race relations.

There appears to have been some significant regress in some ways, actually. But we wouldn't know that because we're tyrannical nazi crackers.

Regress is unsurprising when improvement in race relations would mean loss of that stick to beat one's opponents with.

And when the dominant group feels they've done enough to right the earlier wrongs before the lingering effects of those wrongs have actually been eliminated.

Regress is unsurprising when improvement in race relations would mean loss of that stick to beat one's opponents with.

The LGBT community as a whole is in denial about the human race as a sexually reproducing species.

Continuing to bring race up and trying to redress injustices from multiple generations ago are only perpetuating racism and continuing the problem.

This might be more relevant if the "dominant" group's feelings weren't simply dismissed out of hand, or if the responsibility to remove "lingering effects" were even theirs in the first place. The job of the dominant group is to change the rules to make the playing field level.

See what I did there?

The LGBTQ community as a whole is in denial about the human race as a sexually reproducing species.