The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
The culture https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1191 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | The culture |
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... stpop_read Just read this in the WSJ. Posted the link, and I think this line is so true: "It cannot be exaggerated, how much Americans feel besieged by the culture of their own country, and to what lengths they have to go to protect their children from it." So very true, in so many corners of this country. |
Author: | shuyung [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Oh noes! The Apocalypse is coming! Human sacrifice, cats and dogs living together ... mass hysteria! |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
shuyung wrote: Oh noes! The Apocalypse is coming! Human sacrifice, cats and dogs living together ... mass hysteria! I am shocked. Shocked, I say, that someone would have such a reaction. It suddenly occurs to me that this sort of reaction is very similar to whistling while walking past a graveyard. |
Author: | Müs [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
If I had kids, (which I don't), there's a lot of BS I would need to protect them from. |
Author: | Corolinth [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Like Jesus and racism? |
Author: | darksiege [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
They need not be protected from Racism, they need be taught not to be racist. |
Author: | shuyung [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Beryllin wrote: It suddenly occurs to me that this sort of reaction is very similar to whistling while walking past a graveyard. That would depend almost entirely on whether you knew what "whistling past the graveyard" meant. I, for one, am not forcing any cheer. Instead, I am with clear conscience making mock of the junk psychology and rather specious claims of the article, and your apparently wholehearted support for the same. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
I'm really not seeing how the statistics in the opening paragraphs support the argument the writer is making later on. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
It is an opinion piece, that I (and I believe) and many Americans share. As stated, 55% of Americans believe the country is going in the wrong direction, and I do not believe that it is entirely economics causing that disatisfaction. IMO, it is change in our culture that is the underlying cause. I don't know what circles you folks travel in, but opinion pieces like this seem to echo what I see and hear around me, and have for years now. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Beryllin wrote: It is an opinion piece, that I (and I believe) and many Americans share. As stated, 55% of Americans believe the country is going in the wrong direction, and I do not believe that it is entirely economics causing that disatisfaction. IMO, it is change in our culture that is the underlying cause. I'd point out the leap in logic on thinking a poll about economic issues can be extrapolated in its responses to other cultural issues. "Going in the wrong direction" is a very vague and subjective question, and so is "many Americans". If 1 million Americans believe something it is only 1/3 of 1% of the population but could still be described as "many". I agree that some aspects of our culture are objectinable, but I don't spend any time bemoaning that. Part of the idea of this country is that "objectionable" is generally something we allow. Quote: I don't know what circles you folks travel in, but opinion pieces like this seem to echo what I see and hear around me, and have for years now. I don't think it's possible to respond to this without appearing sarcastic at best or flaming at worst. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Opinions can be vague and subjective. It's ok. May be right, may be wrong. Just something to think about, or reject out of hand for those who don't want to bother. Whatever. |
Author: | Monte [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
In 2007 only 28% of the people thought we were going in the *right* direction, and I am fairly certain those numbers trended down as the Bush administration ground down. Those numbers the author is wringing his hands over ironically represent a significant uptick in the country's optimism, not a crisis of culture. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Monte wrote: In 2007 only 28% of the people thought we were going in the *right* direction, and I am fairly certain those numbers trended down as the Bush administration ground down. Those numbers the author is wringing his hands over ironically represent a significant uptick in the country's optimism, not a crisis of culture. It doesn't matter, Montegue, she's still right. Who knew that Adam Lambert was going to have an act that included simulated oral sex on broadcast tv? Say "change the channel' all you want, if you're not aware that something like that is going to be broadcast, it's like closing the barn door after the horse gets out. That is a cultural issue that has many folks uneasy at a minimum, and your tap-dancing on the Bush administration doesn't deflect it as much as you might like. |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Government should not regulate broadcasts for content. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Beryllin wrote: It doesn't matter, Montegue, she's still right. Who knew that Adam Lambert was going to have an act that included simulated oral sex on broadcast tv? Say "change the channel' all you want, if you're not aware that something like that is going to be broadcast, it's like closing the barn door after the horse gets out. That is a cultural issue that has many folks uneasy at a minimum, and your tap-dancing on the Bush administration doesn't deflect it as much as you might like. You are seriously arguing that everyone should be prevented from watching something because you or your children might see a few seconds of something objectionable before you can change the channel? And I thought it was liberals who got **** on for allegedly trying to raise their kids in sensory deprivation tanks. