The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Solyndra https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7101 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Nitefox [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Solyndra |
Anyone keeping up with this? Basics from what I know...Solyndra is some huge green company that Obama supported, visted, gave his blessing(hahahahah!!!!) and all that...500million in taxpayer money used on the company...company just filed for bankrupcey a year after Obama did his thing(kiss of death). Seems Obama and the WH were very close buddy with this company(lot's of visits to the WH from the big wigs of the company). Anyway, seems things have really broken because the FBI just raided the company. http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18851389 |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | |
There's something seriously funky up with that link. First time I clicked on it, it tried to send me to "https://secure.www.gladerebooted.org/...". Then I tried to open in a new tab, and it sent me to what looked like a redirector of some sort. But if I copy the link address, and paste it, it works fine. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I heard about this. There are several places that Obama has visited that went under within a year. In all fairness, I have no idea if they are inordinate compared to other Presidents/candidates. |
Author: | Nitefox [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/solyndra- ... d=14434588 |
Author: | TheRiov [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not totally sure why this is that much news. I thought it was generally accepted that 'green' companies and innovation were considered high risk investments and that the reason the gov't was investing in them was that despite the 'big picture' reduction in pollution or other environmental benifits, it really isn't a sound business investment. If the market wont invest, then the gov't must. (so the theory goes) --if you're an adherent of that theory, you expect that some investments will tank. |
Author: | Kairtane [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
TheRiov wrote: Not totally sure why this is that much news. I thought it was generally accepted that 'green' companies and innovation were considered high risk investments and that the reason the gov't was investing in them was that despite the 'big picture' reduction in pollution or other environmental benifits, it really isn't a sound business investment. If the market wont invest, then the gov't must. (so the theory goes) --if you're an adherent of that theory, you expect that some investments will tank. You answered your own question. It's a big story because it wasn't a sound business investment, hence the market's reluctance to invest. Now 500 million in taxpayer's money is gone. Go, go government |
Author: | Taskiss [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Kairtane wrote: It's a big story because it wasn't a sound business investment, hence the market's reluctance to invest. Now 500 million in taxpayer's money is gone. Go, go government Then there's the FBI knocking on the door, so I'm thinking it's more than your usual unsound business practices afoot. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
TheRiov wrote: Not totally sure why this is that much news. I thought it was generally accepted that 'green' companies and innovation were considered high risk investments and that the reason the gov't was investing in them was that despite the 'big picture' reduction in pollution or other environmental benifits, it really isn't a sound business investment. If the market wont invest, then the gov't must. (so the theory goes) --if you're an adherent of that theory, you expect that some investments will tank. You don't think it's news when a company, closely connected to the administraion, that received 500 million dollars, is raided by the FBI? |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Only if it is connected to dirty republicans. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:06 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm gonna tinfoil hat it and say that this is going to go the way of Whitewater and documents are being destroyed right now to cover certain asses. |
Author: | Müs [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Uncle Fester wrote: dirty republicans. This is redundant. |
Author: | Nitefox [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/obama-off ... d=14476848 |
Author: | Stathol [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Solyndra sounds like an EQ ranger name. That is all. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
I was thinking it sounded more like a boss mob that drops caster loot. |
Author: | Nitefox [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Update on the Failure-In-Chief http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/emails-ob ... d=14508865 Quote: internal emails uncovered by investigators for the House Energy and Commerce Committee that were shared exclusively with ABC News show the Obama administration was keenly monitoring the progress of the loan, even as analysts were voicing serious concerns about the risk involved. "This deal is NOT ready for prime time," one White House budget analyst wrote in a March 10, 2009 email, nine days before the administration formally announced the loan.
|
Author: | RangerDave [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Diamondeye wrote: I was thinking it sounded more like a boss mob that drops caster loot. "Solyndra" sounds to me like the evil corporation trying to kill the hero in some dystopian sci-fi movie. |
Author: | FarSky [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
"Solyndra Green is people...'s money!" |
Author: | Rynar [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
FarSky wrote: "Solyndra Green is people...'s money!" Brilliant! |
Author: | Nitefox [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer. ... h-solyndra When in doubt...blame Bush! |
Author: | darksiege [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
what a **** slimebag, scumsucking douchebag. |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Even the palace guards like Stewart are chiming in http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmno ... ore-515332 |
Author: | Nitefox [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Solyndra |
Good Lord I can't keep with the updates for this story. http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_pol ... r_company/ I did see an awesome statement about this though... Quote: Maybe if we start calling Solyndra “Halliburton,” the MSM will begin covering this story?
|
Author: | Dash [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Politics aside, I know companies go under all the time but this is really shitty for the 1000+ workers who just showed up one day and got canned. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Dash wrote: Politics aside, I know companies go under all the time but this is really shitty for the 1000+ workers who just showed up one day and got canned. Agreed, but that only appears to be the tip of the proverbial iceberg. |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I still don't get it. Assuming Solyndra was doing very well, that would be 550million, for 1,100 jobs. WTF. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |