The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Did Bin Laden really do it? https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6131 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | LadyKate [ Mon May 02, 2011 6:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Did Bin Laden really do it? |
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212851/Has-Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-seven-years--U-S-Britain-covering-continue-war-terror.html I know this is an old article, but it's new to me. Here is a segment of it: Quote: This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?
Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. The author insists that the many Bin Laden tapes made since that date have been concocted by the West to make the world believe Bin Laden is alive. The purpose? To stoke up waning support for the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan. To understand Griffin's thesis, we must remember the West's reaction to 9/11, that fateful sunny September day in 2001. Within a month, on Sunday, October 7, the U.S. and Britain launched massive retaliatory air strikes in the Tora Bora region where they said 'prime suspect' Bin Laden was living 'as a guest of Afghanistan'. This military offensive ignored the fact that Bin Laden had already insisted four times in official Al Qaeda statements made to the Arab press that he played no role in 9/11. Indeed, on the fourth occasion, on September 28 and a fortnight after the atrocity, he declared emphatically: 'I have already said I am not involved. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge... nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act.' Within hours of the October 7 strikes by the U.S. on Tora Bora, Bin Laden made his first ever appearance on video tape. Dressed in Army fatigues, and with an Islamic head-dress, he had an assault rifle propped behind him in a broadly lit mountain hideout. Significantly, he looked pale and gaunt. Although he called President George W. Bush 'head of the infidels' and poured scorn on the U.S., he once again rejected responsibility for 9/11. 'America was hit by God in one of its softest spots. America is full of fear, from its north to its south, from its west to its east. Thank God for that.' Then came a second videotape on November 3, 2001. Once again, an ailing Bin Laden lashed out at the United States. He urged true Muslims to celebrate the attacks - but did not at any time acknowledge he had been involved in the atrocity. And then there was silence until December 13, 2001 - the date Griffin claims Bin Laden died. That very day, the U.S. Government released a new video of the terror chief. In this tape, Bin Laden contradicted all his previous denials, and suddenly admitted to his involvement in the atrocity of 9/11. The tape had reportedly been found by U.S. troops in a private home in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, after anti-Taliban forces took over the city. A label attached to it claimed that it had been made on November 9, 2001. Bush made Bin Laden's capture a national priority, claiming he could get his man - dead or alive The tape shows Bin Laden talking with a visiting sheik. In it, he clearly states that he not only knew about the 9/11 atrocities in advance, but had planned every detail personally. What manna for the Western authorities! This put the terrorist back in the frame over 9/11. The Washington Post quoted U.S. officials saying that the video 'offers the most convincing evidence of a connection between Bin Laden and the September 11 attacks'. A euphoric President Bush added: 'For those who see this tape, they realise that not only is he guilty of incredible murder, but he has no conscience and no soul.' In London, Downing Street said that the video was 'conclusive proof of his involvement'. The then Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, added: 'There is no doubt it is the real thing. People can see Bin Laden there, making those utterly chilling words of admission about his guilt for organising the atrocities of September 11.' Yet Professor Griffin claims this 'confessional' video provokes more questions than answers. For a start, the Bin Laden in this vital film testimony looks different. He is a weighty man with a black beard, not a grey one. His pale skin had suddenly become darker, and he had a different shaped nose. His artistic hands with slender fingers had transformed into those of a pugilist. He looked in exceedingly good health. Furthermore, Bin Laden can be seen writing a note with his right hand, although he is left-handed. Bizarrely, too, he makes statements about 9/11 which Griffin claims would never have come from the mouth of the real Bin Laden - a man with a civil engineering degree who had made his fortune (before moving into terrorism) from building construction in the Middle East. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1LC8LzFOG Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1LC7uSGjD |
Author: | Talya [ Mon May 02, 2011 6:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The basic problem with conspiracy theories in general, is they greatly overestimate the competence of government. Anyway, Bin Laden didn't really "do it." Bin Laden led a terrorist organization that "did it." He did it to the same extent that Obama caught Bin Laden. This doesn't make him any less culpable. As for the rest of that post, it seems to cherrypick the most convenient facts for its premise, and ignore the rest and utterly fabricate others. As usual, Wiki has a pretty comprehensive list. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibi ... _bin_Laden |
Author: | LadyKate [ Mon May 02, 2011 6:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Talya wrote: The basic problem with conspiracy theories is they greatly overestimate the competence of government. Hah, yeah, but its hard to refute the statements that Bin Laden denied playing a part in 9/11 several times, and then the reports that he was on dialysis and died in December of 2001...explain that? |
Author: | Talya [ Mon May 02, 2011 7:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
LadyKate wrote: Talya wrote: The basic problem with conspiracy theories is they greatly overestimate the competence of government. Hah, yeah, but its hard to refute the statements that Bin Laden denied playing a part in 9/11 several times, and then the reports that he was on dialysis and died in December of 2001...explain that? Far fewer in number and less reputable than the evidence that he was still alive? Everyone knows i was the first to criticize Shrub at any opportunity. But this ranks up there with the "9-11 truthers" for credibility. Besides, if it were true, Julian Assange or some other whistleblower would probably have already shown the entire world. Stuff like this doesn't stay rumor if it's true. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon May 02, 2011 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Bin Laden initially said he was not involved. Subsequently, videos were obtained where he discussed the planning, and how many casualties were expected. This was in Dec. 2001. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon May 02, 2011 10:24 am ] |
Post subject: | |
And it's not like those attacks were his first Rodeo or are anything either. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |