/chuckle
But they try, and it's accessible.

Morality does it exist. The nature of morality is another subject entirely.

Morality as it pertains to everyday life doesn't exist. Obviously as a word it exists.

edit:

I guess it can exist, but it varies on individual interpretations. Morality is pretty much a cultural meme.

I like this one too.
http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/check.php

30%

The dillemma about the "decision 1 (A) saves 200 people, (B) has a 33% chance of saving 600 people" vs. "decision 2 (A) kills 400 people, (B) has a 66% chance of killing 600 people" was nearly paralyzing. Ultimately, they are the same thing. It was not a moral dillemma at all, it was a choice of whether I prefer to take the sure thing or gamble on the odds.

I thought philosophy is supposed to be logical? A question like "Which color do you like more, red or blue?" isn't very philosophical but is in the same ballpark as some of these questions.

27%

Although they marekd me down for the art is perception bit, and I disagree. I agreed that "Judgements about works of art are purely matters of taste, and that "Michaelangelo is one of history's finest artists". That is perfectly consistent. Michaelangelo's art matches my taste. They didn't ask whether it was "empirically true" that M is one of history's finest artists heheh.

That said, moral realism is politically unpopular in academic circles (for the most part).

The overwhelming majority of the population does not appreciate the difference between if and iff.

That quiz reminds of some posters here, they force you to choose A) or B) and then shout you down about contradictions when you really prefer C).