The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Atheism is apparently a religion https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3511 |
Page 1 of 11 |
Author: | Taskiss [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Atheism is apparently a religion |
It's been my opinion (since observing many "there's no God" arguments) that there are atheists that are so enamored with their belief system that it is their de facto religion... Seems a true atheist would, if asked if there was a God, reply "Huh? I don't know... never thought about it much" and then go on with life. Many who are vehemently against the thought seems to already have a higher power they worship. Looks like I was right ... at least for some folks. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/17/at ... latestnews Quote: American atheists lined up to be "de-baptized" in a ritual using a hair dryer, according to a report Friday on U.S. late-night news program "Nightline."
Leading atheist Edwin Kagin blasted his fellow non-believers with the hair dryer to symbolically dry up the holy water sprinkled on their heads in days past. The styling tool was emblazoned with a label reading "Reason and Truth." Kagin believes parents are wrong to baptize their children before they are able to make their own choices, even slamming some religious eduction as "child abuse." He said the blast of hot air was a way for adults to undo what their parents had done. "I was baptized Catholic. I don't remember any of it at all," said 24-year-old Cambridge Boxterman. "According to my mother, I screamed like a banshee ... so you can see that even as a young child I didn't want to be baptized. It's not fair. I was born atheist, and they were forcing me to become Catholic." Kagin doned a monk's robe and said a few mock-Latin phrases before inviting those wishing to be de-baptized to "come forward now and receive the spirit of hot air that taketh away the stigma and taketh away the remnants of the stain of baptismal water." Ironically, Kagin's own son became a fundamentalist Christian minister after having "a personal revelation in Jesus Christ." "One wonders where they went wrong," he chuckled to the TV show. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Well, in order to have the protection of the Free Exercise clause it has to be a religion legally speaking. We've been over the issue a few times here in the past (I think during your absence) and it's pretty much unavoidable that Atheism, other than the "I don't know if there's a God, but I don't think so and don't believe in Him, but I don't care what anyone else thinks" variety is, in fact, a religion. Those who've protested that it isn't seem to want it not to be so that it can evade the Establishment clause and be the state religion without being the state religion. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Diamondeye wrote: Well, in order to have the protection of the Free Exercise clause it has to be a religion legally speaking. We've been over the issue a few times here in the past (I think during your absence) and it's pretty much unavoidable that Atheism, other than the "I don't know if there's a God, but I don't think so and don't believe in Him, but I don't care what anyone else thinks" variety is, in fact, a religion. Those who've protested that it isn't seem to want it not to be so that it can evade the Establishment clause and be the state religion without being the state religion. I would disagree. If a strong-belief system (that is not fact based) and ritual made this a religion then we would have to expand the definition to include fraternities, the Masons, sports teams and a lot of things that we would not normally consider a religion. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Hopwin wrote: I would disagree. If a strong-belief system (that is not fact based) and ritual made this a religion then we would have to expand the definition to include fraternities, the Masons, sports teams and a lot of things that we would not normally consider a religion. Those organizations don't try to position themselves ... to contrast themselves ... as alternatives to any particular religion though. There's no competition between being a Mason and being a Baptist - one can consider oneself to be members of both at the same time without any incongruity. Now, being an atheist pretty much excludes someone from being Baptist...just as being a Baptist precludes someone from being a Catholic or any other religion/denomination. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Hopwin wrote: Diamondeye wrote: Well, in order to have the protection of the Free Exercise clause it has to be a religion legally speaking. We've been over the issue a few times here in the past (I think during your absence) and it's pretty much unavoidable that Atheism, other than the "I don't know if there's a God, but I don't think so and don't believe in Him, but I don't care what anyone else thinks" variety is, in fact, a religion. Those who've protested that it isn't seem to want it not to be so that it can evade the Establishment clause and be the state religion without being the state religion. I would disagree. If a strong-belief system (that is not fact based) and ritual made this a religion then we would have to expand the definition to include fraternities, the Masons, sports teams and a lot of things that we would not normally consider a religion. Some of those could very well be religions to their followers, but for the most part they lack the necessary component of having any particular belief about the existance or not of anything supernatural. The Masons and some fraternities might be exceptions though. I don't see anything wrong with considering Masonry a religion and protected by Free Exercise. |
Author: | Aizle [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:45 am ] |
Post subject: | |
This is the most retarded thing I've ever heard of. Both the actions in the article as well as the commentary of the posters here. What is appalling to me is that there are some athiests who are apparently trying to create a religion out of athiesm. Sadly I suspect that they may be successful at some point. |
Author: | Rynar [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Gonna explain why the commentary has been "retarded," or just gonna stick to that good ol' low-brow we're becoming accustomed to from you? |
Author: | Aizle [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I've explained my position on why athiesm is not a religion many times on these forums, I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it again. |
Author: | Rynar [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
But you will take the time to tell others that their views are "retarded"? |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rynar wrote: But you will take the time to tell others that their views are "retarded"? Well, that is, in my experience, generally what atheism is about. At least, from a behavioralist perspective. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: Rynar wrote: But you will take the time to tell others that their views are "retarded"? Well, that is, in my experience, generally what atheism is about. At least, from a behavioralist perspective. For some, perhaps, just as the discussion of the bible being uncorrupted or capable of literal intrepretation is for some. That said, I don't thing the conversation was retarded. Atheism is in the same sphere of belief systems as religion, heck, if asked what religion one is, "atheist" is a perfectly acceptable identifier, in my opinion. And, from the article I linked to, it's obvious some folks approach atheism as a religion with just as formal an approach as the Roman Catholics (I picked them 'cause I know that religion best). I guess I don't believe in UFO's either, or the power of crystals, homeopathy, or reincarnation...but I don't get my knickers in a knot when exposed to folks that do believe. It just doesn't flip my switch. I also don't get all up in arms when some confuse astrology with astronomy. Some do. Meh, so what? |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: Rynar wrote: But you will take the time to tell others that their views are "retarded"? Well, that is, in my experience, generally what atheism is about. At least, from a behavioralist perspective. Actually, there it is. Taskiss - "I don't know, really" is not atheism, IMO. "That's retarded" is. So is "no, I don't think there is a God." It's not a religion IMO until it becomes an active believe that affects your actions in some way. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, as has been discussed ad nauseam, "I don't know, really" is an agnostic if you're honest about definitions. I know it's not as hip and cool as declaring yourself atheist, because all the cool kids are atheist, not agnostic. That's my theory on where the "No, I don't believe there's no god, I'm just an atheist that's not sure" crap comes from. That, or poor education. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: Yeah, as has been discussed ad nauseam, "I don't know, really" is an agnostic if you're honest about definitions. I know it's not as hip and cool as declaring yourself atheist, because all the cool kids are atheist, not agnostic. That's my theory on where the "No, I don't believe there's no god, I'm just an atheist that's not sure" crap comes from. That, or poor education. I guess the question is, is atheism a belief or a non-belief?In the article, it seems to be a belief that folks would claim offers a higher degree of relevance than the belief in a deity. The yin that can't exist without the yang. A non-belief seems to lack anything to push against, if you will, and in my opinion one can't get too excited about something one doesn't believe in. |
Author: | Khross [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Aizle wrote: I've explained my position on why athiesm is not a religion many times on these forums, I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it again. Yes, you've explained. And, when confronted with the reality of how Atheism is practiced, continually fall back on the No True Scotsman fallacy. More to the point, New Atheism and Atheism as you describe it both require active disbelief, which makes both irrational and faith based.
|
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Atheism is a meme just like religion... it's something you'd never come up with on your own. Hence a belief system. If you were born into a white cubic room then you'd have no idea about anything. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: Rynar wrote: But you will take the time to tell others that their views are "retarded"? Well, that is, in my experience, generally what atheism is about. At least, from a behavioralist perspective. Come on man, don't lump me in that **** :[ |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
If Atheism becomes a religion does that mean we can get our schools to stop teaching it as truth? |
Author: | Aizle [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: If Atheism becomes a religion does that mean we can get our schools to stop teaching it as truth? Don't we have to start teaching it as truth first? I have yet to see or hear of a single school anywhere that does this. |
Author: | Lenas [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: If Atheism becomes a religion does that mean we can get our schools to stop teaching it as truth? Trying to start a creationism vs. evolution debate? You know how that'll end. |
Author: | Aizle [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Khross wrote: Aizle wrote: I've explained my position on why athiesm is not a religion many times on these forums, I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it again. Yes, you've explained. And, when confronted with the reality of how Atheism is practiced, continually fall back on the No True Scotsman fallacy. More to the point, New Atheism and Atheism as you describe it both require active disbelief, which makes both irrational and faith based.Dude, this is exactly what I mean by "retarded". Atheism isn't "practiced" as a general rule. Yes there are some zealotous morons out there who are trying to put some ritual around their beliefs, but that is the exception not the rule. Similarly ritual does not equal religion. The Masons, Hell's Angels, Daughters of the Revolution and Sojourners all have rituals they observe in their meetins, yet none are religious organizations. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Aizle wrote: Khross wrote: Aizle wrote: I've explained my position on why athiesm is not a religion many times on these forums, I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it again. Yes, you've explained. And, when confronted with the reality of how Atheism is practiced, continually fall back on the No True Scotsman fallacy. More to the point, New Atheism and Atheism as you describe it both require active disbelief, which makes both irrational and faith based.Dude, this is exactly what I mean by "retarded". Atheism isn't "practiced" as a general rule. Yes there are some zealotous morons out there who are trying to put some ritual around their beliefs, but that is the exception not the rule. Similarly ritual does not equal religion. The Masons, Hell's Angels, Daughters of the Revolution and Sojourners all have rituals they observe in their meetins, yet none are religious organizations. And the point of the organization is not religion. If the point were religious, they would be religions. Sorry but you can't meet with a group of people regularly, talk about your common beliefs about religion, have some rituals to reinforce that you all believe the same thing regarding religion, and then claim it's not religious. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Just pointing out that in their attempt to separate churches from the state, they've created an establishment of the belief system which promotes an absence of divine power. I think both sides of the issue can be taught in schools and students all beliefs should be free to display their religion as openly as they feel individually comfortable while on school grounds. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
As I've said before, I'm uncomfortable labeling atheism as a religion because then by the same logic you can label pretty much anything as a religion. HIGW is now a religion. So is every conspiracy theory. |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Atheism is apparently a religion |
Xequecal wrote: As I've said before, I'm uncomfortable labeling atheism as a religion because then by the same logic you can label pretty much anything as a religion. HIGW is now a religion. So is every conspiracy theory. Yes, but your belief in HIGW or conspiracy theories aren't affected by belief or lack thereof in a god. Being an atheist precludes a belief in a god, and belief in a god precludes being an athiest. It's in the same category and can't be separated from it, just as surely as if you believe the Pope is the leader of the True Church you can't be a Baptist, or believe Jesus was just a prophet and be a Christian. As it's practiced by many, it's a religion and it's tenets are structured and principled in exactly the same manner (as the original article shows), only, as in all religions, the ideologies are different in some fundamental way. |
Page 1 of 11 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |