The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
US leaders reach a deal ... finally https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6840 |
Page 1 of 9 |
Author: | Lydiaa [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | US leaders reach a deal ... finally |
Am I the only one to find that silly? Quote: Social Security, Medicaid and food stamps would be exempt from the automatic cuts, but payments to doctors, nursing homes and other Medicare providers could be trimmed, as could subsidies to insurance companies that offer an alternative to government-run Medicare. Spoiler: Anyways, gratz on getting out of this tight bind. At least for a little bit |
Author: | Micheal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not over yet, they still have to vote on it. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah cutting payments to doctors who already want to cut Medicare patients due to low payments. GG Republicans. GG. |
Author: | Midgen [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Oh the drama... Was anyone really surprised at how this went down? Did anyone serious think that the country would default? |
Author: | Rynar [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The debt rating agencies aren't impressed. We're still very likely to be downgraded, and rightly so. |
Author: | Midgen [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
"Winners and Losers" per the Washington Post.. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html |
Author: | Micheal [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Really, this whole fiasco feels like someone wrote a script for a really cheesy movie and the real politicians followed it instead. |
Author: | Rynar [ Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Midgen wrote: "Winners and Losers" per the Washington Post.. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html We all lost, Midgen. We all lost. |
Author: | Midgen [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
That was kind of my thought too... |
Author: | Midgen [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:10 am ] |
Post subject: | |
haha.. love this picture (saw it on the front page of drudgereport.com)... |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:30 am ] |
Post subject: | US leaders reach a deal ... finally |
Game over man Game over. It's time to join the muppet revolution. Unless there is some kind of miracle. Funny thing though, I doubt this is really gonna get done in 48 hours thus proving the world wouldn't have ended on tuesday. Not that anyone is gonna point that out. I hoped it wouldn't. I really really hoped it wouldnt. Now we are all royally screwed. |
Author: | Stathol [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: US leaders reach a deal ... finally |
This whole affair has been the greatest example of "shoot the messenger" that I think I've ever personally seen in American politics. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: US leaders reach a deal ... finally |
Stathol wrote: This whole affair has been the greatest example of "shoot the messenger" that I think I've ever personally seen in American politics. In what respect? |
Author: | Dash [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I dont hate this deal, at least as I understand it... FLAME AWAY! Honestly though I see it as a minor win, something that can be built upon. |
Author: | FarSky [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The most salient take on the "argument," as always, from Comedy Central: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colber ... g-of-power |
Author: | Taskiss [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Dash wrote: I dont hate this deal, at least as I understand it... FLAME AWAY! Honestly though I see it as a minor win, something that can be built upon. Yeah, as I understand it, there are no plans to increase taxes as part of this agreement. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It allows Obama to spend after he's been reelected thus showing what's truly important to him. Unfortunately no one will likely pick up on that. Also cuts are starting at 2013 and over ten years with really little accountability. It's a business as usual deal. |
Author: | Dash [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
No tax increase, incremental cuts. Incremental is how they do it with entitlements, and now the discussion has shifted to "what can we cut" instead of how much more can we spend. That's the upside, downside is we're still adding trillions to the debt. Best line I've read on this so far is: http://reason.com/blog/2011/08/01/the-d ... ate-is-dea "I'm just hoping whatever Krugman is smoking is covered under Obamacare." |
Author: | Hannibal [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: It allows Obama to spend after he's been reelected thus showing what's truly important to him. Unfortunately no one will likely pick up on that. Also cuts are starting at 2013 and over ten years with really little accountability. It's a business as usual deal. Since the next Congress is not bound by the agreements of the previous, any cuts that are to take place after this term should be counted in the "never going to freaking happen" |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
pretty much |
Author: | Wwen [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
FarSky wrote: The most salient take on the "argument," as always, from Comedy Central: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colber ... g-of-power "Nancy Pelosi is the cave troll. " "This has nothing to do with the debt crisis, I just want to remind you that I have this." |
Author: | Müs [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: It allows Obama to spend after he's been reelected thus showing what's truly important to him. Unfortunately no one will likely pick up on that. Also cuts are starting at 2013 and over ten years with really little accountability. It's a business as usual deal. You're presuming he'll be reelected. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: Rorinthas wrote: It allows Obama to spend after he's been reelected thus showing what's truly important to him. Unfortunately no one will likely pick up on that. Also cuts are starting at 2013 and over ten years with really little accountability. It's a business as usual deal. You're presuming he'll be reelected. I think he will be just so white guilt can be assuaged. Then maybe we can one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. |
Author: | Aizle [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I for one voted for him based on the content of his character. And will do so again. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Aizle wrote: I for one voted for him based on the content of his character. And will do so again. I don't think the content of his character was released until recently. Up until then it was the invented, media friendly Obama. Now he has to run on his record rather then from the comfort of voting "present". |
Page 1 of 9 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |