The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi dude. https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=11837 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Müs [ Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi dude. |
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... -the-table Seriously. What in the actual ****? |
Author: | Rynar [ Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Müs wrote: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/29/512295108/with-national-security-council-shakeup-steve-bannon-gets-a-seat-at-the-table Seriously. What in the actual ****? I have no particular love for Steve Bannon, but you could at least have the decency to stop being a shitlib, and making false charges of anti-Semitism. Jews who have worked for Bannon, who have an incredible distaste for him, frequently go on record saying that for all his other flaws, he's not a racist or anti-Semite. Try to have just a drop of intellectual honesty, won't you? |
Author: | Müs [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:08 am ] |
Post subject: | |
No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. |
Author: | Rynar [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. Right. So double down on wrong and stupid. Good work shitlib. Your prize is MOAR Trump!!! Good work. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Rynar wrote: Müs wrote: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/29/512295108/with-national-security-council-shakeup-steve-bannon-gets-a-seat-at-the-table Seriously. What in the actual ****? I have no particular love for Steve Bannon, but you could at least have the decency to stop being a shitlib, and making false charges of anti-Semitism. Jews who have worked for Bannon, who have an incredible distaste for him, frequently go on record saying that for all his other flaws, he's not a racist or anti-Semite. Try to have just a drop of intellectual honesty, won't you? He's had a religious conversion to the left and he needs to prove that his faith is genuine - to himself, most of all. Nevertheless, I encourage the liberal shitposting. After all, Romney was a Nazi until he was not running for president, too. Calling everyone that says things the left doesn't like Nazis has worked out rather nicely - for the Republicans. The left should keep it up; I'm hoping for an uncontested Senate supermajority in 2018. |
Author: | Rynar [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. No, again, shitlib, he's not an avowed white nationalist. That's just you saying stupid things you need to be true in order to stoke your internal hate fire. I don't remember you being this stupid. When did this happen? |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
I'm hoping that the successes of the administration's policies will be so obvious that they can't be ignored. There's a lot of hand wringing today, but I don't think there would be much argument with the ways and means if true greatness is achieved, and by that I mean that there was a greater peace in the middle east, greater jobs, greater $$$ in the average families bank, greater chickens in every greater pot. stuff like that. People are just tired of things like what are going on today being imposed and not showing results. That's happened a lot over the last 30 years. I'm disgusted with the results of all the politicians since Reagan. *I'd* be ticked if Trump didn't make things great again, so I can't blame the folks on the other side of the isle. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. You can provide a quote, I'm sure, where he made such an "avowal". "Looks sleazy as hell" =/= "racist." "White nationalist" is just the replacement for "Racist" which is essentially the same as "cracker." |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Diamondeye wrote: Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. You can provide a quote, I'm sure, where he made such an "avowal". "Looks sleazy as hell" =/= "racist." "White nationalist" is just the replacement for "Racist" which is essentially the same as "cracker." Trump *is* orange though, so Müs isn't totally wrong |
Author: | Corolinth [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. I understand you are an extremist who thinks everything outside of your narrow and myopic world view is racism. This makes you no different than the nazis you are complaining about every day. The Trumpening happened because of you, not because of white nationalists. If you want to know who is to blame for the orange pony, look in a mirror. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Corolinth wrote: Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. I understand you are an extremist who thinks everything outside of your narrow and myopic world view is racism. This makes you no different than the nazis you are complaining about every day. The Trumpening happened because of you, not because of white nationalists. If you want to know who is to blame for the orange pony, look in a mirror. Or at your avatar. He's got you dead to rights on the "pony" thing, Müs. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Taskiss wrote: I'm hoping that the successes of the administration's policies will be so obvious that they can't be ignored. There's a lot of hand wringing today, but I don't think there would be much argument with the ways and means if true greatness is achieved, and by that I mean that there was a greater peace in the middle east, greater jobs, greater $$$ in the average families bank, greater chickens in every greater pot. stuff like that. People are just tired of things like what are going on today being imposed and not showing results. That's happened a lot over the last 30 years. I'm disgusted with the results of all the politicians since Reagan. *I'd* be ticked if Trump didn't make things great again, so I can't blame the folks on the other side of the isle. Meh, here's the problem. I think if Trump is successful, he'll solve a lot of problems, or set the environment for problems to be solved, but here's the reality. He's a political amateur, he's very rough around the edges. So any successful administration will undoubtedly be lined with more than his share of "holy crap, he did what??" scenarios. And of course, that's what will make the news, and what people will remember. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Arathain Kelvar wrote: Meh, here's the problem. I think if Trump is successful, he'll solve a lot of problems, or set the environment for problems to be solved, but here's the reality. He's a political amateur, he's very rough around the edges. So any successful administration will undoubtedly be lined with more than his share of "holy crap, he did what??" scenarios. And of course, that's what will make the news, and what people will remember. I think you're right, but I don't think you went quite far enough - the media deeply resents Trump, partly because they don't like his policies, and partly because they pulled out all the stops once it became obvious he was a real threat. Trump did not need to appease the media to win, and they resent that deeply - even some of the more conservative outlets will hint at it from time to time. Therefore, almost anything he does will be "holy crap he did what?". Remember the meltdown days after the election over going a few blocks to eat steak without the entire media corps trailing behind. That was treated as a blatant disregard for the role of the media in democracy - getting something to eat. This is a dangerous situation because lets suppose Trump really does do something truly over the top - nothing like what he's done now, which is just called "what happens when someone gets to govern without being scared of negative liberal press." The media has already beaten its own credibility on him to death and is starting in on the corpse. (And those that haven't, such as Sean Hannity aren't any better because they're in the tank for him.) With the exception of a few people that behaved somewhat respectably such as Lester Holt and Chris Wallace, few people are likely to take them seriously, and in the worst cases there are outright bigots being allowed to have access to major media outlets because they're the righ't kind of bigot, such as Charles Blow at NYT. The media needs to start taking its own internal ethics and standards seriously again, and it could start with "no activism on company time." |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Müs wrote: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/29/512295108/with-national-security-council-shakeup-steve-bannon-gets-a-seat-at-the-table Seriously. What in the actual ****? utter nonsense The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the DNI have not, in fact, been downgraded in their NSC participation. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs? Nah. The Breitbart Nazi du |
Arathain Kelvar wrote: And of course, that's what will make the news, and what people will remember. So much of what makes the news isn't news. That's what people should remember, and I think that's what people are starting to realize. |
Author: | Müs [ Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Someone has to be the Monty. I don't have it in me to be the Bery. It gets a little stale here sometimes. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: Someone has to be the Monty. I don't have it in me to be the Bery. It gets a little stale here sometimes. You'll always be my little pony, to me. |
Author: | Wwen [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. I think it's kind of **** gross to people that suffered under Nazi to use the term so loosey goosey. It means nothing if you just call anyone a **** Nazi, you shitbird. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Wwen wrote: Müs wrote: No. He's an avowed white nationalist. In common parlance that makes him a nazi. Also, **** him and the orange pony he rode in on. I think it's kind of **** gross to people that suffered under Nazi to use the term so loosey goosey. It means nothing if you just call anyone a **** Nazi, you shitbird. I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. Since "not giving people exactly what they want at public expense" isn't "making them suffer", you don't have much to worry about. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Diamondeye wrote: Müs wrote: I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. Since "not giving people exactly what they want at public expense" isn't "making them suffer", you don't have much to worry about. "I'll take 'People that are catastrophically missing the point' for $800 Alex". |
Author: | Rynar [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: Diamondeye wrote: Müs wrote: I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. Since "not giving people exactly what they want at public expense" isn't "making them suffer", you don't have much to worry about. "I'll take 'People that are catastrophically missing the point' for $800 Alex". Who is Mus |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: "I'll take 'People that are catastrophically missing the point' for $800 Alex". Your point is just catastrophically wrong. |
Author: | Screeling [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Rynar wrote: Müs wrote: Diamondeye wrote: Müs wrote: I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. Since "not giving people exactly what they want at public expense" isn't "making them suffer", you don't have much to worry about. "I'll take 'People that are catastrophically missing the point' for $800 Alex". Who is Mus |
Author: | Müs [ Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Screeling wrote: Rynar wrote: Müs wrote: Diamondeye wrote: Müs wrote: I dunno, I think its kind of **** gross to make people suffer based on the color of their skin, their national origin, or religion. If they don't want to be called nazis, they shouldn't do nazi-esque things. Since "not giving people exactly what they want at public expense" isn't "making them suffer", you don't have much to worry about. "I'll take 'People that are catastrophically missing the point' for $800 Alex". Who is Mus Yes yes. Well done. You got me. I am chastened. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |