The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10103		 Page 1 of 5
Author:  TheRiov [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:25 am ]
Post subject:  SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... rriage-act

still reading. One down.
Author:  Hopwin [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:34 am ]
Post subject: 
Good deal!
Author:  TheRiov [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:40 am ]
Post subject: 
And Prop 8 falls because of standing issues. One-Two.
Author:  Micheal [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:41 am ]
Post subject: 
Good stuff.
Author:  RangerDave [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:10 am ]
Post subject: 
Can't wait to read these opinions.
Author:  FarSky [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
**** yeah.

Also, Texans told their senate to **** the hell off after they cheated Wendy Davis' filibuster. Double **** yeah.
Author:  Hopwin [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
FarSky wrote:
**** yeah.

Also, Texans told their senate to **** the hell off after they cheated Wendy Davis' filibuster. Double **** yeah.

Interesting tangent so gay marriage = abortions in your mind?
Author:  Aizle [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Hopwin wrote:
FarSky wrote:
**** yeah.

Also, Texans told their senate to **** the hell off after they cheated Wendy Davis' filibuster. Double **** yeah.

Interesting tangent so gay marriage = abortions in your mind?


Not to speak for FarSky, but I suspect it's more preventing religious dogma becoming law.
Author:  Hopwin [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:44 am ]
Post subject: 
So being slightly pro-life (shifting the deadline for abortions from 6 months to 5 months) means you are religious then? Also interesting.
Author:  FarSky [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:50 am ]
Post subject:  SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
More "hey, things I support had a good day in court/legislative review" yesterday, and there wasn't a separate thread for that.
Author:  Nitefox [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?
Author:  FarSky [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Short answer: no. Long answer: nooooooooooo.
Author:  TheRiov [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.
Author:  Lenas [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
FarSky wrote:
Short answer: no. Long answer: nooooooooooo.


+
Author:  Nitefox [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.



I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years.
Author:  Midgen [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Nitefox wrote:
I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years. days


FTFY
Author:  Corolinth [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:40 pm ]
Post subject: 
zomg! Gays are going to oppress Christians by forcing homophobes to perform weddings!

That's the stupidest **** objection to legalizing gay marriage I've ever heard. What makes you think a pair of gays would want to spend their wedding at your church?
Author:  TheRiov [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Nitefox wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.



I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years.

Make mine custard filled with chocolate on top please.
Author:  Nitefox [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.



I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years.

Make mine custard filled with chocolate on top please.



There is a place here called Shipley's. Best donuts around. A dozen cost around 8 bucks. You can send a check.
Author:  Nitefox [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:
Corolinth wrote:
zomg! Gays are going to oppress Christians by forcing homophobes to perform weddings!

That's the stupidest **** objection to legalizing gay marriage I've ever heard. What makes you think a pair of gays would want to spend their wedding at your church?



Are you asking me specifically or just in general?
Author:  Hopwin [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:
Corolinth wrote:
zomg! Gays are going to oppress Christians by forcing homophobes to perform weddings!

That's the stupidest **** objection to legalizing gay marriage I've ever heard. What makes you think a pair of gays would want to spend their wedding at your church?

Should we maybe look at existing precedent? You can't force a Catholic Priest to marry non-catholics (or even catholics living in a state of "sin"). Why would you be able to force them to marry gays now? :derp:
Author:  Hopwin [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Nitefox wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.



I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years.

Shorten the timeframe and I will take your bet. I don't want to wait 10 years to collect my donuts.
Author:  Nitefox [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SCOTUS strikes down DOMA.
Hopwin wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Just to get a head count for future developments...

If a gay couple wants to get married by a church that doesn't support gay marriage, should the church be forced to marry the gay couple or punished somehow for not doing so?

Apart from the rhetoric of the social-right claiming this is the end result, I've yet to see anyone in the social-left (or middle) suggest this is something they would ever want.



I'll bet you a box of donuts that it will be put to the challenge by someone within the next 10 years.

Shorten the timeframe and I will take your bet. I don't want to wait 10 years to collect my donuts.



I'll stick with 10 though I wouldn't be surprised if it's sooner.

See, i figure the odds are already in my favor. We have private business owners being sued for not providing wedding support for gays. You just know there is some extreme gay couple out there wanting to prove a point.

I'm not trying to make a big deal out of it, it's just something I think will happen. I really only wanted my intial question answered.
Author:  shuyung [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
Just to clarify the wager, I believe Nitefox is betting on some representative of the militant idiot arm of the gay community to engage in militant idiocy. Anyone wanting to accept the wager would be betting against. I don't know how many of you have studied much history...
Author:  Corolinth [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
That's because Nitefox is currently feeling lonely engaging in militant idiocy by himself.
Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/