The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

HA! Vindication!
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1991
Page 1 of 1

Author:  TheRiov [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:26 pm ]
Post subject:  HA! Vindication!

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/li ... tml?hpt=C2




hehe. I will point out in the spirit of fairness that intelligent people make mistakes too and are known to be wrong.

Author:  Elmarnieh [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

People can't be truly concerned about the well being of 15-20 people. Its a physiological limit.

Author:  Vindicarre [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

So, what Kanazawa is telling is that those who are more intelligent tend to look for things to do/believe that are against the norm.

Or:
Quote:
Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism...

In either case these beliefs have little to do with the veracity of their "against the grain" stances, and more to do with the people themselves.
That's pretty telling.

Author:  shuyung [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

106 is not "smart".

Author:  Micheal [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Intelligence does not equal wisdom.

Author:  Jocificus [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: HA! Vindication!

Quote:
In fact, aligning oneself with "unconventional" philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be "ways to communicate to everyone that you're pretty smart," he said.


Unconventional? Haven't these guys visited a college campus lately? Hell, I'm even in conservative Utah and I meet far more people who would consider themselves liberal than anything else in my classes and stuff.

But I definitely agree that in general people would like you to believe that they're smart when they tell you they're liberal.

Author:  Midgen [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

I've known some really "intelligent" people who make horrible decisions.

Author:  Lex Luthor [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

Intelligence doesn't cure laziness, apathy, poor social skills, recklessness, and many other such character flaws. A high intelligence is secondary to many other traits in advancing a person's well-being.

Author:  Müs [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:57 am ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Behaviors may stem from desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ
For men, sexual exclusivity goes against the grain evolutionarily
None of this means that humans are evolving toward a future where such traits are the default


Makes sense to me. Men are chest thumping whores that'll shag everything that moves, and only the smart ones can resist.

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:49 am ]
Post subject: 

I find the definition they use for liberalism vs. conservatism in that study interesting. It changes the meaning vs. what many readers would probably assume had they skimmed the article.

Author:  Taskiss [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

They interviewed kids. People's brains and philosophies aren't completely formed until their late 20's at the earliest.

http://web1.tch.harvard.edu/dream/summe ... brain.html
Quote:
Two discoveries prompted much of their scientific interest: that teenagers' brains are only about 80 percent fully developed and that brain development isn't complete until people reach their 20s or even 30s—more than a decade later than experts had thought.

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

Taskiss wrote:
They interviewed kids. People's brains and philosophies aren't completely formed until their late 20's at the earliest.

http://web1.tch.harvard.edu/dream/summe ... brain.html
Quote:
Two discoveries prompted much of their scientific interest: that teenagers' brains are only about 80 percent fully developed and that brain development isn't complete until people reach their 20s or even 30s—more than a decade later than experts had thought.


I wonder if that's always been the case, or if this has resulted from our increased longevity? In other words, whe the average life expectancy was 30 years, did the brains develop the entire time or were they developed by, say 18?

Author:  Diamondeye [ Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: HA! Vindication!

I doubt it. Part of the reason life expectancy is so low in earlier eras is the infant and childhood moratlity rate. People who survived to adulthood generally did expect to live considerably longer than age 30.

Author:  Müs [ Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:17 am ]
Post subject: 

Yeh, with a LE of 30, we'd have 16 year olds having mid-life crises.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/