The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:11 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: uh... what???
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:59 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebri ... tml?hpt=T2

Quote:
Los Angeles (CNN) -- Zsa Zsa Gabor's husband wants his 94-year-old wife to become a mother again using an egg donor, artificial insemination and a surrogate mother, Prince Frederic von Anhalt told CNN Thursday.

"I've gone through the initial steps of donor matching and blood work and next week the donation process will begin," von Anhalt said.

Gabor's only child, Francesca Hilton, described herself as shocked when told of the plan Thursday.

"That's just weird," Hilton said.

Von Anhalt, 67, said he is working with Dr. Mark Surry of the Southern California Reproductive Center in Beverly Hills. CNN calls to the center have not been returned.

CNN Health: Relax! It won't happen

Gabor has suffered major health problems in the last year, including hip replacement surgery and a leg amputation. She has been unable to walk since a 2002 car accident.

"I'm a retired guy," von Anhalt said. "I can take care of it."

Gabor talked about adding a new baby to the family when they got married 25 years ago, and she brought the topic up again in recent months, he said.

One reason is their desire to have someone carry on the famous Gabor name. None of her two sisters left an heir and her only child does not use the Gabor name, von Anhalt said.

Francesca Hilton, 64, is Gabor's only child, the product of her second marriage to hotel magnate Conrad Hilton.

She told CNN that her full name is Constance Francesca Gabor Hilton.

The process, which includes finding an egg donor and a surrogate mother to give birth to the baby, will cost about $100,000, von Anhalt estimated.

The prince, who acquired his royal title when he was adopted as an adult by a German woman, is Gabor's ninth husband.

He has complained in recent months about financial burdens caused by his wife's hospitalizations. While he put their Bel Air, California mansion up for sale earlier this year, he said he is not actively marketing it.

"In life you need something to live for," he said. "If my wife passes away before me, I have nothing to live for."

The Hungarian-born actress, the second of the three celebrated Gabor sisters, is famous for her many marriages and strong personality as well as her acting prowess.

Her more prominent films include John Huston's Toulouse-Lautrec biopic, "Moulin Rouge," in 1952, "The Story of Three Loves" in 1953, "The Girl in the Kremlin" in 1957, and Orson Welles' 1958 cult classic, "Touch of Evil."


Setting aside the pure stupidity of this all, why the hell would she be considered the mother of this theoretical child in any way shape or form? It wouldn't be her egg. It wouldn't be her carrying it. I'm trying to figure out why she wouldn't just adopt?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
lol why is this in hellfire?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:42 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
She would be responsible for the creation of the child (funding and arranging it) and Prince Fred would get to keep what remains of her fortune and raise the child with it instead of letting it all go to her daughter.

It is all about the money.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: uh... what???
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:15 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
/raise hand

What if the spiders in her vag reject the baby? Those cobwebs are coming from something and I doubt its silkworms.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: uh... what???
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:20 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Midgen wrote:
lol why is this in hellfire?


To answer you I give you...

Hopwin wrote:
/raise hand

What if the spiders in her vag reject the baby? Those cobwebs are coming from something and I doubt its silkworms.


And say, it will only go downhill from here. ;)

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: uh... what???
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:09 am 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
I'm sure they'll inject parts of her DNA into the egg before putting it into the surrogate... Thus technically it will be her and.. the dude's child


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:05 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
There should be an age cutoff for anyone attempting to have children. I understand women in their 60s have broken some world records here and I think it's appalling. Imho, *EDIT* Anyone over the age of 45 should not be allowed to have children should seriously consider the consequences and repurcussions of having children so late in life. It is unfair to the child to grow up with parents that are too old to play with him/her and participate in other activities with the child, too big of a gap to relate to the child, too old to have the energy required to maintain discipline, and there is the probablility that the parents might not live to see the child graduate high school. Again, not fair to the kid.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Last edited by LadyKate on Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: uh... what???
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
LadyKate wrote:
There should be an age cutoff for anyone attempting to have children. I understand women in their 60s have broken some world records here and I think it's appalling. Imho, Anyone over the age of 45 should not be allowed to have children. It is unfair to the child to grow up with parents that are too old to play with him/her and participate in other activities with the child, too big of a gap to relate to the child, too old to have the energy required to maintain discipline, and there is the probablility that the parents might not live to see the child graduate high school. Again, not fair to the kid.

How do you think your suggestion should be enforced, LK?

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:32 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Oh no you don't. I'm not falling for that one, Taskiss! ;)
My term "should be" is merely my opinion, a suggestion, and in no way meant to be a cry for a law or some other method to stop people from having children against their will.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
In that case I'd suggest changing the part where you say "should not be allowed to", since that pretty much means stopped against their will.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
LadyKate wrote:
in no way meant to be a cry for a law or some other method to stop people from having children against their will.

So, you're in favor of people having children against their will?

/duck

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:43 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Their money, their genetic material, their time = none of my business.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:44 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Oh for Pete's sake ya'll! Hahaha, sometimes I swear you guys are more out for the argument itself and the vernacular and such used and the actual topic is merely a vehicle for the debate.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:14 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
LadyKate wrote:
Oh for Pete's sake ya'll! Hahaha, sometimes I swear you guys are more out for the argument itself and the vernacular and such used and the actual topic is merely a vehicle for the debate.

/bonk
Oh hai, welcome to the Ranger's Glade!

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
LadyKate wrote:
Oh for Pete's sake ya'll! Hahaha, sometimes I swear you guys are more out for the argument itself and the vernacular and such used and the actual topic is merely a vehicle for the debate.

I was nice about it though, wasn't I? You've never busted my chops, so I'll never bust yours, LK.

:quote: nice :quote: being a relative term, of course. :lol:

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Hopwin wrote:
LadyKate wrote:
Oh for Pete's sake ya'll! Hahaha, sometimes I swear you guys are more out for the argument itself and the vernacular and such used and the actual topic is merely a vehicle for the debate.

/bonk
Oh hai, welcome to the Ranger's Glade!


Yeah, no kidding. You've posted here how long? ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:09 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Hahahaha, yeah I know, right? :P

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group