The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Why the FCC needs to die https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6889 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Why the FCC needs to die |
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/ ... s-doctrine Quote: Though much of the discussion about a possible fairness doctrine for broadcasters went away when Republicans took over the House of Representatives in 2010, one Federal Communications Commissioner says there still could be an effort at finding a back door to the rules. Commissioner Robert McDowell told Chris Stirewalt on Monday's Power Play Live that localism, a proposal that gives the federal government the ability to make sure broadcasters serve their communities, could also be used to wedge in principles of the fairness doctrine. "The government would be compiling data as to what kind of content you were airing and whether the government thought that was appropriate content," McDowell said. "It could be political speech, it could be shows on baking or gardening. But we don't know where the government is headed." It is up to the Federal Government to regulate to make sure it represents the local community, be it political speech or a gardening show...not sure ow many ways I can say **** the FCC, damn them to hell you over reaching nanny state ****. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'll take the FCC over my ISP deciding that every website except Google is getting a surcharge to access, and I can't do anything about it because they own the infrastructure and noone can compete with them. |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why the FCC needs to die |
I never understood this, no one can compete or beat this monopoly! Be afraid be afraid of the free market! |
Author: | Xequecal [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
No, noone can. Unless you're suggesting a second company build an entirely seperate infrastructure in order to compete with them, which is one of the biggest waste of resources I can imagine as now you have one completely superfluous fiber network that will never be used. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Social change by removal of choice. Typical move. Give them only the choices that you want them to have. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Hannibal wrote: Social change by removal of choice. Typical move. Give them only the choices that you want them to have. Do you think that building a second fiber network that ensures either one will not be used, or both will be used at an average 50% capacity each, is a good idea? |
Author: | Hannibal [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Xequecal wrote: Hannibal wrote: Social change by removal of choice. Typical move. Give them only the choices that you want them to have. Do you think that building a second fiber network that ensures either one will not be used, or both will be used at an average 50% capacity each, is a good idea? Many companies overbuild each other. In the case of some, they "rent" time on fiber backbones, satellites and HFC architecture. And oddly enough, they do this without the goverment telling them that they need to "play nice" with each other. I always equate more gov regulation with the Everquest play nice policy. On Mith Marr, that policy was supposed to even things out for the smaller guilds, but instead it was used as a weapon by the guilds who had already conquered the content. Same with these regulations. The idea (which I feel is a false premise to begin with) is to give people a shot to hear each side of the story. Instead it will be used as a bludegon against station owners to carry content that wouldn't be carried normally because it isn't what people want to hear. Or at the very least, not what people who listen to say AM talk raido wanto to hear. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:24 am ] |
Post subject: | |
This is hardly an FCC problem as much as it is "size and scope" of the executive branch problem. I think we need an FCC to administer the very limited resource of the broadcast spectrum. I don't think whoever has the biggest tower should win. However once they've given out their resources they should keep their noses out of it. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |