The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
How much money do you deserve to keep? https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7147 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | How much money do you deserve to keep? |
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/you-don ... chakowsky/ |
Author: | Xequecal [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
What's the problem? She's absolutely right, you don't deserve to keep 100% of the money you earn. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
You should be able to keep most of it, because the free market leads to amazing development like Hong Kong. Whether you 'deserve' it depends on your interpretration of the word. |
Author: | Midgen [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
you 'deserve' to keep all of it. What is in question is how much the government should be allowed to take... |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: How much money do you deserve to keep? |
The question is not how much you deserve to keep; it's how much you should have to pay for the services society provides, and what the appropriate services are. That is one nice side benefit of a sales tax; it avoids this stupid distortion of the issue into "stealing" and "how much you deserve to keep" when people want to score rhetorical points over taxation. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: How much money do you deserve to keep? |
Diamondeye wrote: The question is not how much you deserve to keep; it's how much you should have to pay for the services society provides, and what the appropriate services are. That is one nice side benefit of a sales tax; it avoids this stupid distortion of the issue into "stealing" and "how much you deserve to keep" when people want to score rhetorical points over taxation. +1 |
Author: | Corolinth [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Long have I pondered a racial epithet for Democrats to go alongside Repugnicans and Teabaggers. I'm thinking Feebocrats and Blueball Commie Liberals, which will be shortened to Blueballs or Blueballers. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
How much do I deserve to keep? More than I make. |
Author: | Corolinth [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
That's why I vote for policies that will allow me to take more of Khross' money. |
Author: | Talya [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Corolinth wrote: That's why I vote for policies that will allow me to take more of Khross' money. **** you. Khross's money needs to go to help poor redheaded mothers who post on the Glade and live in Ontario. |
Author: | TheRiov [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good grief. Your salary, hourly wage, or however else you're paid, figures in that the gov't will be taking a big chunk of that. If you got to take home 100% of your paycheck, your paychecks would be smaller. You think that companies would just give you the the excess they didn't have to pay to taxes? They know that they set your salary based on what you take home. The actual dollar amount you get before taxes is immaterial. They'll pay you the same take home regardless, because they know you'll work for that. Change your perspective. You get paid your take-home+Benefits. If there were no taxes your take home would be the same. (possibly worse, because businesses would have fewer reasons to offer benefits (no tax incentives)) |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: How much money do you deserve to keep? |
That's funny. I didn't notice anyone's pay dropping when Bush's tax cuts went through. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
You know, it was my recollection that I got offered a wage *before* they made me fill out a W-4, Riov. |
Author: | Midgen [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I know this isn't a new concept, but we need to do away with payroll deduction. Make people write a check for the taxes every year. It's probably the only thing that will ever stimulate any real change. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Midgen wrote: I know this isn't a new concept, but we need to do away with payroll deduction. Make people write a check for the taxes every year. It's probably the only thing that will ever stimulate any real change. The government would never collect anything. The #1 problem in the US is that people can't save money, do you think people would be capable of saving 25% of their income to pay once a year? |
Author: | Khross [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Xequecal wrote: The #1 problem in the US is that people can't save money... You do realize that for a significant portion of our population this is entirely the government's fault, right?
|
Author: | Corolinth [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hardly, it's your fault you greedy bastard. If I had more of your money, I could save money rather than just blowing my entire Khross's money check on crack. |
Author: | TheRiov [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Kaffis Mark V wrote: You know, it was my recollection that I got offered a wage *before* they made me fill out a W-4, Riov. with the understanding that taxes would be taken out. Are you really so naive that you think that such things are not figured in? |
Author: | Khross [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
TheRiov wrote: Kaffis Mark V wrote: You know, it was my recollection that I got offered a wage *before* they made me fill out a W-4, Riov. with the understanding that taxes would be taken out. Are you really so naive that you think that such things are not figured in?You do know that your employer matches both of your payroll tax deductions? You do know that your employer is required to keep various forms of liability and damage insurance beyond whatever immediate benefit is provided to you right? You do know that your "unemployment benefits" are paid into a state run insurance account and fundamentally operate as a tax on you having job? You do know that your employer likely pays somewhere around 75% of your actual group plan costs right? More to the point, you do know that all of these wonderful expenses no one told you about in high school are based on your gross salary, not your net? Consequently, since your employer actually has to figure out how much you cost them (and you better believe your value needs to meet their cost, not your salary ...) based on your gross pay, it would be naive to assume they do their calculations based on your take home at all. In fact, the only thing about your net they care about is not breaking a god damned withholding law in getting you that check. And, by the by, all of those taxes and government imposed costs are higher if you're self-employed ... But, yeah, I offer my employees their wages based on take home ... Actually, you know, come to think of it ... In 13 years of owning a multi-state operation, I've never once offered a person a salary based on what they'd take home; I've always offered them a salary based on what it cost my **** business. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Khross wrote: Xequecal wrote: The #1 problem in the US is that people can't save money... You do realize that for a significant portion of our population this is entirely the government's fault, right?Oh, ****. My sides hurt. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
TheRiov wrote: Kaffis Mark V wrote: You know, it was my recollection that I got offered a wage *before* they made me fill out a W-4, Riov. with the understanding that taxes would be taken out. Are you really so naive that you think that such things are not figured in? How do they know how much will be taken out? Have they done a survey to discover my (hypothetical) spouse's earnings? Or my taxable investments? If not, they don't know what tax bracket I fall into, and thus, cannot determine how much to "pad" my target income so that I'll have the right amount left over to pay my taxes. |
Author: | TheRiov [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Khross wrote: TheRiov wrote: Kaffis Mark V wrote: You know, it was my recollection that I got offered a wage *before* they made me fill out a W-4, Riov. with the understanding that taxes would be taken out. Are you really so naive that you think that such things are not figured in?You do know that your employer matches both of your payroll tax deductions? You do know that your employer is required to keep various forms of liability and damage insurance beyond whatever immediate benefit is provided to you right? You do know that your "unemployment benefits" are paid into a state run insurance account and fundamentally operate as a tax on you having job? You do know that your employer likely pays somewhere around 75% of your actual group plan costs right? More to the point, you do know that all of these wonderful expenses no one told you about in high school are based on your gross salary, not your net? Consequently, since your employer actually has to figure out how much you cost them (and you better believe your value needs to meet their cost, not your salary ...) based on your gross pay, it would be naive to assume they do their calculations based on your take home at all. In fact, the only thing about your net they care about is not breaking a god damned withholding law in getting you that check. And, by the by, all of those taxes and government imposed costs are higher if you're self-employed ... But, yeah, I offer my employees their wages based on take home ... Actually, you know, come to think of it ... In 13 years of owning a multi-state operation, I've never once offered a person a salary based on what they'd take home; I've always offered them a salary based on what it cost my **** business. Yes I'm well aware of these things Khross. But you're not just going to give them money if you don't have to. lets use your numbers: CURRENT SITUATION: You're hiring a highly skilled/educated employee with lots of experience. In order to retain that person you're offering them a salary of $100,000/yr. Now your costs are $140,000/year. The person's take home is more like $60,000/yr. YOUR HYPOTHETICAL: World without tax, you can hire a person for $60,000 that they can live comfortably off of. Their expenses remain unchanged. Are you going to just hire someone for $140,000 (so your costs are unchanged) knowing you could get the same employee for $60,000? of course not. Nor are you going to pay them $100,000. You're going to pocket the difference. you MIGHT use that cash to pay for another employee. But what if you don't have the work? I've seen enough places that don't fail to hire people because they can't afford it-- they don't hire people because they have nothing for those people to do. |
Author: | Rynar [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Khross: You forgot that TheRiov lives in a vacuum in which there is only one employer and wealth is static. |
Author: | Khross [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: How much money do you deserve to keep? |
Rynar: No, I just figured someone forgot to give him his Thorazine today. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't see how the distinction between these two things is all that relevant. No, a business isn't going to hire an employee whose cost exceeds his value, but at the same time an employee isn't going to take the job if his take home pay isn't commeasurate with his skills and experience. If a different company can find a way to increase the employee's value, through a better support system or process or whatever, they can increase his pay and still have it be a net gain for them, and he'll go work there instead. But seriously, if the government suddenly decided to no longer collect the employer side of the SS tax, do you think you'd get a 6% raise? Of course you wouldn't, your value as an employee hasn't increased, he's not going to pay you more just because his costs went down. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |