The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:21 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:41 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Mississippi Code, Title 97, Chapter 3, Section 3 prohibits abortion except when carried out by a doctor to preserve the mother's life or in the case of rape. We have ONE abortion clinic in Mississippi.

Now, our state is trying to pass Proposition 26, which appears to be, in its entirety, one sentence which leaves doors wide open for speculation and legal gray area:

http://www.sos.ms.gov/page.aspx?s=7&s1=1&s2=84

Quote:
SECTION I. Article III of the constitution for the state of Mississippi is hereby amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION to read:
Section 33. Person defined. As used in this Article III of the state constitution, "The term 'person' of 'persons' shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof."

This initiative shall not require any additional revenue for implementation.


The questions arise: What about ectopic pregnancies or other cases where the mother's life is clearly in danger? What about cases where the life of the mother is a gray area such as in cases of chorioamnionitis, pre-ecclampsia/ecclampsia, complications of maternal diseases such as cancer that happen before the baby is viable but the decision/immediate consequences are not absolutely clear? What about situations of mothers with multiple miscarriages...will these be prosecuted as suspected homicides?

If this passes, how many more doctors will leave our already defunct health care system in Mississippi? We already have a shortage of doctors because of our high malpractice insurance rates.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like too many people are actually going to look beyond the "this outlaws abortion in all forms" bit....except, as mentioned before, abortion is already illegal in our state except in cases of rape or saving the mother's life.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:47 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Non doctors regulating doctors. Kinda like senators.trying to regulate healthcare or finances. They just have no fcking clue.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:53 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Doctors triage between persons everyday, but yeah the law is a little vague.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Does the woman have to prove she was raped? Seems if it was a normal consensual act, she could lie about it to get an abortion. On the other hand, if she does have to prove it and doesn't have the evidence, she is kind of screwed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 330
None of that matters LK the only thing that matters is saving a human life, it is all important and no one should be able to take a life from someone no matter what the circumstances.... oh excuse me I need to run to the pharmacy we are low on our execution drugs I will be back in a bit to continue my explanation on how we cannot let people kill other people.

_________________
I met this six-year-old child, with this blank, pale, emotionless face and, the blackest eyes... the devil's eyes. I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up because I realized what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply... evil


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:01 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Hannibal wrote:
Non doctors regulating doctors. Kinda like senators.trying to regulate healthcare or finances. They just have no fcking clue.


No, they don't. No clue at all.

Here is a grey area case (real case):

Patient goes in to the hospital for pre-term labor, fetus is 19/20 weeks gestation. (Viability isn't until 24 weeks.) For whatever reason, pre-term labor stops with the cervix dilated to 5cm and the amniotic sac is half in, half out of the birth canal. Because of the amniotic sac's contamination by the natural flora/fauna of the birth canal, there is no way to push the sac back in and sew the cervix closed because of the risk of inevitable infection. At 23 weeks and 3 days, the patient succumbs to chorioamnionitis. There is no way to cure this, the baby has to be delivered, viable or not in order to save the mother's life. At this point in our legal system, the mother's life comes before the life of the baby. Now, if Prop 26 passes, this scenario could change...the doctors would have to take into account the life of the fetus as well. It's entirely possible that the doctors would decide to give the fetus the 4 additional days needed to reach viability...it's not definite that the mother would die, but there's a pretty good chance considering that in the original scenario she had a wide-spread infection with a 103 degree fever and needed IV antibiotics for 24 hours after an immediate delivery resulting in the demise of the fetus an hour later due to lung immaturity. The doctors would have to weigh whether it was in the best interest of the life of the fetus to stay in the infected womb for a few more days or not....in cases like these, it should be up to the doctors because there is just NO CLEAR CUT answer...as of right now, it is hard enough as it is to make these decisions. Making doctors have the added weight of wondering if they will be prosecuted for these decisions would be a nightmare.

I can think of dozens of more examples, but that's just one of them.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:10 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Most execution drugs as you've dubbed them prevent fertilization as I understand it. A lot of sperm and eggs get "wasted" in normal reproductive processes, so I don't think comparing preventing fertilization with destroying embryos and fetuses is valid on all points.

Kate,

I don't have anything against cases like that. In my opinion that's triage between persons; doctors and patients making a decision based on the realities of that case. If you feel that law is going to inhibit that, don't vote for it and tell your friends.


Lex Luthor wrote:
Does the woman have to prove she was raped? Seems if it was a normal consensual act, she could lie about it to get an abortion. On the other hand, if she does have to prove it and doesn't have the evidence, she is kind of screwed.


I would assume you'd have to fill out a police report and all the crime that goes with that. I don't see people claiming to be sexually assaulted to game the system. This is one of those areas I'm sure how I feel about. I get both sides of that issue, but as I've said before these are the "tail" of abortions in this country right now.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Last edited by Rorinthas on Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:20 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Rorinthas wrote:
In my opinion that's triage between persons.



I do like your term "triage of persons" because it implies that in cases like an ectopic pregnancy, it would clearly be a case of no case at all...the pregnancy would have to be terminated, period. But the amendment doesn't allow for that. Triage of persons does not usually deal with cases where you actually have to kill one person in order to save another.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:23 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Then it probably needs to be voted down for clearer language in that area. I like the idea of fetus person hood because of the other benefits, but you have to be able to let doctors make calls in cases like that.

We just need to invent the artificial womb and put this whole debate to rest.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:30 am 
Offline
Home of the Whopper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 6098
Ror, I like Prop 26 and the idea of personhood for a fetus, but I don't like the gray areas.
Many people want to stop all abortions, but they don't want the amendment to pass because of it preventing birth control methods like the IUD...what they fail to realize is that if they believe that abortion is wrong, then by the same token, they should agree that things like the IUD which effectively prevent the fertilized egg from implanting (thereby causing it's death) are just as wrong....but these same people want abortion to be illegal but be allowed to have IUDS and the "morning after" pill...their argument would seem to be then, that they don't think of the fertilized egg as a person but then at some point within a week or so (when you'd have to have an abortion to terminate the pregnancy), it has all of a sudden become a person?

I like the clear cut idea of defining personhood at conception...it jives with my personal beliefs, but I dislike the lack of legal definitions for the matter of enforcement.

_________________
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Jesus of Nazareth


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:56 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
"Personhood" at viability outside the womb.

Other than that, its not the government's business.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Müs wrote:
"Personhood" at viability outside the womb.

Other than that, its not the government's business.

So, if we kill it, you can never prove to me that it was really viable...?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:09 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Completely unrelated:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/ ... GK20111027

Not for the sensitive:
Spoiler:
Two abortion clinic employees plead guilty to murder
Story contains graphic descriptions in paragraphs five through eight.

By Dave Warner

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Two employees of a Philadelphia abortion clinic where live, viable babies were allegedly killed and a patient died after being given on overdose of painkillers pleaded guilty on Thursday to murder.

Guilty pleas to third-degree murder were entered by Adrienne Moton, 34, and Sherry West, 52, who both worked for Dr. Kermit Gosnell at what prosecutors have described as a decrepit and unsanitary clinic known as Women's Medical Society in West Philadelphia.

Due to a court-issued gag order, attorneys declined to comment on reports that no plea agreement was reached in the case.

Sentencing was set for December 2 by Common Pleas Judge Benjamin Lerner. The maximum penalty for third-degree murder is 40 years in prison.

Seven more defendants face charges in the case, including Gosnell, who a grand jury in January said, "killed babies and endangered women. What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable babies in the third trimester of pregnancy -- and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors."

The grand jury said that a clinic co-worker of Moton's testified that a woman gave birth to a large baby at the clinic, delivering the child into a toilet. The jurors identified the newborn as "Baby D."

The jurors said the co-worker told them that the baby was moving and looked like it was swimming.

"Moton reached into the toilet, got the baby out and cut its neck," the grand jury said in its report.

West was accused of murder in the death of a 41-year-old patient, Karnamaya Mongar.

"The evidence presented to the grand jury established that Karnamaya Mongar died of cardiac arrest because she was overdosed with Demerol," the grand jurors said.

The grand jury said West and another employee administered the drug at Gosnell's direction and that Mongar died as a result of "wanton reckless conduct."

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:15 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Müs wrote:
"Personhood" at viability outside the womb.

Other than that, its not the government's business.

So, if we kill it, you can never prove to me that it was really viable...?


Shouldn't have to prove a thing to you. Its none of your business.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:08 am
Posts: 906
This will probably derail into the old abortion arguments as usual, but I will simply add my view since I'm a resident of this state.

It wouldn't surprise me if it is passed. I do not agree with it. I also don't agree with personhood begins at conception. I believe "personhood" begins once the fetus is delivered with a heartbeat, and becomes a baby.

Lots of women don't know when they conceived. Some in this dumbass state don't know they are 6 months pregnant.

There are simply too many things that can happen before the fetus exits the body with a heartbeat, to make me consider it warrants "personhood" status.

I understand others feel different, and some (even here) are emotionally attached to this topic. I will respect their views and not argue mine vs theirs.

And with that, I will exit this thread.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:20 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Can anyone here tell me when they became a person? Hell, does anyone here have any idea what separates a person from a human being?

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Khross wrote:
Can anyone here tell me when they became a person? Hell, does anyone here have any idea what separates a person from a human being?


When they have lots of cells?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:00 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Just seems to me that if people are going to dismiss the forms of study and discourse that deal with this subject, they should just probably give up on the abortion debate itself.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
There is no line at all when someone becomes a person after the time of conception. It is completely arbitrary to make one. Abortion is a lesser form of murder, but there is a persistently high demand for it because it improves the quality of women's lives. Getting accidentally pregnant is an all too easy mistake.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Can anyone here tell me when they became a person? Hell, does anyone here have any idea what separates a person from a human being?


You're treading on some dangerous territory there. Some people would happily tell you that severely retarded people don't count as "persons" because they don't know any better if they aren't treated as such. If we, say, confiscate money they are entitled to for the benefit of others as long as their physical needs are met, that's perfectly ok. This sort of person will usually go on to tell you that we should regard chimpanzees as persons before the severely retarded in order to be "consistent".

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:30 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Personhood is a legality, nothing more.

It just happens to be the legality that determines your legal rights, however.

There's nothing special about being a person or a human being that grants you any kind of inherent value above or beyond the other bits of stardust in the universe. The universe doesn't care if you're human. You're just a collection of elements in chemical reaction with each other. However, other persons/human beings (that's us) do place a subjective value on our lives and the lives of those around us. However we choose to subjectively define personhood is rather up to us.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Last edited by Talya on Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:30 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Khross wrote:
Can anyone here tell me when they became a person? Hell, does anyone here have any idea what separates a person from a human being?

I have thoughts, but I can't be sure. Can you?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Posts: 330
Maybe this could work in a good way. If a fetus is declared a person, then no more abortions. So now the doctor can just remove the fetus unharmed and send it on its way, its an emancipation not an abortion. The law has declared it a person and a person should be able to survive on their own right? End the tyranny of the womb free the person.

_________________
I met this six-year-old child, with this blank, pale, emotionless face and, the blackest eyes... the devil's eyes. I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up because I realized what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply... evil


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Killuas wrote:
Maybe this could work in a good way. If a fetus is declared a person, then no more abortions. So now the doctor can just remove the fetus unharmed and send it on its way, its an emancipation not an abortion. The law has declared it a person and a person should be able to survive on their own right? End the tyranny of the womb free the person.


So a mother can abandon her infant whereever she wants?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Talya wrote:
Personhood is a legality, nothing more.

It just happens to be the legality that determines your legal rights, however.

There's nothing special about being a person or a human being that grants you any kind of inherent value above or beyond the other bits of stardust in the universe. The universe doesn't care if you're human. You're just a collection of elements in chemical reaction with each other. However, other persons/human beings (that's us) do place a subjective value on our lives and the lives of those around us. However we choose to subjectively define personhood is rather up to us.

^Truth.

That doesn't mean people will accept it though.

My opinions are sacred, yours are fallacious. Sucks to be you.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group