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Xequecal wrote: Beryllin wrote: It doesn't matter, Montegue, she's still right. Who knew that Adam Lambert was going to have an act that included simulated oral sex on broadcast tv? Say "change the channel' all you want, if you're not aware that something like that is going to be broadcast, it's like closing the barn door after the horse gets out. That is a cultural issue that has many folks uneasy at a minimum, and your tap-dancing on the Bush administration doesn't deflect it as much as you might like. You are seriously arguing that everyone should be prevented from watching something because you or your children might see a few seconds of something objectionable before you can change the channel? And I thought it was liberals who got **** on for allegedly trying to raise their kids in sensory deprivation tanks. *sigh* Actually, I'm agreeing with the sentiments expressed in the article, and the portion I quoted: "It cannot be exaggerated, how much Americans feel besieged by the culture of their own country, and to what lengths they have to go to protect their children from it." |
Author: | Khross [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Let's get this out of the way before this thread goes the way of irreconcilably stupid ... The author of the opinion piece doesn't have the first clue as to what "culture" is. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Khross wrote: Let's get this out of the way before this thread goes the way of irreconcilably stupid ... The author of the opinion piece doesn't have the first clue as to what "culture" is. Attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message? That's beneath you, Khross. But, whatever. |
Author: | Dash [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
I think it worked pretty much as it should have. ABC puts out a product, if the product offends people they wont indulge in it anymore. I wouldnt feel the need to protect my kid from Adam Lambert, but I definitely get that many parents wouldnt want their kid watching that ****. Same with 99% of the rest of the pop culture nonsense. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Dash wrote: I think it worked pretty much as it should have. ABC puts out a product, if the product offends people they wont indulge in it anymore. I wouldnt feel the need to protect my kid from Adam Lambert, but I definitely get that many parents wouldnt want their kid watching that ****. Same with 99% of the rest of the pop culture nonsense. Thank you. Finally, someone with a reasonable reply. |
Author: | Khross [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Beryllin wrote: Attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message? That's beneath you, Khross. Since the message is predicated on a fallacious and horribly misinformed notion of culture and social hegemony, I have no need to address the senseless and unintelligent drivel that comprises it. Were it an intelligible and reasonably well written piece of prose, I might condone it with a more insightful commentary. However, as the author demonstrates no understanding or even recognition of the topic being engaged, I stand by my observation.
But, whatever. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Khross wrote: Beryllin wrote: Attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message? That's beneath you, Khross. Since the message is predicated on a fallacious and horribly misinformed notion of culture and social hegemony, I have no need to address the senseless and unintelligent drivel that comprises it. Were it an intelligible and reasonably well written piece of prose, I might condone it with a more insightful commentary. However, as the author demonstrates no understanding or even recognition of the topic being engaged, I stand by my observation.But, whatever. And I totally disagree with you, imo she makes valid points. She touches on what some people are feeling about the direction America is going, particularly the breaching of the social compromise. Sorry, but you are wrong on this one. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Beryllin wrote: And I totally disagree with you, imo she makes valid points. She touches on what some people are feeling about the direction America is going, particularly the breaching of the social compromise. Sorry, but you are wrong on this one. You freely admit that you're stating your opinion then tell Khroos he's wrong? In any case, I think you're assuming an unspecified social compromise that may or may not exist, and assuming broad support from it based on the flimsy evidence of your associates and the author's questionable leap from economic to cultural dissatisaction. I doubt most of the poll respondants could really say what direcion the country is supposedly going in beyond vague complaining. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
You're right, I should not have said he is wrong. He has expressed an opinion I disagree with. Mea culpa. |
Author: | Beryllin [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The culture |
Diamondeye wrote: In any case, I think you're assuming an unspecified social compromise that may or may not exist, and assuming broad support from it based on the flimsy evidence of your associates and the author's questionable leap from economic to cultural dissatisaction. I doubt most of the poll respondants could really say what direcion the country is supposedly going in beyond vague complaining. Actually, she spelled out the social compromise quite clearly in the linked article: "We don't care what you do in New York." Meaning, we don't care what you choose to do, but don't force it on us. Adam Lambert's escapades are but the latest in a line of breaches to that social compromise. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |