The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6299 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Müs [ Tue May 17, 2011 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Quote: FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker announced May 11 her decision to leave the agency to take a position as senior vice president of government affairs at Comcast/NBCU. According to a statement on the FCC website, Baker notified President Barack Obama in a letter sent the same day of her decision. Baker, whose term as a commissioner began in July 2009, originally announced her intention to leave the agency June 3, but subsequently said she would leave “as soon as I am able to ensure an orderly wind down of my office.” Baker has served as a commissioner while the FCC has pursued the vision laid out in its National Broadband Plan, which includes a variety of steps aimed at recouping 120MHz of TV spectrum to meet future wireless broadband Internet demand. At the 2011 NAB Show, Baker expressed the wish that the commission would have begun its spectrum overhaul with satellite spectrum. “That might have been an easier proof of concept,” she said during an NAB Show session. In announcing her decision to leave the FCC, Baker said she was “most proud of our collective efforts to focus on long-term comprehensive spectrum reform.” Of the five commissioners currently heading the agency, Baker perhaps has been most willing to consider the possibility of transitioning TV broadcasting to newer compression and more efficient modulation technologies as part of the strategy to meet the nation’s wireless capacity needs. Before casting her December 2010 vote for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to revamp existing TV spectrum regulations, Baker said future discussions should include “the possibility of a transition from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4, the adoption of a more cellularized broadcast system or a transition from ATSC to OFDM technologies.” Another important proceeding during Baker’s tenure as a commissioner was approval in January of the Comcast-NBCU deal. Two days after announcing her decision to leave the commission, Baker issued a statement on the FCC website saying no one from Comcast or NBCU ever approached her about possible employment. When the position became available, Baker “immediately sought counsel from the general counsel of the FCC” and recused herself on April 18 “from any matters involving Comcast or NBCUniversal,” the statement said. “I have not only complied with the legal and ethical laws, but I also have gone further. I have not participated or voted any item, not just those related to Comcast or NBCUniversal, since entering discussions about an offer of potential employment,” she said in the statement. Baker won praise from NAB CEO and President Gordon Smith. "With a winning combination of integrity, intellect and experience, Meredith Baker will be a key player for NBCUniversal, and I know that her in-depth knowledge of broadcast issues, deep understanding of the D.C. landscape and strong leadership abilities will make her an important resource for the entire broadcast industry," said Smith in a statement posted on the association’s website. Julius Genachowski, chairman of the FCC, likewise praised Baker. “Meredith’s wonderful spirit, broad experience and deep policy acumen have made the FCC a more effective agency. She’s made our decisions smarter and our policies better,” he said. /sigh. Of course she's lying. |
Author: | darksiege [ Tue May 17, 2011 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Can't we set her on fire? Unfortunately we think we are better than that. Now we have to live with a potential monopoly created as a result of this. Truthfully, this does not come as a surprise. |
Author: | Müs [ Tue May 17, 2011 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
No, cause then she'd be a martyr. Jail is a better place for people that can't understand normal thinking. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Tue May 17, 2011 11:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
She's probably very qualified for her new job... not that anyone cares. Of course anyone is preferable to some evil, horrible person who worked for the draconian U.S. government. All they want to do is take our money and rights. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Tue May 17, 2011 11:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, that, and to parlay working for the government into a high paying position in a private corporation. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed May 18, 2011 12:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Lex Luthor wrote: She's probably very qualified for her new job... not that anyone cares. Of course anyone is preferable to some evil, horrible person who worked for the draconian U.S. government. All they want to do is take our money and rights. You honestly don't see the conflict of interest here? |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed May 18, 2011 12:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: Lex Luthor wrote: She's probably very qualified for her new job... not that anyone cares. Of course anyone is preferable to some evil, horrible person who worked for the draconian U.S. government. All they want to do is take our money and rights. You honestly don't see the conflict of interest here? I think it could actually be better, because she could help Comcast to advance its services and infrastructure faster. If the government and Comcast are at odds then it's bad for everybody. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed May 18, 2011 12:51 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Your naivety is astounding. NBC Universal bought Comcast. I seriously doubt they're going to advance anything but prices. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed May 18, 2011 12:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Müs wrote: Your naivety is astounding. NBC Universal bought Comcast. I seriously doubt they're going to advance anything but prices. I thought it was the other way around with Comcast buying NBC. Also Comcast has already advanced large areas of connectivity a great deal. They don't just sit around and count bills. |
Author: | Midgen [ Wed May 18, 2011 2:12 am ] |
Post subject: | |
O M G . . . |
Author: | Aizle [ Wed May 18, 2011 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Müs wrote: /sigh. Of course she's lying. How do you know that? |
Author: | Rynar [ Wed May 18, 2011 9:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Aizle wrote: Müs wrote: /sigh. Of course she's lying. How do you know that? Because she is talking. |
Author: | Aizle [ Wed May 18, 2011 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Rynar wrote: Aizle wrote: Müs wrote: /sigh. Of course she's lying. How do you know that? Because she is talking. I know I shouldn't be surprised by stuff like this anymore, but I am continually surprised by just how blindly some people here hate anything or anyone who has any ties to the government. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Wed May 18, 2011 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Agreed Aizle. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Wed May 18, 2011 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So, what, if you work for the government you can never work in the private sector again? Or only if you change careers? Give me a break. It's a hard topic, to be sure, but there are rules, and people generally do their best to follow them. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Wed May 18, 2011 12:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm sure that's true Ara, but this seems pretty blatant. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed May 18, 2011 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Vindicarre wrote: I'm sure that's true Ara, but this seems pretty blatant. What seems blatant to me is that someone with a lot of experience in this area is getting a new job in the same area. It's better, I think, for people to work where they are experienced. I wouldn't want a dentist to construct my house, and so on. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu May 19, 2011 6:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Aizle wrote: Müs wrote: /sigh. Of course she's lying. How do you know that? Someone that had a big part in the regulatory part of a merger of two billion dollar companies gets a Senior VP job (as a government lobbyist) in said merged company in a rather short amount of time after the merger goes through. Total conflict of interest. She's lying. There's too much to be a coincidence here. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu May 19, 2011 6:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Arathain Kelvar wrote: So, what, if you work for the government you can never work in the private sector again? Or only if you change careers? Give me a break. It's a hard topic, to be sure, but there are rules, and people generally do their best to follow them. It is to laugh. Rules are only for those that don't have the ability to avoid them. Y'know, the regular people. Not the Nouveau Ruling Class we seem to have in this country. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Thu May 19, 2011 7:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: Arathain Kelvar wrote: So, what, if you work for the government you can never work in the private sector again? Or only if you change careers? Give me a break. It's a hard topic, to be sure, but there are rules, and people generally do their best to follow them. It is to laugh. Rules are only for those that don't have the ability to avoid them. Y'know, the regular people. Not the Nouveau Ruling Class we seem to have in this country. So given the chance to break the law with impunity you would do so? |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Thu May 19, 2011 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mergers, Lobbyists and Conflicts of Interest. |
Müs wrote: Aizle wrote: Müs wrote: /sigh. Of course she's lying. How do you know that? Someone that had a big part in the regulatory part of a merger of two billion dollar companies gets a Senior VP job (as a government lobbyist) in said merged company in a rather short amount of time after the merger goes through. Total conflict of interest. She's lying. There's too much to be a coincidence here. Except she witheld her vote on some of those items. Believe what you want, man, I believe in innocence until proof otherwise. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu May 19, 2011 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
She withheld her vote for the last month. That was *after* approving the merger, though. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu May 19, 2011 11:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Hopwin wrote: Müs wrote: Arathain Kelvar wrote: So, what, if you work for the government you can never work in the private sector again? Or only if you change careers? Give me a break. It's a hard topic, to be sure, but there are rules, and people generally do their best to follow them. It is to laugh. Rules are only for those that don't have the ability to avoid them. Y'know, the regular people. Not the Nouveau Ruling Class we seem to have in this country. So given the chance to break the law with impunity you would do so? Depends on the law. I wouldn't go right the **** out and start raping and murdering people. But things that don't actually hurt anyone, maybe. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu May 19, 2011 11:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: She withheld her vote for the last month. That was *after* approving the merger, though. This. The damage had already been done, and she could afford to look innocent. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |