The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

President Obama Seeks to Weaken Miranda Rights
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2899
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Rynar [ Tue May 11, 2010 12:20 pm ]
Post subject:  President Obama Seeks to Weaken Miranda Rights

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/09/administration-wants-weaker-miranda-rules/

Quote:
Administration wants weaker Miranda rules
by David Eldridge

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said Sunday the administration wants a "public safety exception" to allow investigators to question terror suspects before they are read their Miranda rights or allowed to consult with a lawyer.

Mr. Holder, appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday, said the law enforcement community needs more flexibility to question suspects -- within constitutional bounds.

The attorney general defended the Obama administration, which has been criticized for reading Miranda rights to the suspects in the Times Square bombing attempt and the Christmas Day attempt to blow up an airliner over Detroit.

Mr. Holder said Faisal Shahzad, the Times Square suspect, continued to answer questions after getting the Miranda warnings, but that the administration had changed its position on the Miranda rights because of the "threats that we now face."

On ABC's "This Week," Mr. Holder said: "The [Miranda] system we have in place has proven to be effective. I think we also want to look and determine whether we have the necessary flexibility -- whether we have a system that deals with situations that agents now confront. . . . We're now dealing with international terrorism. . . . I think we have to give serious consideration to at least modifying that public-safety exception."

Author:  Elmarnieh [ Tue May 11, 2010 12:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yeah I heard mumblings about this on the weekend but they aren't pushing for anything specific. Its going to be a turd sandwich but I don't know what it is going to have as its bread yet.

Author:  Müs [ Tue May 11, 2010 12:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

At this point, if I saw a headline "Obama Cheerfully eats Puppy Sandwich in Oval Office"

I wouldn't be surprised.

Author:  RangerDave [ Tue May 11, 2010 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Müs wrote:
At this point, if I saw a headline "Obama Cheerfully eats Puppy Sandwich in Oval Office"

I wouldn't be surprised.


Well, there is a Facebook group for it:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=35302441122

Author:  Müs [ Tue May 11, 2010 1:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

<--- Is not Surprised.

Author:  Hopwin [ Tue May 11, 2010 1:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

I like how they try to deflect it so that the argument is whether or not someone is read their Miranda rights when in actuality they are really suspending the right to defense.

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Tue May 11, 2010 1:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

Insistence on reading terrorists their rights was one of the few positives I had about Obama.

The worst part is, the populous will probably love this.

Author:  Kaffis Mark V [ Tue May 11, 2010 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Hopwin wrote:
I like how they try to deflect it so that the argument is whether or not someone is read their Miranda rights when in actuality they are really suspending the right to defense.

My thoughts exactly.

Author:  Leshani [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

Caught on U.S soil and/or U.S Citizen read them there rights, outside the U.S, non U.S. Citizen all bets are off.

Author:  Elmarnieh [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

Thats how it currently works and should work Leshani.

Author:  Leshani [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

and the way it needs to stay.

Author:  DFK! [ Thu May 13, 2010 1:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

What saddens me is how many libertarians probably voted for Obama thinking he was going to be a civil rights improvement, especially compared to McCain, and thus overlooked his leftist financial leanings.

I remember a bunch of high-pro ones publicly stating so on Reason prior to the election. Instead, they got neither civil rights nor fiscal discipline.

Not that the group was large enough to sway the election or anything, just that I think it's sad they would have so misused their vote.

Author:  RangerDave [ Thu May 13, 2010 1:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

DFK! wrote:
Instead, they got neither civil rights nor fiscal discipline.


I think both would have been worse under McCain, but yeah, Obama's been a big disappointment for me on the civil rights front.

Author:  Elmarnieh [ Thu May 13, 2010 1:55 pm ]
Post subject: 

It took about two week for the ACLU to start sending email blasts that they were "concerned" over the direction of his administration.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/