The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Germany and Russia are pissed at the reversal in direction by the Board of Director's at GM to not sell Opel to a German parts manufacturer and a Russian bank.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
They have every right to be pissed. That is BS, if they agreed to the sale and are now balking at it..

F-ing Government Motors.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:34 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
They hadn't agreed to the sale. They were talking about it.

No means no. :p

GM said no, and Germany still wants to put the dick in.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:37 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Müs wrote:
They hadn't agreed to the sale. They were talking about it.

No means no. :p

GM said no, and Germany still wants to put the dick in.


It is germany.. no does not mean no; Baaaaaaa means no.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
What makes this interesting to me is the potential conflict of interest between GM and the US Government. It has already been shown that our glorious leaders have no qualms about forcing decisions on GM to satisfy political goals rather than economic, so I'm curious how this will play out.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Ladas wrote:
What makes this interesting to me is the potential conflict of interest between GM and the US Government. It has already been shown that our glorious leaders have no qualms about forcing decisions on GM to satisfy political goals rather than economic, so I'm curious how this will play out.

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking this. I think my first thought was, "Hmm. Are we going to have Secretaries of State brokering corporate sales and mergers, now?"

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:48 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Ladas wrote:
What makes this interesting to me is the potential conflict of interest between GM and the US Government. It has already been shown that our glorious leaders have no qualms about forcing decisions on GM to satisfy political goals rather than economic, so I'm curious how this will play out.

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking this. I think my first thought was, "Hmm. Are we going to have Secretaries of State brokering corporate sales and mergers, now?"


Yes.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:53 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Ladas wrote:
What makes this interesting to me is the potential conflict of interest between GM and the US Government. It has already been shown that our glorious leaders have no qualms about forcing decisions on GM to satisfy political goals rather than economic, so I'm curious how this will play out.

I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking this. I think my first thought was, "Hmm. Are we going to have Secretaries of State brokering corporate sales and mergers, now?"


I am OK with that. If we assume that as a US Citizen I am now a shareholder in GM due to the bailout then I would want my interests as both Joe Public and a shareholder protected. GM's management will always seek to take care of the business-side ($$$) on behalf of the shareholders but as a US Citizen who represents me? Who says, "No, those jobs belong in America. That money should stay here and benefit all of us. We need a manufacturing base in case of a global breakdown/crisis/war?" I am not saying that is what occurred here obviously but if you accept my money then I want a say in how its utilized.

I would say the true ugly face of capitalism is capitalism unchecked, or where the desire to earn money supercedes the greater good of the society that gave rise to and support the corporation. It is no different to me than the EPA who regulate the societal cost of doing business, just because the company doesn't pay it doesn't mean that it is not a true cost.

*editted for obvious misspelling, rough night*

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Hopwin, we, as the aggregate public to whom the government is responsible, are now shareholders via the government. The shareholders' interests *are* our interests, if we want the government to get repaid its "investment" and thus to not have wasted our tax dollars.

There's no reason to have anybody making decisions based on what's good for the economy or our national manufacturing base. They need to make decisions based on what is healthy and profitable for the company, so we can get our money's worth.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:23 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Hopwin, we, as the aggregate public to whom the government is responsible, are now shareholders via the government. The shareholders' interests *are* our interests, if we want the government to get repaid its "investment" and thus to not have wasted our tax dollars.

There's no reason to have anybody making decisions based on what's good for the economy or our national manufacturing base. They need to make decisions based on what is healthy and profitable for the company, so we can get our money's worth.


True but too often capitalism exists in a void which allows corporations to continue ignoring the social ramifications of their actions in pursuit of a dollar. I would rather collect both economic and social benefits as a shareholder.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:07 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Hopwin wrote:
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Hopwin, we, as the aggregate public to whom the government is responsible, are now shareholders via the government. The shareholders' interests *are* our interests, if we want the government to get repaid its "investment" and thus to not have wasted our tax dollars.

There's no reason to have anybody making decisions based on what's good for the economy or our national manufacturing base. They need to make decisions based on what is healthy and profitable for the company, so we can get our money's worth.


True but too often capitalism exists in a void which allows corporations to continue ignoring the social ramifications of their actions in pursuit of a dollar. I would rather collect both economic and social benefits as a shareholder.


So long as people freely enter into contract to purchase that corporation's goods and or services the society feels that the actions of the corporation are in the interest of society.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:01 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Elmarnieh wrote:
So long as people freely enter into contract to purchase that corporation's goods and or services the society feels that the actions of the corporation are in the interest of society.


Which society? We live in global society where we can export the negative aspects of capitalism via outsourcing. Is it good for the Chinese people to get cancer by drinking the polluted waters of the Yellow River? If not how do they cool the demand for the goods that are purchased here in the US?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Hopwin wrote:
True but too often capitalism exists in a void which allows corporations to continue ignoring the social ramifications of their actions in pursuit of a dollar. I would rather collect both economic and social benefits as a shareholder.



There is no void. There only exists a perceived void. The "social ramifications" of their actions can only be ignored if they are fiscally disincentivized by external forces or because no real demand for a "socially responsible production" exists.

For instance, in general as a country, we think we ought to force companies, through legislation, to be "greener". However, at the same time, we are unwilling to pay more for a "green" product. Were that the case, all manufacturers would have to do is offer such a product and consumers would buy it. It's not like companies are unwilling to listen to what their customers (those that keep them in business) want. The obvious answer is, they want it, but don't want to pay for it.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Rafael wrote:
The obvious answer is, they want it, but don't want to pay for it.

Thank God for big government! They've been providing solutions for this quandary for decades!
/sarcasm

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:13 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Hopwin wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
So long as people freely enter into contract to purchase that corporation's goods and or services the society feels that the actions of the corporation are in the interest of society.


Which society? We live in global society where we can export the negative aspects of capitalism via outsourcing. Is it good for the Chinese people to get cancer by drinking the polluted waters of the Yellow River? If not how do they cool the demand for the goods that are purchased here in the US?



I live in Bryn Mawr, PA USA. I don't know where you live but people in Istanbul are not part of my society.

It isn't good for the people who drink the water, the benefit gained by all the other citizens whom have increased productivity happiness and quality of life because of the industries and employment may outweigh that. We cannot know because the government of China is authoritarian meaning the society is not able to give true evaluation.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:10 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Elmarnieh wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
I live in Bryn Mawr, PA USA. I don't know where you live but people in Istanbul are not part of my society.

It isn't good for the people who drink the water, the benefit gained by all the other citizens whom have increased productivity happiness and quality of life because of the industries and employment may outweigh that. We cannot know because the government of China is authoritarian meaning the society is not able to give true evaluation.


I live in Ohio, I picked China because it was an obvious example. Let's make it local heard of Love Canal? Did someone, somewhere benefit? Sure. Was it the local populace? Not so much. Capitalism would tell us this is fine because it dismisses societal costs as intangible.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:40 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Hooker Chemical, its customers, and its employees benefited. So has everyone that has been employed by the EPA funny enough.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:36 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Elmarnieh wrote:
Hooker Chemical, its customers, and its employees benefited. So has everyone that has been employed by the EPA funny enough.


That's the point Elmarnieh... they benefitted without paying the price of the output. They dumped all the negatives on the populace at Love Canal while reaping the benefits.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:52 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Corporateism vs Capitalism. Big, huge, massive difference.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:59 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Hopwin wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Hooker Chemical, its customers, and its employees benefited. So has everyone that has been employed by the EPA funny enough.


That's the point Elmarnieh... they benefitted without paying the price of the output. They dumped all the negatives on the populace at Love Canal while reaping the benefits.



The city didn't have to be buy the problem and did not investigation into what it was buying with public funds. If they polluted off of their grounds they owe damages to the property owner. Hooker Chemical didn't though - they simply sold it to a buyer who didn't even do basic investigation.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:09 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
So perhaps the buyer was so blinded by greed and possible quick and easy wealth that they didn't look into what they were buying? Unpossible. Stop being a racist and realize that those people were victims of that faceless corporate entity that put a gun to the heads of the buyer and told them to sign or else.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
While there are a lot of good examples of coporate malfeasance resulting in tragedy, the Love Canal is not one of them.

Quote:
At the time of the dump's closure, Niagara Falls' population began to expand drastically. The local school board was desperate for land, and attempted to purchase an area of expensive property from Hooker Chemical that had not yet been used to bury toxic waste. The corporation refused to sell, citing safety concerns, and even took members of the school board to the canal and drilled several bore holes through the clay, to demonstrate that there were toxic chemicals below the surface. However, the board refused to capitulate.[10] Eventually, faced with the property being condemned and/or expropriated, Hooker Chemical agreed to sell on the condition that the board buy the entire property for one dollar. In the agreement signed on April 28, 1953, Hooker included a seventeen line caveat that explained the dangers of building on the site. Hooker was thus released from all legal obligations should lawsuits arise in the future.


Quote:
Prior to the delivery of this instrument of conveyance, the grantee herein has been advised by the grantor that the premises above described have been filled, in whole or in part, to the present grade level thereof with waste products resulting from the manufacturing of chemicals by the grantor at its plant in the City of Niagara Falls, New York, and the grantee assumes all risk and liability incident to the use thereof. It is therefore understood and agreed that, as a part of the consideration for this conveyance and as a condition thereof, no claim, suit, action or demand of any nature whatsoever shall ever be made by the grantee, its successors or assigns, against the grantor, its successors or assigns, for injury to a person or persons, including death resulting therefrom, or loss of or damage to property caused by, in connection with or by reason of the presence of said industrial wastes. It is further agreed as a condition hereof that each subsequent conveyance of the aforesaid lands shall be made subject to the foregoing provisions and conditions.


IMHO, the biggest problem with capitalism is it is utterly unable to effectively deal with publicly owned property or resources. If you don't cut production costs by dumping in the river/polluting the air/overfishing the ocean, someone else will and will drive you out of business. The result is squandered resources and a destroyed environment, which the free market absolutely cannot do anything about. A government has to step in and pass regulations that say no.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:00 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Technically, market forces can and will react to that, too. It's just a slow process, and the market (the market being the individuals who comprise society) needs to learn to value the things being destroyed. As such, capitalist forces can be slow to react to serious problems like environmental concerns. That said, when they do react, they will do so with greater efficiency and intelligence than artificially attempted legislative "solutions" can ever provide.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
The problem is not capitalism - it is the idea of public property.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Elmarnieh wrote:
The problem is not capitalism - it is the idea of public property.


No one can conceivably own the air or the oceans, and owning an entire river is a pretty tall order.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group