The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

Heh. Pretty much.
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10817
Page 1 of 14

Author:  RangerDave [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Heh. Pretty much.

Not that I expect much disagreement with the sentiment here, but Hellfired for the snark.

Image

Author:  Müs [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Pretty much.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Heh. Pretty much.

It's really easy to prove someone thinks a certain way when you do so by declaring it by fiat in a cartoon and playing to the sentiments of people that already agree.

Author:  Talya [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Heh. Pretty much.

RangerDave wrote:
Not that I expect much disagreement with the sentiment here, but Hellfired for the snark.

Image


That pretty much sums up the fundy right.

Author:  Aizle [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

Proof that there is no power in the universe more annoying that a well intention-ed person of faith.

Author:  shuyung [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well intention-ed people of non-faith are not less annoying.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

That, plus on pretty much any other forum this would be pointless trolling.

Author:  Talya [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

shuyung wrote:
Well intention-ed people of non-faith are not less annoying.


I disagree. A well intentioned person of non-faith brings me coffee. A well intentioned person of faith brings me the **** Watchtower magazine.

Author:  Diamondeye [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Talya wrote:
shuyung wrote:
Well intention-ed people of non-faith are not less annoying.


I disagree. A well intentioned person of non-faith brings me coffee. A well intentioned person of faith brings me the **** Watchtower magazine.


*facepalm*

Author:  Midgen [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

I LOL'd

Author:  shuyung [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Talya wrote:
I disagree. A well intentioned person of non-faith brings me coffee. A well intentioned person of faith brings me the **** Watchtower magazine.

I don't think you can actually deduce the intentions of the person who brings you coffee. It may be because you paid them for the coffee, or maybe they just want to have sex with you.

Author:  Corolinth [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

Knowing Taly, she likely considers wanting to have sex with her a good intention.

Author:  Müs [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Or maybe the coffee is payment for the sex? ;)

Author:  Nitefox [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Heh. Pretty much.

Aizle wrote:
Proof that there is no power in the universe more annoying that a well intention-ed person of faith.


You must not hang out with other liberals.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

Author:  Hopwin [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

So the moral of the thread is that intentioned people suck?

Author:  Müs [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Hopwin wrote:
So the moral of the thread is that intentioned people suck?


FTFY

Author:  Corolinth [ Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Hopwin wrote:
moral


Image

Author:  Rorinthas [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:16 am ]
Post subject: 

Caution: Tolerant Left at Work. Stay classy guys!

Author:  FarSky [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:08 am ]
Post subject: 

Intolerance on the left seems to express itself mainly through incessant individual or group-based *****. Intolerance on the right seems to express itself mainly through actively attempting to create laws enshrining said intolerance.

I'll take the former.

Side note, I debated putting "intolerance" in quotation marks. I'm not sure there's not a false equivocacy in claiming it's intolerant to not tolerant intolerance.

Aw, great. Now I've hit semantic satiation of "tolerance". Spell-check, don't let me down.

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

Diamondeye wrote:
That, plus on pretty much any other forum this would be pointless trolling.


It is trolling. It's over simplifying a complicated issue to poke fun at a group of people. It's not a clever way to highlight a problem from both viewpoints, and it misrepresents the "intentions" of probably a majority of Christians.

While it's true that Christians believe, in general, that they should reach out to help those who are going astray, very very few (from what I have seen) are interested in saving others through discrimination. Instead, they are interested in making sure they are not forced to support behavior they disagree with, and they are interested in shaping their environment they want it to be. The former is understandable, and the latter is exactly what folks on the other side are doing as well.

Anyway, crap like this is trolling and a simpleton's view of a complicated relationship.

Author:  Elmarnieh [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:57 am ]
Post subject: 

Leave the poor girl alone for being ginger.

Author:  Aizle [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

FarSky wrote:
Intolerance on the left seems to express itself mainly through incessant individual or group-based *****. Intolerance on the right seems to express itself mainly through actively attempting to create laws enshrining said intolerance.

I'll take the former.

Side note, I debated putting "intolerance" in quotation marks. I'm not sure there's not a false equivocacy in claiming it's intolerant to not tolerant intolerance.

Aw, great. Now I've hit semantic satiation of "tolerance". Spell-check, don't let me down.


This. Also, I have yet to see a non-believer go door to door and try and enlighten anyone.

Author:  shuyung [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:38 am ]
Post subject: 

Right, non-believers won't go door to door. You seem to think that belief is restricted to religion, though, and I'm not sure how you have come to that conclusion.

Author:  RangerDave [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Arathain Kelvar wrote:
it misrepresents the "intentions" of probably a majority of Christians.

I don't take the comic as purporting to represent a majority of Christians, merely a particular subset - i.e., the NOM-style bigots who really do tend to wrap their deep antipathy to and substantive discrimination against homosexuals with throat-clearing b.s. about Christian love and who act all offended and oppressed when people judge them on that substance rather than the insincere packaging.

Author:  Aizle [ Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

shuyung wrote:
Right, non-believers won't go door to door. You seem to think that belief is restricted to religion, though, and I'm not sure how you have come to that conclusion.


The entire context of this thread is religion. If you actually follow the flow of my comments you will see that we're talking about people of faith vs. non-believers. This is a commonly used term and frankly should be crystal clear and understandable by anyone who isn't trying to be an *** and "win the intarwebs".

And yes, I know this is the glade and Hellfire. Not saying I expected any different, just tired of smart people being retarded because they have a nit to pick.

Page 1 of 14 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/