This is how we know we're living in a country where 'hate' and 'oppression' are real problems. When they're real problems, you don't try to manufacture more of it.

Um, what?

Real hatred to combat would mean (to me) that when war starts, it's no holds barred. A nation can't be against combat in theory since it doesn't take 2 to tango.

People who are suffering actual oppression and hatred don't try to invent more on top of what they're already suffering?

This seems like a fairly straightforward concept.

However, we're not talking about real wars here, but the "wars" on various forms of bias that the left imagines itself to be fighting.

This is how we know we're living in a country where 'hate' and 'oppression' are [sic] real problems. When they're real problems, you don't try to manufacture more of it.

Who pays those that travel from riot to riot? Where's the money coming from that finance the professional **** disturbers? Soros? I have no idea, but it takes money to mount the kind of attacks that are being waged against this country.

You're kidding, right?

For all its talk of being a street uprising, Black Lives Matter is increasingly awash in cash, raking in pledges of more than $100 million from liberal foundations and others eager to contribute to what has become the grant-making cause du jour.

The Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy recently announced the formation of the Black-Led Movement Fund [BLMF], a six-year pooled donor campaign aimed at raising $100 million for the Movement for Black Lives coalition.

That funding comes in addition to more than $33 million in grants to the Black Lives Matter movement from top Democratic Party donor George Soros through his Open Society Foundations, as well as grant-making from the Center for American Progress.

People who are suffering actual oppression and hatred don't try to invent more on top of what they're already suffering?

This seems like a fairly straightforward concept.

BLM, Occupy, etc. They're funded to the hilt. moveon.org makes no bones about it, they take cash to protest Trump. It's big business, raking muck.

Why is "funded" somehow perjorative?

You're making a strong case for an argument that you simply don't believe oppression in America exists because you don't suffer it yourself.

Repeatedly posting Anecdotes and then making blanket claims about lack of racism, persecution, etc smells of trying to overwhelm stats with quips. Find statistics that back up your claim or you're just posting smoke

I'm pretty sure propaganda is still a thing even when the subject of the propaganda is already legitimately terrible. I mean, hell, we made up and exaggerated various things about the Soviets and the Nazis, and they were actual mass murdering, totalitarian regimes bent on world domination.

Because of the violence these groups advocate and the resulting consequences, those funding BLM and such are complicit. The shootings, looting, and associated violence at these events is a direct result of those financially supporting these criminals.

Every political movement requires cash. Including all your right-wing **** everyone but white Protestant anglo Saxon males movements. Why is "funded" somehow perjorative?

All you're trying to do here is perpetuate the false narrative that liberals are somehow lazy and get paid by rich people to protest.

So if a church funds an anti-abortion group, and members of that group bomb an abortion clinic, the church should be held responsible?

So if a church funds an anti-abortion group, and members of that group bomb an abortion clinic, the church should be held responsible?

Get evidence that the leader of the group funding the movement had advocated the bombing, then absolutely.

How do you apply this theory of accountability to citizens and criminal government activity?