The Glade 4.0
https://gladerebooted.net/

Presidential Tweeting...
https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6831
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Rynar [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:43 am ]
Post subject:  Presidential Tweeting...

What. The. ****.

Seriously?

Author:  Lex Luthor [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:18 am ]
Post subject: 

This isn't new. Obama has been tweeting since his 2008 campaign.

Author:  Midgen [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:34 am ]
Post subject: 

Not like this.

Something like 130 tweets in the hours leading up the house vote, pleading with people to spam their Republican congresscritter twitter accounts (links provided) begging them not to vote for Boehner's bill...

When news got out that nearly 40,000 of his followers (who presumably got pissed at the spam) bailed on him, the tweets suddenly stopped.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

Here is his feed if you want to see the carnage...

It's technically not him. It's run by his re-election campaign staff... When he personally sends a tweet, he ends with '-BO'

http://twitter.com/#!/BarackObama

Twitter.com/BarackObama wrote:
Barack Obama
@BarackObama Washington, DC
This account is run by #Obama2012 campaign staff. Tweets from the President are signed -BO.
http://www.barackobama.com

Author:  Midgen [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:53 am ]
Post subject: 

Reading Twitters Rules, it looks like they may be guilty of breaking one or two...

http://support.twitter.com/groups/33-re ... tter-rules
Twitter Rules wrote:
Spam: You may not use the Twitter service for the purpose of spamming anyone. What constitutes “spamming” will evolve as we respond to new tricks and tactics by spammers. Some of the factors that we take into account when determining what conduct is considered to be spamming are:
If you have followed a large amount of users in a short amount of time;
If you have followed and unfollowed people in a short time period, particularly by automated means (aggressive follower churn);
If you repeatedly follow and unfollow people, whether to build followers or to garner more attention for your profile;
If you have a small number of followers compared to the amount of people you are following;
If your updates consist mainly of links, and not personal updates;
If you post misleading links;
If a large number of people are blocking you;
The number of spam complaints that have been filed against you;
If you post duplicate content over multiple accounts or multiple duplicate updates on one account;
If you post multiple unrelated updates to a topic using #;
If you post multiple unrelated updates to a trending or popular topic;
If you send large numbers of duplicate @replies or mentions;
If you send large numbers of unsolicited @replies or mentions in an attempt to spam a service or link;
If you add a large number of unrelated users to lists in an attempt to spam a service or link;
If you repeatedly post other users' Tweets as your own;
If you have attempted to "sell" followers, particularly through tactics considered aggressive following or follower churn;
Creating or purchasing accounts in order to gain followers;
Using or promoting third-party sites that claim to get you more followers (such as follower trains, sites promising "more followers fast," or any other site that offers to automatically add followers to your account);
If you create false or misleading Points of Interest;
If you create Points of Interest to namesquat or spam.

Author:  Hannibal [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:00 am ]
Post subject: 

He is petulant and narcissistic. Why not annoying too?

Author:  Lex Luthor [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Presidential Tweeting...

Wow, he (or rather his staff) is posting ridiculously much, to the level that it's spam. I apologize for my short-sighted reply.

Author:  Dash [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:43 am ]
Post subject: 

I saw a CNN Headline News tracker the other day informing me that the White House "rickrolled" it's readers on twitter. Seriously.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/2 ... 11345.html

Author:  Müs [ Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Dash wrote:
I saw a CNN Headline News tracker the other day informing me that the White House "rickrolled" it's readers on twitter. Seriously.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/2 ... 11345.html


Its good to see that they're using their time wisely.

Author:  Jasmy [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Presidential Tweeting...

Oh, yeah...like we don't have anything bigger to worry about!!

My hubby has paid into Social Security since he was 16...he got his first check this month and it's probably his last unless our Congress can pull their heads out of their asses!! If only he could get all of his "donations" to SS back instead.

(We are screwed!!!)

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:10 am ]
Post subject: 

See, this isn't a big deal, and is kind of funny actually, under normal circumstances. The problem is, if you're going to have a bit of fun at work, you NEED TO GET YOUR **** DONE FIRST.

Author:  Hannibal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

I see this as a wonderful chance to privatize social security. All the people who are scared of not getting checks should be motivated to hold that money themselves so the irresponsible government doesn't squander it on things that they don't agree with.

Author:  Xequecal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Presidential Tweeting...

Privatizing Social Security defeats the point of Social Security. You might as well just get rid of it.

Author:  Hannibal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Presidential Tweeting...

Xequecal wrote:
Privatizing Social Security defeats the point of Social Security. You might as well just get rid of it.


Excellent point. I agree. Scrap the program and refund the money.

Author:  Midgen [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hey that's an idea I can get behind,considering I've paid into it my entire adult life and will never see a penny of it.

Author:  Rorinthas [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:43 am ]
Post subject:  Presidential Tweeting...

We can't refund what we don't have though. So if we got rid of SS it would probably be a screw you, at least you don't have to pay us anymore kind of thing. Unless maybe you phase it out slowly.

Author:  Midgen [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:25 am ]
Post subject: 

Maybe Alaska would help us out?

Author:  Vindicarre [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:09 am ]
Post subject: 

There was/is next to zero chance that the checks for SSI/Medi/etc. won't go out, and even less chance of a default on the debt; too many people bit hard on Barry's dire pronouncements.

The real worry was, and still is, the credit rating. It looks like this deal's cuts are hundreds of billions short of what would make the ratings agencies happy. Rynar has the right of it:
Rynar wrote:
The debt rating agencies aren't impressed. We're still very likely to be downgraded, and rightly so.

Author:  Corolinth [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:31 am ]
Post subject: 

Being downgraded is good for us. We'll never stop borrowing money and raising our debt ceiling until people stop loaning us money.

Author:  Taskiss [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

Corolinth wrote:
Being downgraded is good for us. We'll never stop borrowing money and raising our debt ceiling until people stop loaning us money.

Pretty much the way I see it too.

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yes, I agree, but ouch.

Author:  Rynar [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Taskiss wrote:
Corolinth wrote:
Being downgraded is good for us. We'll never stop borrowing money and raising our debt ceiling until people stop loaning us money.

Pretty much the way I see it too.


You are missing the true impact of this.

The downgrade of US debt will mandate an absolute flight from US treasuries. Mutual Funds and Retirement Accounts which are made up of only AAA rated entities are going to be forced into a sell-off immediately, precipitating the crash of the bond market.

Author:  Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Rynar wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
Corolinth wrote:
Being downgraded is good for us. We'll never stop borrowing money and raising our debt ceiling until people stop loaning us money.

Pretty much the way I see it too.


You are missing the true impact of this.

The downgrade of US debt will mandate an absolute flight from US treasuries. Mutual Funds and Retirement Accounts which are made up of only AAA rated entities are going to be forced into a sell-off immediately, precipitating the crash of the bond market.


Not if they are still the most attractive investment. In other words, if they all suck, but the US Treasury just sucks less....

Author:  Taskiss [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

The only thing the US AAA rating does is support the status quo.

If change is desired, you have to disrupt the status quo, right?

Author:  Rynar [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Rynar wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
Pretty much the way I see it too.


You are missing the true impact of this.

The downgrade of US debt will mandate an absolute flight from US treasuries. Mutual Funds and Retirement Accounts which are made up of only AAA rated entities are going to be forced into a sell-off immediately, precipitating the crash of the bond market.


Not if they are still the most attractive investment. In other words, if they all suck, but the US Treasury just sucks less....


Incorrect. They are legally obligated to contain only AAA rated debt instruments.

Author:  Rynar [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

Taskiss wrote:
The only thing the US AAA rating does is support the status quo.

If change is desired, you have to disrupt the status quo, right?


As long as you are emotionally prepared to watch those around you suffer immensely, and to live without many to most goods and services you have become accustomed to.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/