The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Puerto Rico statehood? https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2778 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | darksiege [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Puerto Rico statehood? |
Article Thingy I have no clue about the bias of this website. Quote: Last night (Tuesday) on his TV show, Glenn Beck dropped another bombshell — on Thursday, Congress will take up a bill to make Puerto Rico a state. Why is our Congress doing this now? Secretly? Quickly? If it hadn’t been for one of Beck’s “Refounders” (a Congressional insider), would we even know about this? Why is this important to you and me?
Well, the word is out, and my local 9-12/Tea party organization sent this out this morning. First thing to hit my mailbox, in fact… There is a bill to make Puerto Rico a state. Again, they are trying to pull one over on us and on Puerto Ricans, who have consistently said they do not want to become a state. Read below for more information (from Eagle Forum). This was also discussed by Rep Tom Price on a conference call yesterday. Please consider this: * The U.S. would transform, overnight, into a bilingual nation. At least half of Puerto Ricans do not speak English, the language of our U.S. Constitution and founding documents. The Washington Times article, “Puerto Rican statehood,” analyzes all the implications of adding a foreign language-speaking state to the Union. * It would bring immediate demands for massive federal spending. The average income of Puerto Ricans is less than half that of our poorest state, and infrastructure and the environment are far below American standards. Puerto Rico has a population with a median national income of $17,741, nearly a third of that for the U.S. * Puerto Rico is already a democracy. Despite the bill’s deceptive title, Puerto Rico already has an elected government and exists as a self-governed commonwealth of the U.S. * Statehood would give Puerto Rico more congressional representation than 25 of our 50 states! It would inevitably give Democrats two additional U.S. Senators and 6 to 8 additional Members of the House. H.R. 2499 is stealth legislation designed to lead to the admission of Spanish-speaking Puerto Rico as the 51st state, thereby making us a de facto bilingual nation, like Canada. The U.S. Congress should not be forcing Puerto Ricans to vote on statehood, especially since the Puerto Rican people have rejected statehood three times since 1991! No Member of Congress who describes himself as a limited government, fiscal conservative should be casting a YEA vote for H.R. 2499, as Puerto Rican statehood would cause an immediate increase in federal expenditures, particularly for taxpayer-funded welfare state services. Sponsored by Puerto Rican delegate Pedro Pierluisi (D), the Puerto Rico Democracy Act (H.R. 2499) – which has reared its ugly head a number of times over the past few congresses but has yet to have any success – would require Puerto Ricans to hold a national referendum to decide if they want Puerto Rico to remain a self-governing U.S. commonwealth, or become the 51st state. The referendum would be set up as two plebiscites which would effectively deceive Puerto Ricans into voting for statehood. In the first round of votes, the Puerto Rican people would be given the choice between remaining a U.S. territory and “pursuing a different political status.” If the majority votes to maintain the status quo, this bill would require that Puerto Rico vote on this same issue every eight years. If the majority votes for “different status,” a second round of votes would be held where Puerto Ricans would choose either statehood or independence-the status quo of “U.S. territory” would not even be an option! In other words, the two ballots would be rigged to favor the outcome of statehood, overriding the wishes of Americans and Puerto Ricans who want to maintain the current commonwealth status. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I can't ascertain the real purpose of this bill, as Puerto Ricans have already voted multiple times not to become a state; what the real purpose of this non-binding resolution is, I haven't taken the time to fathom. Biggovernment.com has a pretty anti-left lean. They're the ones who brought you the ACORN videos. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
It may be as simple as bringing it up to specifically defeat it. If it's been bouncing around a while, it may be getting annoying. Bring it to a vote, flatten it, and move on? |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Flatten what? They've voted on it before, they'll vote on it again, why does the Fed Gov't have to pass some resolution for this to occur? Something's stinky. |
Author: | FarSky [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Why, of course Puerto Rico should become a state! I suggest you educate yourself on their strengths, including their air, which supports planes just as well as the not-better United States'! [youtube]cQ3o0wJF-dA[/youtube] [youtube]Ak3rKqSn8U8[/youtube] |
Author: | damaged [ Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It's a plot by Mississippi and West Virginia so they can not be the bottom of the list on the income front. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
FarSky wrote: Why, of course Puerto Rico should become a state! I suggest you educate yourself on their strengths, including their air, which supports planes just as well as the not-better United States'! I can't watch videos here, but most of the time I can guess what they contain. I'm having a difficult time figuring out what kind of hilarious nonsense is contained in those videos that would compel you to make your post. /can't wait to get home. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
FarSky wrote: Why, of course Puerto Rico should become a state! I suggest you educate yourself on their strengths, including their air, which supports planes just as well as the not-better United States'! [youtube]cQ3o0wJF-dA[/youtube] [youtube]Ak3rKqSn8U8[/youtube] Hooray for Progress Island!!! |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
If they want to be a state I don't have any opposition to that. However my general understanding is the answer has for a long time been "no thanks" as far as all the postulating about the whole becoming a bilingual nation, I say: 1. So what? 2. Go to south Texas sometime. They don't have traffic signs in Spanish, but there is still a lot of support for the Spanish speakers. |
Author: | Rynar [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: If they want to be a state I don't have any opposition to that. However my general understanding is the answer has for a long time been "no thanks" as far as all the postulating about the whole becoming a bilingual nation, I say: 1. So what? 2. Go to south Texas sometime. They don't have traffic signs in Spanish, but there is still a lot of support for the Spanish speakers. It is the costs of running two governments, one in English, and one in Spanish, that causes the problems. |
Author: | LadyKate [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Maybe my degree in Spanish will finally become useful and make me some money. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |