The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Gay marriage https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3420 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Gay marriage |
*pulls pin* tosses..runs http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1 Quote: BOSTON (AP) - A U.S. judge in Boston has ruled that a federal gay marriage ban is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right a state to define marriage.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro on Thursday ruled in favor of gay couples' rights in two separate challenges to the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. The state had argued the law denied benefits such as Medicaid to gay married couples in Massachusetts, where same-sex unions have been legal since 2004. Tauro agreed, and said the act forces Massachusetts to discriminate against its own citizens. The Justice Department argued the federal government has the right to set eligibility requirements for federal benefits—including requiring that those benefits only go to couples in marriages between a man and a woman. Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click here to buy text ads on Breitbart |
Author: | Lenas [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good for Boston. |
Author: | Khross [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gay marriage |
I'll need to read the decision, but overturning DOMA is actually a constitutional positive. The reasoning, however, is likely horrendous. |
Author: | darksiege [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gay marriage |
Quote: The Justice Department argued the federal government has the right to set eligibility requirements for federal benefits—including requiring that those benefits only go to couples in marriages between a man and a woman. ... |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'll take a states rights argument anyday. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm with Khross -- overturning DOMA isn't bad, per se, but letting States argue that they get to define the language used in Federal law is pretty.. troublesome. |
Author: | Monte [ Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The ruling seems to be that the Federal government has no interest in regulating who can and cannot be married. The ruling is also based on the equal protection clause, and found no reason other than discrimination and politics supporting DOMA in the first place. Great ruling, and I hope it does not get appealed to the USCC. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |