CHICAGO - When 4-year-old Eric Stavros Adler choked to death on a piece of hot dog, his anguished mother never dreamed that the popular kids' food could be so dangerous.

Some food makers including Oscar Mayer have warning labels about choking, but not nearly enough, says Joan Stavros Adler, Eric's mom.

The American Academy of Pediatrics agrees. The nation's largest pediatricians group is calling for sweeping changes in the way food is designed and labeled to minimize children's chances for choking.

Choking kills more than 100 U.S. children 14 years or younger each year and thousands more — 15,000 in 2001 — are treated in emergency rooms. Food, including candy and gum, is among the leading culprits, along with items like coins and balloons. Of the 141 choking deaths in kids in 2006, 61 were food-related.

Surveillance systems lack detailed information about food choking incidents, which are thought to be underreported but remain a significant and under-appreciated problem, said Dr. Gary Smith, director of the Center for Injury Research and Policy at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

Smith is lead author of a new policy report from the pediatrics academy that seeks to make choking prevention a priority for government and food makers. The report was released Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

Doctors say high-risk foods, including hot dogs, raw carrots, grapes and apples — should be cut into pea-sized pieces for small children to reduce chances of choking. Some say other risky foods, including hard candies, popcorn, peanuts and marshmallows, shouldn't be given to young children at all.

Federal law requires choking warning labels on certain toys including small balls, balloons and games with small parts. Unless food makers voluntarily put more warning labels on high-risk foods, there should be a similar mandate for food, the pediatrics academy says.

Adler, a Warren, N.J. attorney who pushed for more warning labels after her son died in 2001, says she hopes the academy's efforts will work. Several efforts to pass federal legislation for labels have failed in Congress.

The group also urges the Food and Drug Administration to work with other government agencies to establish a nationwide food-related choking reporting system; and to recall foods linked with choking.

The academy says the food industry should avoid shapes and sizes that pose choking risks.

Something as simple as making lollipops flat like a silver dollar instead of round like a pingpong ball can make a big difference, said Bruce Silverglade, legal affairs director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which also has lobbied for more attention to choking prevention.

Grocery Manufacturers Association spokesman Scott Openshaw declined to say whether food makers would consider warning labels or new designs, but said making parents aware of choking dangers is key to keeping kids safe.

Openshaw said the industry would continue working with the FDA and USDA "to ensure that our products are as safe as possible."

At the FDA, spokeswoman Rita Chappelle said the agency will review the academy's analysis and recommendations. She said the FDA also would continue consulting with the Consumer Product Safety Commission on assessing choking hazards associated with food and take action on a case-by-case basis.

Adler considered herself educated about children's safety. Her son had eaten hot dogs before without any problem.

Hot dogs are "almost as American as apple pie," she said. "You really don't know how horrible it can be."

Some food makers including Oscar Mayer have warning labels about choking, but not nearly enough, says Joan Stavros Adler, Eric's mom.

This is a terrible tragedy that her child died, don't get me wrong. But my question is "How did someone who didn't know that any solid food that you eat can possibly choke you manage to procreate?"

Horrible that her child died, but I think people seem to have the idea that there HAS to be someone to blame. No one wants to take the responsibility for their own actions and want to place the blame elsewhere. Possibly also win a lawsuit for big $$$ while they are at it.

It's not my fault he choked, it was obviously Oscar Mayer's fault for not letting me, the consumer, know that this is a hazard.

This is a terrible tragedy that her child died, don't get me wrong. But my question is "How did someone who didn't know that any solid food that you eat can possibly choke you manage to procreate?"

Clearly, not enough 4 year-olds choked to death on hot dogs twenty to thirty years ago.

Someone probably told her (true or not) that hot dogs are "high risk" whatever that means (again, true or not) and that's all you need sometimes when a tragedy hits.

By way of example, it certainly seems that no one in this thread knew it.

They can't be that lethal. In the United States alone there are 300 million people. If a hundred die from choking on hot dogs every year, and 15,000 more have to go to the hospital, that means they're a nonissue.

QFT. Not only that, but it's 100 and 15,000 from choking in general, not specifically from hot dogs.

This issue is so insignificant as to be unworthy of news coverage, much less government action.

But surely you concede it is significant enough to warrant moral outrage.

They can't be that lethal. In the United States alone there are 300 million people. If a hundred die from choking on hot dogs every year, and 15,000 more have to go to the hospital, that means they're a nonissue.