The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
See what he did there? https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7103 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Taskiss [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | See what he did there? |
Quote: "No single individual built America on their own, we built it together. We have been, and always will be, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all; a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with responsibilities to one another. Members of Congress, it is time for us to meet our responsibilities." He made me feel all warm and fuzzy, then he reached his hand into my pocket.He should have at least fondled my balls. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Skipped speech, watched Madmen. He's no Roosevelt, JFK, or even Clinton. Not worth my time. |
Author: | Müs [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Don't care. Football's on. |
Author: | FarSky [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Daily Show'll have highlights (or, rather, lowlights) Monday. Never watched addresses before, not really going to start now. |
Author: | Dash [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
Facebook post by a friend of mine: "Missed Obama's speech. Guess I'll go plug in my wife's hair dryer and listen to that for 20 minutes" |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Was at work. I probably would have had to turn it off, as I hear the words "more of the same" being bandied about. I listened to his early speeches, he is the President after all. It seems however I get tired of him repacking the same stuff. |
Author: | Rynar [ Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
Dash wrote: Facebook post by a friend of mine: "Missed Obama's speech. Guess I'll go plug in my wife's hair dryer and listen to that for 20 minutes" Ha! I actually had something similar to say myself. |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 8-19-52-31 Even AP is calling him out on the bullshit |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, I watched it. I was... yeah, about what I expected. The most ridiculous thing I heard was the tax credit for companies hiring folks that have been out of work longer than 6 months. So if I get laid off, I'm at a disadvantage for 6 months. Nice. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Here we go again with the pass the bill pass the bill pass the bill yet nothing is written down. |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
http://nation.foxnews.com/obama-jobs-pl ... -fall-down continuing a long line of threats. Pass this or the bridges get it! |
Author: | FarSky [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Hannibal wrote: Here we go again with the pass the bill pass the bill pass the bill yet nothing is written down. Yeah! Well, except http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default ... bs-act.pdf Or this, for a shorter version: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/jobs-act ... canJobsAct |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
Uncle Fester wrote: http://nation.foxnews.com/obama-jobs-plan/2011/09/14/obama-pass-my-bill-or-bridges-will-fall-down continuing a long line of threats. Pass this or the bridges get it! Please. Everybody knows the bridges are too big to fall. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
FarSky wrote: Hannibal wrote: Here we go again with the pass the bill pass the bill pass the bill yet nothing is written down. Yeah! Well, except http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default ... bs-act.pdf Or this, for a shorter version: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/jobs-act ... canJobsAct It's kind of disingenuous to point out that 5-6 days later, the proposal is provided, when for those same 5-6 days the rhetoric has been "pass this bill now" (which begs the question, because the President submits it, is it even a bill?). Anyone gong to defend the statements of: "Everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything." and "It will not add to the deficit."? Especially in light of the fact that a major portion of the funding for this is intended to come from a tax revenue plan that failed to pass Congress when the D's held a majority in the House and a Super-majority in the Senate. |
Author: | Khross [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
Fairly certain the President absolutely doesn't understand the separation of powers |
Author: | FarSky [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Vindicarre wrote: FarSky wrote: Hannibal wrote: Here we go again with the pass the bill pass the bill pass the bill yet nothing is written down. Yeah! Well, except http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default ... bs-act.pdf Or this, for a shorter version: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/jobs-act ... canJobsAct It's kind of disingenuous to point out that 5-6 days later, the proposal is provided, when for those same 5-6 days the rhetoric has been "pass this bill now" (which begs the question, because the President submits it, is it even a bill?). He said in his speech that it was going to be available immediately (i.e. during/immediately after the speech. I didn't bother to care or look for it until now, but I've no reason to assume that it wasn't made available at the time of the speech. *shrug* Ninja edit: The basic plan was posted on Sep. 8, the day of the speech. The full text was posted Monday, Sept. 12th. I don't particularly care about the act or whether or not it's passed; I just don't like seeing disingenuous bullshit bandied about as unfair criticism. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I understand and applaud your skepticism. How about we meet in the middle and say Congress couldn't pass it because it wasn't submitted to them? I see that he sent a memorandum to Congress on the 12th, and I recall him holding a document while giving his human prop speech in the Rose Garden, on the 12th, saying he was going to submit it to Congress right after the speech. Do you feel the same about the rhetoric that was used regarding the "bill" being "paid for" and that it will not "add to the deficit"? Do you see that as disingenuous bullshit bandied about to deflect criticism? |
Author: | FarSky [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
It's certainly rhetoric, but I don't understand the correlation to the point at hand...my point of contention was whomever on the last page complaining that it wasn't written down, blah blah blah. Again, I don't care about the content of the bill...I haven't read it, don't care if it's passed or not, and am pretty resigned to some useless iteration being passed that does nothing but gives both the Democrats and Republican something crow about. But it's like that Rick Perry image in the random pictures thread. Criticize something of note, and don't make **** up. Edit: wait, no, this page. Figured we'd have hit page 2 by now. |
Author: | Nitefox [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Bravo http://blog.heritage.org/2011/09/14/con ... ama-delay/ |
Author: | Hannibal [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
FarSky wrote: Hannibal wrote: Here we go again with the pass the bill pass the bill pass the bill yet nothing is written down. Yeah! Well, except http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default ... bs-act.pdf Or this, for a shorter version: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/jobs-act ... canJobsAct When I started *****, it was the 9th. Obama had been saying pass the bill since the 8th. He finally puts it down for release on the 12th, and if one was inclined to read it and parse the numbers, I'd say the 14th would be the earliest to make judgements. So nyahhh |
Author: | Rynar [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Anyone else other than Vindi notice that this "bill" proposes to strip the tax free status from municipal bonds from any investors who earn more than $200k/yr.? As if munis weren't having enough trouble attracting new investors. Not to mention the effect this will have on the ability of upper-middle class citizens to send their children, who do not qualify for aid, to college. Poorly thought out, as usual. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Rynar wrote: Anyone else other than Vindi notice that this "bill" proposes to strip the tax free status from municipal bonds from any investors who earn more than $200k/yr.? As if munis weren't having enough trouble attracting new investors. Not to mention the effect this will have on the ability of upper-middle class citizens to send their children, who do not qualify for aid, to college. Poorly thought out, as usual. On the contrary, it's exceedingly well thought out. If municipalities have a harder time issuing bonds, they'll need more Federal funds, which can have little strings attached. You know, like, "set your DUI limit to X or no highway money for you" type strings. It's brilliant. |
Author: | Khross [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
I've read the long version of the bill cover to cover ... And I wonder why the President wants to demand shift temporary labor by no more than 9 months and call it a massive employment victory. |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
You don't wonder at all. |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: See what he did there? |
http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-if-you-lo ... this-bill/ "If you love me, you will help pass the bill" "Why don't you call anymore, don't you love me?" "Don't leave me I need your love!" |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |