The Glade 4.0 :: View topic - TSA the molester

after watching the "grope" video on the internet...

I do not get it, where was this groping? The TSA agent was explaining the whole process, made sure that the parent had full visibility to everything that was being done, and I saw no groping.

That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that, but to call it groping is a bit disingenuous.

darksiege wrote:

Yeah well I'm gonna save this post and rub it in your face when radicalized white toddlers start making our planes fall outta the sky you sympathizer!

That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that...

Because when planes are hijacked, it doesn't just affect the lives of the people on board the plane. Your freedom to choose an airline that has a lower level screening process (or none) would also provide the means for a terrorist to bomb or otherwise destroy lives and people not even on the plane.

LadyKate wrote:

So why don't we have screenings for renting trucks, purchasing fertilizer, driving on highways, or parking near buildings?

In fact almost every time someone steps into public they should be screened because their actions could have an affect on the lives of others.

Author:	Uncle Fester [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:38 pm ]
Post subject:	TSA the molester
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42568865/ns ... ?GT1=43001 But at least we are safe!

Author:	Stathol [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:59 pm ]
Post subject:
Today I learned that there's a wikipedia article for "Don't touch my junk"

Author:	Lex Luthor [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:
The TSA should never have existed in the first place. Changing their practices isn't enough. It should be dismantled.

Author:	Hannibal [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:
Wait... they have a "low risk" population? So wouldn't that mean they have a "high risk" population as well?

Author:	Vindicarre [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:
It's surprising what people will put other people through so they can feel "safe".

The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/

TSA the molester https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5975	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Lex Luthor [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:12 pm ]
Post subject:
Safety is staying away from motorized vehicles, which are the greatest cause of externally-caused death by far. Safety is not groping little children who obviously are not armed and dangerous.

Author:	Emer [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:35 pm ]
Post subject:
12 and younger, modified pat down. 13 and over? Full on pat down. I deliberately didn't use the word "frisk" because I've been frisked and I've been patted down at the airport and they are different. I should get more action from the TSA than some chick that I gave $50 to for a lap dance. I would love to see the publicity of a 8th grader getting the full on grope. The thing that really pisses me off is they the were denied a second screening and had to have the pat down. I was pretty sure it was either or?

Author:	darksiege [ Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:
after watching the "grope" video on the internet... I do not get it, where was this groping? The TSA agent was explaining the whole process, made sure that the parent had full visibility to everything that was being done, and I saw no groping. That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that, but to call it groping is a bit disingenuous.

Author:	Raltar [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:47 am ]
Post subject:
While I think it is a waste of time for the most part, you have to think that if kids get a free pass, they are ideal to bring along with you when you decide to hijack the plane. They aren't going to check the kid. Put your boxcutters and whatever else on them.

Author:	Jasmy [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: TSA the molester
They still get scanned...the grope...er, pat down, is just an extra check. I'm sorry but I think the entire process is a bunch of hogwash! I don't really need a bunch of inept assholes digging through my suitcase, putting my hair dryer, dress shoes, and curling iron into the same plastic bag as my liquids(which they weren't all in the same bag previously), as well as knocking the caps off of the liquids, so that they are all ruined and unusable when I reach my destination. Luckily my shoes survived for the wedding the next day, barely, but everything else had to be replaced.

Author:	Hannibal [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:33 am ]
Post subject:	Re:
darksiege wrote: after watching the "grope" video on the internet... I do not get it, where was this groping? The TSA agent was explaining the whole process, made sure that the parent had full visibility to everything that was being done, and I saw no groping. That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that, but to call it groping is a bit disingenuous. Yeah well I'm gonna save this post and rub it in your face when radicalized white toddlers start making our planes fall outta the sky you sympathizer!

Author:	Arathain Kelvar [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
Hannibal wrote: darksiege wrote: after watching the "grope" video on the internet... I do not get it, where was this groping? The TSA agent was explaining the whole process, made sure that the parent had full visibility to everything that was being done, and I saw no groping. That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that, but to call it groping is a bit disingenuous. Yeah well I'm gonna save this post and rub it in your face when radicalized white toddlers start making our planes fall outta the sky you sympathizer! On the other hand, do you really put it past some of these radicals to load a toddler up with weapons or a bomb? Anyway, TSA needs to DIAF.

Author:	darksiege [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
Hannibal wrote: Yeah well I'm gonna save this post and rub it in your face when radicalized white toddlers start making our planes fall outta the sky you sympathizer! I will likely be pissy at that time, but give just about as little a crap as I did about the video of the groping.

Author:	Vindicarre [ Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re:
darksiege wrote: That said: I still do not think it is necessary to give any child a full pat down like that... Yes, it was. The TSA needs to prove who is in charge, to the parents so they can continue their little charade for the time being; most importantly, to the child, so they can continue it indefinitely.

Author:	LadyKate [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:22 am ]
Post subject:
I remember reading news reports about babies wearing diapers stuffed with cocaine and other substances on planes. Its not much of a stretch to think that terrorists could put something on a child. If airlines were not patting down children, (I did not see any groping), and something catastrophic happened due to something a child had carried on board a plane, people would be outraged that it wasn't caught beforehand. You can't please everybody. In my mind, all the security precautions are annoying yes, and we like to gripe about them, but I'm glad they're there.

Author:	Diamondeye [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:
Cost-benefit analysis, that's why. The fact that we cannot take every conceiveable security step does not mean we should take none. I'm not advocating necessarily for current practices, but the argument that we should take no security because we don't take it to an illogical extreme, or that because it is not perfect it therefore should not be attempted at all is just silly.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Elmarnieh [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 am ]
Post subject:
Then you're free to go to an airline that has them. Why am I not free to choose one that does not?

Author:	LadyKate [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:47 am ]
Post subject:
Because when planes are hijacked, it doesn't just affect the lives of the people on board the plane. Your freedom to choose an airline that has a lower level screening process (or none) would also provide the means for a terrorist to bomb or otherwise destroy lives and people not even on the plane.

Author:	Elmarnieh [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re:
LadyKate wrote: Because when planes are hijacked, it doesn't just affect the lives of the people on board the plane. Your freedom to choose an airline that has a lower level screening process (or none) would also provide the means for a terrorist to bomb or otherwise destroy lives and people not even on the plane. So why don't we have screenings for renting trucks, purchasing fertilizer, driving on highways, or parking near buildings? In fact almost every time someone steps into public they should be screened because their actions could have an affect on the lives of others.

Author:	Hannibal [ Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Re:
Elmarnieh wrote: LadyKate wrote: Because when planes are hijacked, it doesn't just affect the lives of the people on board the plane. Your freedom to choose an airline that has a lower level screening process (or none) would also provide the means for a terrorist to bomb or otherwise destroy lives and people not even on the plane. So why don't we have screenings for renting trucks, purchasing fertilizer, driving on highways, or parking near buildings? In fact almost every time someone steps into public they should be screened because their actions could have an affect on the lives of others. Silly American pig-dogs keeping bleach and ammonia right next to buckets in their grocery store! Mwahahahahaha jihad!