The Glade 4.0 :: View topic - Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests

Sarah Palin is set to headline another landmark political event: the first-ever Tea Party Convention next month in Nashville, Tenn.

Will someone please just put this pitbull to sleep?
Srsly. Shut her the **** up.

I don't get it. Why don't we like her now?

I can't be sure but it has something to do with the fact that she writes memos on her hand like a *gasp* normal person.

DFK! wrote:

I don't get it. Why don't we like her now?

For me, it's her (i) conspicuous lack of knowledge, intellectual curiosity, or respect for such things;

(ii) shameless pandering to (and apparent personal affinity for) identity politics;

(iii) dangerously simplistic and aggressive foreign policy;

(iv) reflexive dishonesty;

(v) petty and vindictive abuses of power while in office;

Naturally, for the reasons I just stated. I've yet to see anything that demonstrates to me that she is:
1) worse (ethically or knowledgeably) than most other politicians in any way
2) less capable than most other politicians in any way

DFK! wrote:

Other than the fact that allows herself to be documented in a worse position
than some whore on Ritalin?

What "juvenile display" are you referring to?

Serious question, because nothing in your OP link indicates something juvenile to me whatsoever.

I thought some degree of stupidity was a requirement to working as any sort of government official… >=D

Are you really that blind, or are you just provoking a response?

For an ex-presidential candidate to be caught in such a juvenile display is irreprehensible. Either she is faking stupidity for some interest or she is a cow.

So what?

Oh, and Adrak, I don't think that word means what you think it means, per Webster's

Definition: IRREPREHENSIBLE

Adjective

1. Not reprehensible; blameless; innocent.

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

Date "IRREPREHENSIBLE" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 1781. (references)

Judging from the posting style, I'd wager he's intentionally trying to push the limits of Dash's patience.

For me, it's her (i) conspicuous lack of knowledge, intellectual curiosity, or respect for such things;...

DFK, Yes you are silly, yes she is a stupid cow.

What exactly are you defending?

HeLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLfire forever, Yeah!

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Sarah Palin will headline first-ever Tea Party Convention csmonitor Quote: Sarah Palin is set to headline another landmark political event: the first-ever Tea Party Convention next month in Nashville, Tenn. As I said, this movement has been sabotaged from the beginning. Her and her crib notes written on her hand. We need an obvious button.

Author:	Müs [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:16 pm ]
Post subject:
Will someone please just put this pitbull to sleep? Srsly. Shut her the **** up.

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Müs wrote: Will someone please just put this pitbull to sleep? Srsly. Shut her the **** up. Next best thing to the "obvious" button

Author:	DFK! [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:
I don't get it. Why don't we like her now?

Author:	Rorinthas [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
I can't be sure but it has something to do with the fact that she writes memos on her hand like a gasp normal person.

The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/

Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1763	Page 1 of 3

Author:	RangerDave [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re:
DFK! wrote: I don't get it. Why don't we like her now? For me, it's her (i) conspicuous lack of knowledge, intellectual curiosity, or respect for such things; (ii) shameless pandering to (and apparent personal affinity for) identity politics; (iii) dangerously simplistic and aggressive foreign policy; (iv) reflexive dishonesty; and (v) petty and vindictive abuses of power while in office; etc. YMMV, of course.

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Rorinthas wrote: I can't be sure but it has something to do with the fact that she writes memos on her hand like a gasp normal person. Test: You Sir, are an ignoramus.

Author:	DFK! [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
RangerDave wrote: DFK! wrote: I don't get it. Why don't we like her now? For me, it's her (i) conspicuous lack of knowledge, intellectual curiosity, or respect for such things; Evidenced by what? RD wrote: (ii) shameless pandering to (and apparent personal affinity for) identity politics; That's the modern age, and exactly how Obama got elected. You're seriously advocating that she shouldn't use modern tactics? In other words, "she shouldn't do these things because I find them bad, but it's ok when our people do it." RD wrote: (iii) dangerously simplistic and aggressive foreign policy; I don't know the entirety of her foreign policy, but it seems in passing to be no more simplistic than the President's prior to inauguration. The aggressive part I won't dispute. RD wrote: (iv) reflexive dishonesty; Demonstrable over any other similarly-positioned politician, or on equal bearing? RD wrote: (v) petty and vindictive abuses of power while in office; Such as? I suppose you're referring to the ethics violation where she was supposed to have, essentially, known 100% of what was happening in her physical office 100% of the time? RD wrote: YMMV, of course. Naturally, for the reasons I just stated. I've yet to see anything that demonstrates to me that she is: 1) worse (ethically or knowledgeably) than most other politicians in any way 2) less capable than most other politicians in any way

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
DFK! wrote: Naturally, for the reasons I just stated. I've yet to see anything that demonstrates to me that she is: 1) worse (ethically or knowledgeably) than most other politicians in any way 2) less capable than most other politicians in any way Other than the fact that allows herself to be documented in a worse position than some whore on Ritalin?

Author:	DFK! [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
Adrak wrote: DFK! wrote: Naturally, for the reasons I just stated. I've yet to see anything that demonstrates to me that she is: 1) worse (ethically or knowledgeably) than most other politicians in any way 2) less capable than most other politicians in any way Other than the fact that allows herself to be documented in a worse position than some whore on Ritalin? I guess I'm not following you. What position are you talking about? Speaking at the Tea Party Convention? That would require me to agree with some negative assumptions about the Tea Party movement, which I don't.

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Are you really that blind, or are you just provoking a response? For an ex-presidential candidate to be caught in such a juvenile display is reprehensible. Either she is faking stupidity for some interest or she is a cow. So what?

Author:	DFK! [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:
What "juvenile display" are you referring to? Serious question, because nothing in your OP link indicates something juvenile to me whatsoever.

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re:
DFK! wrote: What "juvenile display" are you referring to? Serious question, because nothing in your OP link indicates something juvenile to me whatsoever. My ex-brother-in-law was tarded too, but went on to become a govt official.

Author:	Lydiaa [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:
I thought some degree of stupidity was a requirement to working as any sort of government official… >=D

Author:	DFK! [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:03 am ]
Post subject:
Hey Adrak: Go ** yourself. It isn't my fault you cannot post a logical post, or make logical connections. "Oh look, here's an announcement some big pol is speaking at an event. She's a idiotic cow whore *." Yeah, that makes sense. And I'm* the retard? I ask a genuine question and get idiotic namecalling in response. Good to see where this **** forum is going.

Author:	Uncle Fester [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:35 am ]
Post subject:
So she is an idiot for having a few notes scribbled on her hand, while the president needs a full audio visual set up to speak is a great orator. So barry can be muted with a power outage, but to shut Palin up she needs to be convicted of theft in an Shira law area?

Page 1 of 3	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re:
Lydiaa wrote: I thought some degree of stupidity was a requirement to working as any sort of government official… >=D Sorry, I was referring to DFK

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Thinking of a new indefensible post in "Little" Hellfire. This one bores me.

Author:	Micheal [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Adrak wrote: Are you really that blind, or are you just provoking a response? For an ex-presidential candidate to be caught in such a juvenile display is irreprehensible. Either she is faking stupidity for some interest or she is a cow. So what? She's sold out, is generating income from Fox and working the Tea Bag circuit to generate political capital and keep her in the spotlight and push her toward the next election and be the first TB party (unfortunate initials) candidate for the presidency. My biggest question is, since she couldn't be bothered to finish the term of one office she ran for, why would anyone ever bother voting for her again? Oh, and Adrak, I don't think that word means what you think it means, per Webster's Definition: IRREPREHENSIBLE Adjective 1. Not reprehensible; blameless; innocent. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) Date "IRREPREHENSIBLE" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 1781. (references)

Author:	Adrak [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:37 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Micheal wrote: Oh, and Adrak, I don't think that word means what you think it means, per Webster's Definition: IRREPREHENSIBLE Adjective 1. Not reprehensible; blameless; innocent. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) Date "IRREPREHENSIBLE" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 1781. (references) Fixed Thnx Micheal

Author:	Lenas [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:12 am ]
Post subject:
Judging from the posting style, I'd wager he's intentionally trying to push the limits of Dash's patience.

Author:	Adrak [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:13 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
DFK, Yes you are silly, yes she is a stupid cow. What exactly are you defending? HeLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLfire forever, Yeah!

Author:	Adrak [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:20 am ]
Post subject:	Re:
Lenas wrote: Judging from the posting style, I'd wager he's intentionally trying to push the limits of Dash's patience. No, here you are trying troll

Author:	Khross [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:32 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
RangerDave wrote: For me, it's her (i) conspicuous lack of knowledge, intellectual curiosity, or respect for such things;... This is patently false. I can't really speak to the rest of the post, but even the books bashing her indicate the woman is a lot smarter than most American's think. Of course, most Americans can't tell Palin apart from Tina Fey's portrayal of her in SNL Skits.

Author:	DFK! [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:26 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Sarah Palin Shill For Big-Tea Interests
Adrak wrote: DFK, Yes you are silly, yes she is a stupid cow. What exactly are you defending? HeLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLfire forever, Yeah! I'm defending myself from being called a retard for asking how you get from "Sarah Palin speaks at convention" to "Sarah Palin equals stupid moron slut whore cow idiot."